Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: RobbyS
Sacred language should be in classical form.

That is an interesting concept, and one I have not heard previously. Do you think classical forms of English (or any other language for that matter) would sufficiently satisfy the desire for the vernacular? Or would this also be condemned?

541 posted on 12/03/2002 8:38:54 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 537 | View Replies ]


To: Snuffington
My off-hand judgement that it is no accident that the banal text of the new mass appeared during the time that deconstruction of language in general gained such a following. A valid criticism is the translation often seems empty of meaning.ee nothing "protestant" about it. Nothing Lutherans or Calvinist or Zwinglian. It does seem language that one would use if he were trying to demythologize the mass.
548 posted on 12/03/2002 9:28:51 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson