[BibChr]

Okay, so that's zero, plus zero, plus zero, plus zero. Total?

ZERO!

Still without a syllable of substantial response:

As I have often said, I would have much more personal respect for the Mormon who said, "Oh, no doubt about it: you can't believe what the Bible teaches, taken by itself, and Mormonism at the same time. They are mutually exclusive. I just like Joe." (I feel the same about JW's and RC's, for the record; just change the source authorities.)

You up to that sort of honesty? Or are you beating the "Yep! Yessir! There is and only can be but one God — AND one day we'll ALL be Gods! Yep! Salvation is by grace alone through faith alone on the basis of the finished work of Christ alone — AND I have to add my good deeds to it in order to be saved" drum?

Dan

[Grig]

As predicted, nothing but more childish taunting.

Like I said before, you present nothing but old straw men that have already been given substantial responses many times over. [You do know what a straw man is, don't you?]

Since you don't care about that, and you have this delusion that nobody can honestly hold an opinion contrary to your own, I really don't see any point in going over it yet again. A brick wall would be more reasonable to talk with.

You also seem driven by some egotistical need to 'score' but wake up and realize that it isn't a game, and you can't taunt me into some childish fight. I can see your passion is for the fight itself, not for the truth.

If you somehow miraculously convince me that you are sincere and have become reasonable, then I would gladly take the time to go into detail, but getting me to think that way of you won't be easy given the behaviour I've seen from you do date.

If you are so desperate to know exactly how those 'contridictions' you list are distortions of LDS theology without making the effort of becoming a civil human being, go look it up at one of the many fine LDS apologetics sites around. I have better things to do than try to reason with the unreasonable.

Of course, the fastest way to prove you are not sincere or reasonable beyond all doubt is to post a reply making the false and illogical claim that since I will not go into detail, that I can not, especialy after I point that out to you like I just did.

[restornu]

You up to that sort of honesty? Or are you beating the "Yep! Yessir! There is and only can be but one God — AND one day we'll ALL be Gods! Yep! Salvation is by grace alone through faith alone on the basis of the finished work of Christ alone — AND I have to add my good deeds to it in order to be saved" drum?

Dan

You always have to put your spin on it, the spirit you berate the LDS with is NOT the Holy Spirit, it is some VILE thing you use to VENT with!

You "self rightous vessle" I will tell you as I have said to other SRV!

You are LIKE satan in the Garden of Eden try to beguild the LDS!"

I don't know how many time the LDS have told you we do NOT think about being god or godess even in the Temple. Our focus is on doing Heavenly Father will and our families! It is you who is preoccupy and try to claim that is what we think about, it is you who has impure thoughts about plural marriage. It is you who bring these fruits to the LDS door steps.

They are a prime ingredients to tarish the LDS from the spiritual ignorance of the things from God. It is you and other who would change the definition sacred from God to secret. Now you folks try to lower the bar more call LDS occult!

It you trying to beguild with demands that LDS cast their pearls to anti-LDS swine!

Sadly there are wonderful treasures you children will never know or see because you are so consumed with destroy at all cost!

I can tell you now it will never happen that you or others will ever bring down the "House of the Lord" in this final dispensation! Some of us LDS may faulter, but the WORK of the Lord will NEVER!

I say this humbly!