Skip to comments.
Doctrine trims ranks of Baptist missionaries
Fort Worth Star Telegram ^
| 6/5/2003
| Jim Jones
Posted on 06/05/2003 6:34:10 AM PDT by sinkspur
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: editor-surveyor
Thanks for the insight! Hugs!
To: computerjunkie
UR#26........and my #30..............bttt
42
posted on
06/10/2003 3:29:32 AM PDT
by
maestro
To: maestro
I have a question what is it exactly that these missionaries object to in the BFM? I know the popular objections to the BFM are the statements made about submitting one to another and wives to husbands. But I have a few friends that are pastors in the SBC who believe that the new BFM can be read to say that the pastor is the (sole) interpitor of scripture to the church not the Holy Sprit. I personally have a hard time reading it that way but never the less they do.
Has any one else heard objections to the BFM other than the ones wrapped around the clauses concerning submition?
43
posted on
06/10/2003 5:11:45 AM PDT
by
Texas Patriot
(Bible believing and Born again!!)
To: Texas Patriot
.......Your#43.........BTTT......
I have a question what is it exactly that these missionaries object to in the BFM?
Sounds like a rejection of their rules and Bible truth to me.
44
posted on
06/10/2003 11:23:33 AM PDT
by
maestro
To: maestro
Hmm I agree with you in that they are rejecting something. Are they all in unison in rejecting the proabition against women being pastors or the passages telling us to submit one to another? if so then the SBC is much better off without them and they can go thier merry way. Better the SBC lose all thier missionaries than end up apostate for the sake of political correctness. But on the otherhand are thier other ojections? What are they? please don't get me wrong from what I have read of the BFM I really don't see anything nonbiblical about it. If thats tough for some people to take then so be it. however if those who object have something valid and we dissmiss it out of hand with the other objections it is we who will suffer not them.
45
posted on
06/10/2003 11:48:09 AM PDT
by
Texas Patriot
(Bible believing and Born again!!)
To: Texas Patriot
From your#45........
............from what I have read of the BFM I really don't see anything nonbiblical about it. If thats tough for some people to take then so be it........
I'd say that is the 'bottom line'.
46
posted on
06/10/2003 1:29:04 PM PDT
by
maestro
To: CCWoody; drstevej; RnMomof7
If you look
here, you will see that the "moderates" have distorted the issue somewhat.
47
posted on
06/10/2003 2:08:02 PM PDT
by
Jerry_M
(I can only say that I am a poor sinner, trusting in Christ alone for salvation. -- Gen. Robt E. Lee)
To: Jerry_M; CCWoody; drstevej; RnMomof7; fortheDeclaration; Commander8
Thank you!....................FYI........ping!
48
posted on
06/11/2003 3:39:29 AM PDT
by
maestro
To: Jerry_M
CS<----turns down corner of the page to mark place...
49
posted on
06/11/2003 3:53:54 AM PDT
by
Corin Stormhands
(http://wardsmythe.crimsonblog.com)
To: Jerry_M
"...many Japanese Baptist churches are led by women pastors." "Two missionaries to Japan who were fired, Ron Barrow-Hankins and his wife, Lydia, an ordained minister,..." Jerry, I have a question for you. To my knowledge, Southern Baptists have never endorsed women pastors. So how did women serving as SB missionaries become "pastors" and "ordained ministers" in the first place?
To: computerjunkie
you have a Freepmail reply
51
posted on
06/12/2003 7:46:38 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
(Blessed be the Lord, the God of Israel!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson