[Canticle_of_Deborah]

I found this recently. It is a long but worthwhile read which I think accurately describes the differences we encounter here on the forum.

[Support Free Republic]

We Replaced Patrick Leahy's Brains With Folger's Crystals. Let's See If Anyone Notices!
	Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[Maximilian]

Bump for Fr. Chad Ripperger, FSSP. He is amazingly brilliant.

This has been posted in the past, but it's one of the best articles of all time, so it's worth reading again.

[TradicalRC]

Another philosophical point I would argue is his definition of immanentism. I have always understood it to mean this world, the here and now, rather than an internal worldview. Although, it would also encompass that.

But the type of philisophical worldliness that immanentism stands for also lead to theological abberations such as process theology and liberation theology (Karl Marx wearing a Jesus mask).

[Pyro7480]

Pinging for 6/28/2004.

I think everyone should read this thread again. I know it's not going to satisfy everyone, but it will reveal the thinking of many in the respective camps. I also recommend the following links:
Conservative and Traditional Catholicism Compared
A Brief Defense of Traditionalism

(N.B. I don't necessarily endorse all of the viewpoints expressed in these articles, but I think it's a good starting point in getting everyone to settle down.)