My comment was not directed at your position on minor seminaries per se. It was directed at your flippant dismissal of the value of such seminaries, which are an element of extrinsic tradition. While one who esteems and cherishes extrinsic tradition might seem seek to reform it, such a person would never speak so irreverently about it as did you.
Minor seminaries can't be "reformed." That's why they've been closed.
The entire philosophy behind them is flawed.