1 posted on
07/17/2003 9:33:12 AM PDT by
NYer
To: american colleen; sinkspur; livius; Lady In Blue; Salvation; Polycarp; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; ...
Hasenhuettl was advised of the papal reminder, understood it and proceded on his own volition. Does this constitute a mortal sin?
Definition: For a sin to be mortal, three conditions must be present: grave matter, full knowledge of the evil of the act, and full consent of the will.
2 posted on
07/17/2003 9:35:17 AM PDT by
NYer
(Laudate Dominum)
To: All
Strong Conservative Forums Help Prevent Candidates Like This From Winning Elections
|
|
Finish Strong. Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
07/17/2003 9:37:15 AM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Akron Al; Alberta's Child; Aloysius; AniGrrl; Antoninus; As you well know...; Bellarmine; ...
PING
5 posted on
07/17/2003 9:46:52 AM PDT by
Loyalist
To: NYer
WWJhD?
(What Would Jesus Have Done)
16 posted on
07/17/2003 11:39:06 AM PDT by
Blzbba
To: NYer
IF this priest had endorsed abortion or homosexuality, nothing would have happened to him.
21 posted on
07/17/2003 12:58:33 PM PDT by
ACAC
To: NYer
Yikes
To: NYer
Well he was warrned!
29 posted on
07/17/2003 9:14:39 PM PDT by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: NYer
shoot I'm an Anglican Protestant and this even sounds stupid to me. Either someone holds to the tenets of the denomination (RC use the term religion vice denomination) of which he is a part or he shifts to a denomination to which theology coincides. An RC priest taking part in a Lutheran Communion service is about as dumb as an Anglican Priest taking part in a Lutheran Communion service (note to any ECUSA members, yes I know about the Concordat with the ELCA, that's one of the reasons why my wife and I are Anglicans, not Episcopalians).
Why is that so hard for some people to grasp?
30 posted on
07/17/2003 9:17:02 PM PDT by
ahadams2
(Anglicanism: the next reformation is beginning NOW)
To: NYer; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; ...
Pope John Paul II in April issued a reminder that services in Protestant churches cannot substitute for Sunday Mass.
There is NO QUESTION that services at a SSPX Chapel CAN satisfy your Sunday Obligation. NO QUESTION at all. Therefore, there can no longer be any question that Rome recognizes the SSPX as CATHOLIC. Irregular, not recommended, but CATHOLIC.
31 posted on
07/17/2003 9:32:58 PM PDT by
narses
("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Carindal Arinze of Nigeria)
To: NYer
As a protestant pastor, let me state that I practice "open communion" so I'm inclined to side with the priest's questionable actions.
However, the priest also has agreed to operate within a certain system and should abide by his promise. This doesn't meant that he shouldn't agitate for change in the relationship between Catholics and Protestants.
The best change at this point would be a clarification of the contradiction. The Pope talks of respecting the religious convictions of these separated brethren. Obviously, the most critical part of that line is the word "brethren."
The last I checked, the "brethren" brought about my Dad & Mom were part of my own family.
35 posted on
07/18/2003 1:47:21 AM PDT by
xzins
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson