[George W. Bush]

It's the spammers, you fool! It all go's back to the spammers!

LOL. My point on some of these threads is this: even if you don't like RP's message on Iraq, take a look at the rest of what he says, that liberty and principled small-government conservative message.

If you look at his speeches and videos, he spends a little time on Iraq and foreign policy. But the large majority of his time is spent on domestic issues, sounding classic conservative themes on economics, personal liberty, small-government.

I keep saying it: what is wrong with that message? Why can't all the Republican candidates run on that message?

[BlackElk]

What is wrong with that message is that paleoPaulie refuses to defend our country by attacking our enemies in THEIR lairs but wants to wait until they attack us here first. He must have missed the news coverage on 9/11 or guzzled the Alex Jones Kool Aid because we have already been attacked and many of the attack leaders among paleoPaulie’s Al Qaeda pals still survive. It really does not matter what ANY candidate says once the candidate commits to national suicide as a “peace and prosperity” candidate. He may obsess about money but that is hardly a complete definition of conservative. No one American will make much money after paleoPaulie eagerly opens “trade!!!” with our enemies and admits the Islamofascist wooden horse of his pals.