[Migraine]

So it's not okay for "911truth; 911truthers; antiamerican; antisemite; appeaser; binladensboy; codepink; daviddukespresident; domesticenemy; fundraising; heeeeeeeykoolaid; jihadisforpaul; lron; marines; moonbat; neonazi; paul; paulahmadinejad2008; paulbearers; paulistinians; pimpsforpaul; racist; rino; ronaldapplewhite; ronnutters; ronpaul; shrimpfest2007; surrendermonkey; tehranron; tehronpaul; treason; truther; wrongpaul;" voters to initially support Paul because, afterall, that's what they are being labeled as. But it's perfectly fine, if not expected, for them to support "the good guys" in November?

You might have misunderstood. I don't give a double flip what they do, think or say (sane or otherwise, coherent or otherwise), so long as their guy does not make a 3rd-party run in 08 -- because THAT is the only thing that can get the hildebeeste elected, notwithstanding all the paulistinian characterizations, which were yours, not mine. Support is not coveted. I just never appreciated the kid who kicked all the marbles away out of spite. That's what a 3rd-party run would be like, and just as childish.

[CJ Wolf]

"hildebeeste elected" lol, nothing can get her elected. Everyone knows she is in bed with the chinese, a clintoon, not in love with anything but power, cackling jiggling canckles, warmongering, ignoramus...need I go on...you have nothing to fear, nothing...

And BTW, there is nothing more American then a 3rd party run, no matter who it is. Remember the Whigs?

In my most humble opinion, your best best, for a Republican(ino) voter who is faced with a decision in the primary is to vote for Ron Paul. Then you can avoid losing the party as a whole.

So pick up your sign,

And contribute online,

Join the American call,

and vote for Ron Paul.