Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HEMP: A GREAT CASH CROP
Fiedor Report On the News #244 ^ | 9-9-01 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 09/08/2001 11:10:58 AM PDT by forest

It's the largest cash-crop in my State. Besides what is cultivated, the stuff grows wild like weeds everywhere. In fact, a couple years ago, a nice sized, fully developed patch of the best domestic version was spotted growing in the median of the Interstate highway. No one noticed until fall, when the pretty blue flowers developed.

Yeah, marijuana.

If I were a "toker," I would be in heaven around here. It seems to grow wild in all sorts of strange places -- especially in those not very accessible wooded places down by the river. Alas, I'm rather allergic to the stuff.

If I smell marijuana burning, it aggravates my nose and I start sneezing if I don't quickly get away from the smoke. But, it's out in nature where it really gets to me. When it's damp out, like on a misty morning, I seem to be able to smell that stuff a quarter-mile away. Then, I really start with the sneezing and coughing. I have no idea why that is and I have no intention of experimenting to find out. That's just how it is.

Which means, of course, there are a whole lot of people around here who should be very happy I am not a cop.

Did I mention that marijuana is this State's largest cash crop? Mostly because the federal government interfered in just about everything people can do to make a living in this State, it is. There is good money in growing those "weeds" and government's environmental regulation nerds put the kibosh on just about everything that was legal. People still have to make enough money to keep up a home and eat, so that's the way it goes.

So, even if I do break into a conniption fit of sneezing once in a while, I will never interfere with those who may be "growing" a little commercial product here and there. My practice is to walk the other way before I actually see the stuff -- and begin sneezing.

But, this also puts me in a unique position to talk about both hemp and regular marijuana. I have repeatedly proposed that our State Legislators allow industrial hemp to be grown in this State. That would go far in decreasing cultivation of the smoking kind and would be a great source of inexpensive, high quality paper for some of the major printers we have here. Sure, I would probably still sneeze near the industrial hemp pants -- although that has yet to be determined for certain.

The "excuse" Commonwealth Legislators give for not approving the cultivation of industrial hemp in this State as a cash crop is that police say they cannot tell the difference between the industrial and the smoking kind. That is silliness personified, of course.

Any police officer seeing forty acres of hemp growing in nice rows on a farm should have enough common sense to know that it ain't likely "Farmer Joe" is planting the smoking stuff out in plain sight. If a farmer wanted to grow the smoking kind, ten to one he would grow the stuff back where he did before industrial hemp became legal to grow. In which case, the police would not see it.

Besides, the plants look somewhat different. Which means, police could be trained to know industrial hemp on sight. Sure, that might mean that the officer needs to get out of the car and go look once in a growing season, but that is no big deal. Few farmers would be fooling around with marijuana, anyway. There are good bucks to be made in industrial hemp, this is an optimum area of the country to grow it and it is a relatively easy crop to deal with.

Besides, industrial hemp would stimulate some very interesting industry in this State. Without giving out any proprietary information, we know of at least two major corporations that would move most of their facilities here -- with many, many well paying jobs -- if this were an industrial hemp producing State. Furthermore, more large printers would also be attracted because of the inexpensive, high quality paper.(1)

Of course, as much as I personally repel from the stuff, I also believe that ordinary marijuana should be legalized.(2) It is probably better for humans than hard liquor. Other then the present legal prohibitions, it certainly causes less personal interaction problems in society. And, if taxed and regulated like alcohol, its distribution could be limited to adults.

-----------------------------

1. http://naihc.org

2. http://www.norml.org/news/archives/01-08-30.shtml

 

 

 END

 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last
The "excuse" Commonwealth Legislators give for not approving the cultivation of industrial hemp in this State as a cash crop is that police say they cannot tell the difference between the industrial and the smoking kind. That is silliness personified, of course.
1 posted on 09/08/2001 11:10:58 AM PDT by forest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: forest
HEY, IT'S ANOTHER POT HEAD THREAD ABOUT LEGALIZING THEIR ADDICTION!

SO PATHETIC!

2 posted on 09/08/2001 11:13:31 AM PDT by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
I have never smoked dope but I have been thinkin that it could be done fairly easy in rural parts of the country.
3 posted on 09/08/2001 11:15:58 AM PDT by Pete53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
Easy to grow and no patent on it.

No wonder the corporate-gov't complex hates it.

4 posted on 09/08/2001 11:26:05 AM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forest
Well, times are a'changin. Hang tight for a couple of years, and keep up the pressure. We'll soon see changes north and south of the United States.
5 posted on 09/08/2001 11:33:34 AM PDT by TKEman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
This article is about industrial hemp, not marijuana.

Marijuana is not addictive.

Why should it be illegal? Did the cool kids snub you in high school?

6 posted on 09/08/2001 11:34:19 AM PDT by wienerdog.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Er. Hunh? How does industrial hemp equate to dope smoking?

Also, marijauna is non-physicaly addictive. Yes, some become psychologicaly addicted to it, but people get addicted to chocolate as well.

Sorry if you were being sarcastic, shame on you if you weren't.

7 posted on 09/08/2001 11:34:54 AM PDT by Dead Corpse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TKEman
4:20 dude
8 posted on 09/08/2001 11:35:12 AM PDT by wienerdog.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Why is tobacco legal and marijuana not? Why is alcohol legal, and marijuana not? Those two are more deadly and harmful than marijuana. Even so, hemp IS a good material for many things and this article has a point.
9 posted on 09/08/2001 11:35:39 AM PDT by Shuhite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
This article is about hemp. I've never understood why hemp is illegal, but I bet it has something to do with the paper industry. It just seems silly that hemp can't be put to use.
10 posted on 09/08/2001 11:43:25 AM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forest
Where's the pro-Microsoft crowd that keep insisting on "free and unregulated" markets without any federal intervention? I'd expect Carol Hu-Tex to be all over this.
11 posted on 09/08/2001 11:53:36 AM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
I just did a quick search on hemp and its potential uses are fascinating. Woody is right. No doubt big business has a motive for keeping hemp illegal. Check out this http://www.hempcar.org/hempfacts.shtml
12 posted on 09/08/2001 12:05:52 PM PDT by TBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBall
The Hemp industry had the misfortune to be in the ring with the cotton industry. The cotton industry villified the hemp industry in a pure and simple money grab. Cotton had lobbyists, Hemp did not.

Cotton was much more expensive to process into useable textile exports then hemp so to stay sovent and not ruin the state economies that were heavy cotton producers hemp products were being verbally labelled inferior. The next phase of the cotton industry was to loudly associate hemp with its sister plant.

Cotton won, hemp was erased as a useable product.

13 posted on 09/08/2001 12:18:11 PM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TBall
I just did a quick search on hemp and its potential uses are fascinating.


Yeah, the North American Industrial Hemp Council (NAIHC) identifies all sorts of useful hemp products. They also have a great quote on that web page from the 1938 issue of Popular Mechanics: "Over 25,000 products can be manufactured from hemp, from cellophane to dynamite."

That was 1938. I can't help but wonder what that number would be today. Better yet, all products are much stronger than when made with "modern" materials. You cannot hardly even tare hemp paper.

14 posted on 09/08/2001 12:26:23 PM PDT by Doug Fiedor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: forest
If I smell marijuana burning, it aggravates my nose and I start sneezing if I don't quickly get away from the smoke. But, it's out in nature where it really gets to me. When it's damp out, like on a misty morning, I seem to be able to smell that stuff a quarter-mile away. Then, I really start with the sneezing and coughing.

And I thought the Illegal Drug Freedom Fighter Thugs were trying to find some so-called "medical" reason for their habit. So much for that argument - they sure know how to shoot themselves in the foot, so to speak - eh?

15 posted on 09/08/2001 12:43:21 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TKEman
Well, times are a'changin. Hang tight for a couple of years, and keep up the pressure. We'll soon see changes north and south of the United States.

Your gonna hafta convince all of the antismoking extremists to drop all past, present, and future charges. You don't have a prayer.

Maybe it's your timing that sucks...

16 posted on 09/08/2001 12:47:03 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Aren't there other ways to ingest marijuana besides smoking it?
17 posted on 09/08/2001 12:53:39 PM PDT by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: forest
Which "state" does he keep referring to? The state of perpetual befuddlement?
18 posted on 09/08/2001 12:55:00 PM PDT by Whilom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
HEY, IT'S ANOTHER POT HEAD THREAD ABOUT LEGALIZING THEIR ADDICTION! SO PATHETIC!

Please explain why some people's addictions should be illegal, while not others.

19 posted on 09/08/2001 12:56:36 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: forest
The "excuse" Commonwealth Legislators give for not approving the cultivation of industrial hemp in this State as a cash crop is that police say they cannot tell the difference between the industrial and the smoking kind. That is silliness personified, of course.

Industrial hemp is labor intensive and even where its legal to grow and labor is cheap it has to be subsidized by the government.

20 posted on 09/08/2001 1:00:14 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-247 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson