Posted on 09/08/2001 6:54:30 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Every day police are out there risking their lives for you and me. Or are they really? And what urgent difference does it make to you, your sisters, your daughters, and friends?
Before reading any further, try this quick test. Rank the following six occupations according to their rate of on-the-job fatalities, starting from the most dangerous to the least dangerous: air pilot, police officer, truck driver, electrician, construction laborer, gardener (non-farm). Chances are, if you've ever watched TV, or listened to cops defend their conduct, or read newspaper editorials supporting the police, or heard broadcasts of the funeral orations in memory of a slain officer, or just plain lived on the planet, chances are you flunked the test royally.
Here is the correct ranking from the U.S. Department of Labor, along with a few other occupations to give you an idea of the range.
U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Fatalities per 100,000 Year 1999 |
|
Commercial Fishermen
|
162
|
Timber Cutters
|
154
|
Air Pilots
|
65
|
Construction Laborers
|
37
|
Garbage Collectors
|
34
|
Truck Drivers
|
28
|
Electricians
|
12
|
Gardeners (non farm)
|
11
|
Police
|
11
|
Carpenters
|
7
|
So the real deal is this, police officers don't lay their lives on the line any more than the person who plants the petunias on your patio. The numbers vary some from year to year, but the ranking of fatality rates remains basically the same as you see it here.
It's said that you can't fool all the people all of the time, yet this highly exaggerated myth of the dangerousness of police work has come pretty close to doing just that. The entire American public has been bamboozled with this myth for a very long time. As you can see just from the abbreviated list of occupations above, many, many other workers, including many who work in public service, suffer far higher fatality rates than police. And when, for example, the city gardener dies on the job serving you, there's no fanfare, no flags flown at half mast, no five foot flower monuments flown in from near and far. No motorcycle caravans of gardeners swarming into the funeral from seven neighboring states. No headlines at the top of the news for three days running. No city and state officials clamoring for a place to mourn at the casket.
What is it with the police? Their familiar refrains are known in every town and hamlet of the nation. "Our wives have to worry everyday whether of not we're going to come home at night." Doesn't the gardener's spouse have to worry just as much? "We never speak out against another cop, because we depend on each other for our lives." Don't gardeners depend on each other when rock walls shift, structures collapse, or machinery turns rogue? Of course they do, just as much, and as often, and as life-and-death, as the police.
But different from gardeners, police have immense powers over people, and too often can misuse that power to create myths to get more power. Here's a couple of first thoughts to start the debate as to why this myth of police dangerousness exists and how it harms our communities.
There's a couple other facts that should be taken into account. The majority of police on-the-job fatalities are not caused by bad guys shooting at the cops. The majority if police on-the-job fatalities are cause by vehicle accidents.
And maybe this next fact is most pertinent of all to the question of how, and why, and what difference it makes who society selects for its heroes. Although the Department of Labor doesn't include motherhood as an occupation, other national studies show that childbearing in the U.S. has a fatality rate on a par with policing.
And what heartless person would deny them the right to burn people alive?
The fact that you have resorted to making racist, sexist slurs rather than attempting to refute the statistics says volumes about you, sink.
Thanks for showing so your true colors.
The statistics are per 100,000 of each you idiot.
And if you want to refute them, do your own frieking research.
And here I thought only Democrats would expect the opposition to do their work for them.
I believe its skyrocketing!
Did you read the mission statement of the Women's Justice Center? They are dedicated to doing all they can to get Latin women hired into law enforcement.
Naturally, they want to play down the "danger" angle to law enforcement. It helps their cause.
Here. The author says as much:
The supposed danger of police work is one of the main reasons women give for not going into policing. Women loose out on a great job, and communities lose out on the exceptional skills women bring to the job, not the least of which is dramatically lower rates of excessive use of force, and the better communication skills that de-escalate violence and save lives.
Or, how about this:
The myth of the dangerousness of policing keeps police wives scared to death and under control. How do you get up the nerve to insist that the warrior hero who faces death around every corner do his share of scrubbing the bathroom floor?
Feminist claptrap!
I will rephrase the question using smaller words if you need me to.
U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Fatalities per 100,000 Year 1999 |
|
Commercial Fishermen
|
162
|
Timber Cutters
|
154
|
Air Pilots
|
65
|
Construction Laborers
|
37
|
Garbage Collectors
|
34
|
Truck Drivers
|
28
|
Electricians
|
12
|
Gardeners (non farm)
|
11
|
Police
|
11
|
Carpenters
|
7
|
I'd be more interested in comparing their IQs. I bet the gardeners would win.
More fishermen die on the job than garbage collectors, or electricians, or police.
Your point?
Your point?
The point is, cops are not laying their lives on the line every day, any more than your common ordinary gardener.
Or, as that well-known radicalized feminist Latina, Maria De Santis would say:
"By cultivating a hyper-inflated myth of heroes sacrificing their lives for you, police have created a shield of public veneration to defend against criticism of any misdeed. Who then can blame police for building arsenals against the citizens, for firing at first blink, for mafia-like codes of silence? Who then can refuse police funding requests for ever more militarized arms?"
And what heartless person would deny them the right to burn people alive?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.