Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In final Clinton days, a chance to attack bin Laden was rejected
Associated Press | September 13, 2001 | JOHN SOLOMON

Posted on 09/12/2001 10:40:45 PM PDT by HAL9000

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In the waning days of the Clinton presidency, senior officials received specific intelligence about the whereabouts of Osama bin Laden and weighed a military plan to strike the suspected terrorist mastermind's location. The administration ultimately opted against an attack.

The information spurred a high-level debate inside the White House in December 2000 about whether the classified information provided the last best chance for President Clinton to punish bin Laden before he left office, the officials said.

Now nine months later, officials are discussing the incident as bin Laden's name increasingly is being connected with Tuesday's suicide attacks in New York and Washington.

Some in Congress have expressed anger that the United States has not been able to put bin Laden more on the defensive in Afghanistan with military strikes after years of intelligence linking him to global acts of terrorism against Americans.

"We should have put bin Laden on the defensive so he would be thinking about how we are going to get him rather than him plotting massive terrorist plots,'' Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, said.

Officials said the Clinton administration in its closing months reviewed several opportunities to possibly strike at bin Laden, but never felt they had enough information to risk such an operation.

"There were a couple of points, including in December, where there was intelligence indicative of bin Laden's whereabouts. But I can categorically tell you that at no point was it ripe enough to act,'' former National Security Adviser Sandy Berger told The Associated Press.

Officials said the December meeting was the most pointed in a series of discussions over several months. Several officials familiar with the debate said top military and national security officials convened in the White House to discuss the options.

One individual familiar with the discussions, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the meeting was prompted by "eyes-on intelligence'' about bin Laden's whereabouts -- a term used to indicate a human or satellite spotting.

According to officials:

--Military officials presented a possible military strike option, and the pros and cons were debated.

--Among the concerns voiced was whether the intelligence wasn't already stale given bin Laden's tendency to move quickly and go into hiding. There also was discussion of possible collateral damage if such an attack occurred.

--Ultimately, the president and aides decided not to strike. Berger and one other official said military officials never made a formal recommendation to proceed with the attack.

"There was never a recommendation from the Pentagon,'' Berger said.

Military strikes were aimed at bin Laden once before. After U.S. embassies were bombed in Africa three years ago, Washington retaliated with a missile attack in August 1998, sending more than 70 Tomahawk cruise missiles into eastern Afghanistan targeting training camps operated by bin Laden.

The U.S. attacks killed about 20 followers but bin Laden escaped unhurt. Since then he has been forced by Afghanistan's Taliban rulers to stop giving interviews and making statements.

Copyright 2001 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2001 10:40:45 PM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Cowardly clinton does nothing again. HERE he could have done something useful instead of bombing asprin factories. Nah, not bill. Most likely he's got drug money coming in from him too.
2 posted on 09/12/2001 10:43:28 PM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
The slickster was probably too busy tallying up all the money he was going to make on the sale of pardons. Couldn't be bothered with matters of state and national security.
3 posted on 09/12/2001 10:45:51 PM PDT by AlaskaErik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Just heard this on Fox. Unbelievable.
4 posted on 09/12/2001 10:46:09 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miss marple
FYI
5 posted on 09/12/2001 10:47:15 PM PDT by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
From another thread...

Time to check if Bin Laden donated to the DNC.
His family gave to Harvard. Want to bet, some $$$$ went to the DNC?

Anyone?

6 posted on 09/12/2001 10:52:04 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
I've been saying it for a while. Clinton did a similar chicken-out in Somalia with Aidid- Aidid had no idea how close he was to judgement day.
7 posted on 09/12/2001 10:53:33 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin, Dog, Irma, Hillary's Lovely Legs
Research project?
8 posted on 09/12/2001 10:53:45 PM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
In any large scale operation there turn out to be certain key personnel that multiply its successes by a factor of ten. It was Rommel in Africa. When troops began to move incisively at Normandy, the German high command knew immediately that Patton had been given charge. If bin Laden is taken out it won stop hostilities, but it will render them much less effective.
9 posted on 09/12/2001 10:53:51 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
Didn't he and Marc Rich have ties?
10 posted on 09/12/2001 10:54:13 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Oh, be still my heart!
11 posted on 09/12/2001 10:59:09 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: piasa
If so, I'd love to hear about it.
12 posted on 09/12/2001 10:59:24 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter, kayak
I'm SOOOOOOOOOO glad this came out now. Now if "he" gets back from Australia and tries to stick his fat face in front of a camera, they can ask him why HE didn't take care of this when he had the chance. Of course, the answer is he didn't have anything TO COVER UP at that time, did he?
13 posted on 09/12/2001 11:00:48 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"The administration ultimately opted against an attack. "

"never felt they had enough information to risk such an operation. "

C'mon now AP, let's be honest. We all know it was because Bill knew it would blow any chance of winning that Nobel.

14 posted on 09/12/2001 11:01:34 PM PDT by Not_Who_U_Think
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Yeah, but we'd have been the first ones screaming here that it was nothing more than an exercise in legacy building. I know I would have.
15 posted on 09/12/2001 11:01:55 PM PDT by Dahoser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
fyi...Marc Rich & Sin Laden?
16 posted on 09/12/2001 11:01:55 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
What is your source for information that Osama Bin Ladins family gave money to Harvard. And did Harvard accept it? I cannot believe even the extremist libs at harvard would do such a thing.
17 posted on 09/12/2001 11:02:19 PM PDT by Libertina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000 rightintexas Alamo-Girl
ping!
18 posted on 09/12/2001 11:03:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
Just heard this on Fox. Unbelievable.

Clinton sold us out in nearly every possible way. Believe it.

19 posted on 09/12/2001 11:04:32 PM PDT by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Seemed like on one of the guild threads there was something about Marc Rich and Osama.
20 posted on 09/12/2001 11:04:51 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson