Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DISINFORMATION? CBS Report: Clinton Targeted Bin Laden
CBS ^ | Sept. 16, 2001 | ©MMI, CBS Worldwide Inc.

Posted on 09/17/2001 3:41:47 AM PDT by Liz

But An Attempt On Bin Laden's Life Failed
(CBS) CBS 60 Minutes Correspondent Lesley Stahl reports that there are indications that President Clinton ordered Osama bin Laden's apprehension or death, and that there was a failed attempt on bin Laden's life last year.

Here are the details: Following the attacks on the U.S. embassies in Africa in August 1998, President Clinton signed a directive authorizing the CIA to apprehend bin Laden and bring him to the United States to stand trial for his role in the bombings.

The directive, which was modified several times, authorized the use of deadly force if taking bin Laden alive was deemed impossible. And in fact, according to government sources, non-Americans (we don't know what nationality) working on behalf of the CIA tried to kill bin Laden last year.

These foreign operatives told the CIA they fired a rocket-propelled grenade at bin Laden as he drove in a convoy of cars through a mountainous road in Afghanistan, and that the grenade hit one of the vehicles -- though not the one bin Laden was in.

According to CBS News sources, members of the House and Senate intelligence committees were notified of both the presidential directive and the attempt on bin Laden's life.

CBS News has been told that the Clinton administration got around the long-time ban on government assassinations by coming up with a so-called "self-defense exception." The idea is that lethal force could be used against someone who either poses an imminent threat on U.S. national security or personnel, or has attacked U.S. interests in the past and is deemed likely to do so again.

As to why this story is getting out only now, Stahl suggests it might be that "there are people in Washington who want the American people to know they have not been asleep at the wheel in the war on terrorism and, even though there may have been some failures, they have been trying." ©MMI, CBS Worldwide Inc. All Rights Reserved


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
Let's see the directive......
1 posted on 09/17/2001 3:41:47 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Liz
CBS News has been told that the Clinton administration got around the long-time ban on government assassinations by coming up with a so-called "self-defense exception."

Is that anything like the non-existent "Clinton Rule" that the Stanislaus County DA used to avoid pressing subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice charges against Gary Condit?

2 posted on 09/17/2001 3:45:24 AM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a rapist
CBS News has been told that the Clinton administration got around the long-time ban on government assassinations by coming up with a so-called "self-defense exception."

I thought the ban was an executive order. In that case, why would they have needed a so-called "self-defense exception"? They could have simply revoked the executive order, I would think.

3 posted on 09/17/2001 3:48:45 AM PDT by calvin sun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Perhaps the directive is in the LIBRARY papers, along with those missing Kennedy Center appointments, and some billing papers . I suggest that Clintont get down there and busy himself finding the papers. That will give him something productive to do.
4 posted on 09/17/2001 3:48:56 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a rapist
According to CBS News sources, members of the House and Senate intelligence committees
were notified of both the presidential directive and the attempt on bin Laden's life.

House Intel Committee?

Was that before the Condit/Chandra escapade or after Condit and the flight attendant's go-round?

Either way our House Intel Committee was busy at the time.

5 posted on 09/17/2001 3:50:06 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Liz
This is why the reprobate had to get back to NY from Australia the other day. First he had to try to upstage W and then he had to start spinning the stories for his legacy. Can't wait for his book. Not.
6 posted on 09/17/2001 3:51:09 AM PDT by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Funny we're hearing about it only now.
7 posted on 09/17/2001 3:52:09 AM PDT by rvoitier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Perhaps the directive is in the LIBRARY papers, along with those
missing Kennedy Center appointments, and some billing papers.

Maybe Hillary's got it?

Then again, what did Hillary know and when did she know it?

8 posted on 09/17/2001 3:53:06 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
Funny we're hearing about it only now.

Funny. But I'm not laughing. Are you?

9 posted on 09/17/2001 3:54:01 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Liz
If Clinton had seriously tried to get Bin Laden, Bin Laden would have exposed Clinton's immoral personal life and ruined him politically at the time. This is nothing more than a CBS cover-up of Clinton's failures in hopes of keeping Hillary's potential run for president alive.
10 posted on 09/17/2001 3:54:44 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
WHAT A CROCK !!!

The Klintoon mob is trying to pre-empt the truth -- that they took a 'hands off' attitude to terrorism, because it was too much like real work!

Madeleine Albright said we should support (train) the KLA so they could defend themselves -- while it was well known that they are funded by bin Laden, and share the drug trade.

Evil Willie is culpable as Hell in this !

11 posted on 09/17/2001 3:55:20 AM PDT by Ed_in_NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calvin sun
I thought the ban was an executive order. In that case, why would they have needed a so-called "self-defense exception"? They could have simply revoked the executive order, I would think.

I believe so. I think that was one of the first things Bush did after Tuesday's attack.

12 posted on 09/17/2001 3:55:57 AM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Liz
CBS 60 Minutes Correspondent Lesley Stahl reports...

...and that's all I need to read to conclude that this BS has been manufactured by the Clinton Machine and dutifully "reported" by the Faithful in the media.

13 posted on 09/17/2001 3:56:10 AM PDT by Fintan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
First he had to try to upstage W and then he had to start spinning the stories for his legacy.

Guess the "How I Almost Killed bin Laden" chapter is a late addition to the entire lie his book will be.

14 posted on 09/17/2001 3:56:31 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: connectthedots
....nothing more than a CBS cover-up of Clinton's failures in
hopes of keeping Hillary's potential run for president alive.

Amen.

15 posted on 09/17/2001 3:58:12 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I posted this on another thread!

As to why this story is getting out only now, Stahl suggests it might be that "there are people in Washington who want the American people to know they have not been asleep at the wheel in the war on terrorism and, even though there may have been some failures, they have been trying."

I think this might be the REAL reason this "report" (planted, no doubt) is "getting out" now is because of this article:

Clinton rejected military strike on bin Laden

Or this one:

Report: Clinton Nixed Hit on Bin Laden

Or this one:

In final Clinton days, a chance to attack bin Laden was rejected

Both Hillary and Bill Clinton were asked about these very reports last week LIVE on TV; that's why you're reading this CBS drivel!

6 Posted on 09/17/2001 03:49:34 PDT by Howlin

16 posted on 09/17/2001 3:58:32 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
LOL>......perhaps it is.

Dang, this has started my whole day with a rage!

17 posted on 09/17/2001 3:59:40 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Headline correction:

CLITON WHINES: DON'T BLAME ME

18 posted on 09/17/2001 4:00:25 AM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Yeah, I can just picture Bubba phoning in the last-minute instruction to his ghost writer: "And, you know, just put in a chapter where I try to go after bin Laden. Say I was distracted by Impeachment or, you know, whatever."
19 posted on 09/17/2001 4:00:55 AM PDT by Clinton's a rapist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rvoitier
See #16........I listed a FEW of the articles from last week about this..........and there are MORE.

This is a PACK of lies.

20 posted on 09/17/2001 4:01:03 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson