Skip to comments.
China wants UN approval for US action
muzi news ^
| 09/18/01
Posted on 09/17/2001 4:42:39 PM PDT by Bald Eagle
China wants UN approval for US action
LatelineNews: 2001-9-18] BEIJING - China will demand UN approval for any US military intervention in Afghanistan, amid concerns over the expansion of US and NATO influence among its South and Central Asian neighbors, analysts said Monday.
But whatever its qualms about a response to Tuesday's terror attacks on the United States, Beijing would not use its veto in the UN Security Council on the matter, analysts were quoted by AFP as saying.
"China usually relies on the United Nations and anything decided outside the United Nations may be opposed or criticized by China," said Jean-Pierre Cabestan, director of the Hong Kong-based French Center for Research on Contemporary China.
"There will be some sort of cooperation (between China and the United States) and we will see very quickly the limitations of this cooperation ... but on the whole China won't veto anything and will try not to become too involved," he said.
However, Cabestan cautioned that without a clear idea of exactly what the US had planned, it was very difficult to predict China's reaction.
"The danger for China is that the US becomes more involved in South Asia and there will be more US troops closer to its borders," he told AFP.
China bristled at the lack of UN approval for NATO's intervention into Yugoslavia in 1999, viewing it as intervention in another country's internal affairs and a possible precedent for Western action in Tibet or Xinjiang, where separatism abounds, or over Taiwan.
But according to Joseph Cheng, a leading China scholar at the City University of Hong Kong, US intervention in Afghanistan would be a far cry from Yugoslavia, especially as China had already condemned the terrorist attacks and pledged to cooperate with the US.
"China would like to involve the United Nations which it views as a very useful tool for urging restraint, but I don't think China will exercise its UN veto, although it may choose to abstain," Cheng said.
China would also be looking to the possible visit this week by Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf for consultations on a united front between the close allies, as well as seeking a first hand understanding on how Islamabad planned to cooperate with Washington, Cheng said.
"China certainly would first indicate support for Musharraf and also support Pakistani efforts seeking respect for its territorial integrity and Musharraf's decision on how to handle Osama bin Laden," he said.
Pakistan, a long-time traditional ally of China, has urged Afghanistan's Taliban regime to arrest Saudi dissident bin Laden and has pledged "full support" to a US-led campaign against international terrorism.
China's concern over the spread of Islamic extremism and terrorism in its remote western Xinjiang region and the level of Russian support and cooperation would also play a central role in how Beijing reacts, Cabestan said.
The fight against terrorism on its central Asian borders has been a main concern of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which groups China with Russia, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazahkstan and Uzbekistan, since the group was established in 1996.
"China has been using the Shanghai group to fight terrorism, so this has opened the door to some kind of cooperation with the United States," he said.
However, Beijing's efforts to use the group to prevent the influx of Muslim refugees into China and to urge other member governments to prevent the growth of Xinjiang Uighur separatist groups outside of China, has so far "not been very effective", Cabestan said.
"The outside factor is Russia. If Russia decides to cooperate with the United States, this will put pressure on China. So the Russian factor is important as far as China is concerned," Cabestan said.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Will someone tell China to shut the He!! up.
Are they going to seek UN approval before they try to force themselves on Taiwan or the next time they decide the want some more land from Vietnam or the Philippines?
To: Bald Eagle
China can kiss my SKS
2
posted on
09/17/2001 4:46:58 PM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: Bald Eagle
Hey, China can propose anything it wants in the UN. That's its right. That's what the UN is there for--to be a stage where any nincompoop can pound the table with a shoe.
Meanwhile, we'll do what we intend to do, with or without the blessing of friend or foe.
3
posted on
09/17/2001 4:47:31 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Bald Eagle
Now that Clinton is out of the way, we no longer have a President who is going to kiss the collective asses of the Red Chinese and the nincompoops who prance around the U.N. Praise God for that.
To: Bald Eagle
I don't remember them seeking UN approval to hold out plane and people captive earlier this year.
To: Bald Eagle, tallhappy, Severnside, Hopalong
I believe that China is a player in this. I can just feel it. Any comments gang?
6
posted on
09/17/2001 4:53:56 PM PDT
by
eureka!
To: Bald Eagle
This is a very good example of the foolishness of trying to develop a "coalition." The more countries you attempt to drag in, the more conditional and watered down the response becomes.
To: Bald Eagle
Why should China not be considered part of this problem? Because they have nuclear weapons? Is this not a life or death struggle for the US? Or is it yet still a game?
8
posted on
09/17/2001 5:08:24 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Bald Eagle
Who cares what a communist country says?
9
posted on
09/17/2001 5:15:47 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: Bald Eagle
Swell. I smell the State Dept. building concensus for a UN led coalition. China...Russia...US...whoever.
If the executive branch is hampered on one end of it's stick, guess which other end it has to use. I knew I wouldn't like this when I read the title.
BOHICA
10
posted on
09/17/2001 5:18:15 PM PDT
by
martian_22
(bend over here it comes again)
To: all
I could not care less what China wants. They performed their own terrorism on our plane in April, forcing it down while it was still in international waters, and holding our military personnel hostage. Who are they to preach to us on this of all subjects? And like the above poster, when (not if) they attack Taiwan, will they consult the UN about it? Of course not. China, you're not a superpower, just an enemy of the US. Most Americans have known this since Tiannemen Square. Either help us or, more preferably, BUTT OUT !!!!
11
posted on
09/17/2001 5:21:09 PM PDT
by
Malcolm
To: eureka!
Well them signing on with the Taliban the day after this happens does kinda indicate you're on to something.
To: Bald Eagle
Dear China,
K sera sera... things will be as things will be!!!To bad you are the worst of the worst an your people are ok,
so good luck in your Pagen bid...
13
posted on
09/17/2001 5:22:33 PM PDT
by
Tigen
To: Bald Eagle
Not once since this began have I heard the phrase "UN" uttered by anyone in this administration.
Someone needs to tell China that dog ain't gonna hunt.
14
posted on
09/17/2001 5:24:42 PM PDT
by
Cable225
To: eureka!
In all my reading of history , hidden history , current events and trying to understand what could happen in the future- China always remained the 'wild card'. I don't think many Americans understand the Chinese mind, the concept of losing/saving 'face'. Does the bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade come home to roost? Is it an opportune time to re-patriate Taiwan? ( it sure is in a little while), fasten your seatbelt folks!!
15
posted on
09/17/2001 5:25:48 PM PDT
by
Clint_E
To: a_federalist
Re #12. Dohp! Of course. Those flagged make for interesting historical/strategic/cultural discussions and, in light of the Taliban link, what's in it for the Reds. Gotta run, have a great night...
16
posted on
09/17/2001 5:28:15 PM PDT
by
eureka!
To: NoControllingLegalAuthority
Exactly!
17
posted on
09/17/2001 5:29:18 PM PDT
by
kaylar
To: Clint_E
The Chinese embassy bombing was not an accident. Slobo was using it. Thank goodness that some spook/patriots found an "old map" to use for targeting to give cover. Clinton was probably really p#ssed on that one. As to China, they are patient and have a big plan. Where does this fit in is the question...
18
posted on
09/17/2001 5:32:14 PM PDT
by
eureka!
To: Bald Eagle
As I read, it's the analyst's oppinion, not the Chinese official stance. I dont't China will say that themselve. China can tell third world countries to do that.
19
posted on
09/17/2001 5:32:58 PM PDT
by
Lake
To: eureka!
>>As to China, they are patient and have a big plan.
Right. China is very patient.
20
posted on
09/17/2001 5:35:02 PM PDT
by
Lake
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson