Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

War Myths (what not to believe)
National Revue Online ^ | Sept. 20, 2001 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 09/21/2001 3:54:46 PM PDT by Nachum

1. We have incurred legitimate hatred from the radical Islamic states.

Nothing could be further from truth. The Taliban, the mullahs in Iran, and other assorted fundamentalists despise the United States for its culture and envy it for its power. The wealth, technology, and freedom of America's global culture — from bare navels to the Internet — have challenged fundamentalists, who are wedded to a medieval world of perpetual stasis. That terrorists use frequent-flyer miles and cell phones to kill us only sharpens that paradox, and accentuates their dual sentiments of envy and inadequacy. For the record, in the last ten years, the United States freed the Arab and Islamic state of Kuwait, opposed Saddam Hussein and his murder of Islamic Kurds and Shiites, prevented Muslim Afghanistan from becoming a Soviet satrapy, and saved the Muslims of Bosnia and Kosovo from extinction — as European and "moderate" Arab states watched the carnage of their neighbors and kin. The majority of the terrorists that surround bin Laden are from the upper and middle classes of Arab society, are highly educated, and are driven to murder by hatred and envy, not hunger or exploitation. They are a world apart from the starving in South America and Africa, who do not crash airliners into office towers. These terrorists hate us for who we are, not what we have done.

2. The Arab and Muslim worlds are formidable.

In fact, despite being over a billion strong, they are not monolithic and are at their weakest since the 15th or 16th century. There is not a single Arab democracy, nor one truly free populace. Like the Ottomans of the past, who made poor copies of Venetian cannon, so too the fundamentalists are parasitic upon Western culture, their societies unable to mass-produce, or even create, a single one of the weapons they employ. The economies of the larger Muslim world — from Indonesia and Iran to Lebanon and Palestine — are in shambles, ruined by either autocracy or theocracy. Moreover, new coalitions are emerging that will only further isolate Muslim states, in which even mainstream clerics and intellectuals have not successfully reconciled the unfettered dynamism of global capitalism and technology with the doctrines of the Koran. In response, the United States will gradually gravitate toward tough nuclear powers like Russia and India, whose secular democracies have long-standing affinities with the West — and deep enmity toward Islamic fundamentalism.

3. The moderate Arab countries are our friends.

We also need to revisit the myth of the "moderate" Arab countries. Most are moderate in only a relative sense, the way an opportunist like Franco was a moderate fascist in comparison to Hitler, or a wily Tito a moderate Communist as opposed to Stalin. We must accept the bitter truth that states like Palestine, Egypt, Syria, and others — despite American deference and occasional aid — are not our friends, much less our allies. Their citizens do not vote freely; their media is controlled and censored; women are not fully liberated, if at all; and they are growing less, not more, tolerant of religious and cultural diversity. While the United States should not gratuitously incite societies like Jordan (a supporter of Iraq in the Gulf War), Egypt, or Saudi Arabia, we must reexamine our relationships with them — from military assistance to foreign aid to travel and immigration. One of the more frustrating facets of the American media has been their reluctance (or inability) to show the grassroots celebration — going on in the streets of Palestine, Pakistan, Egypt, and other countries — of 6,000 American deaths. We should pay close attention to what the upscale parents of the terrorists now profess to European journalists: They may well be representative of Arab "moderates" in Egypt and Lebanon, and yet, with perfect consistency, either deny their progeny's involvement, spin myths about CIA conspiracies, or suggest that the attacks were warranted.

4. Fundamentalist terrorism cannot be eliminated.

This fear too is erroneous. Terrorist organizations like bin Laden's, the Hezbollah, and Islamic Jihad are not as formidable as either German Nazism or Japanese militarism, both of which were exterminated within five years of America going to war and have not plagued the planet since. The Waffen SS, Gestapo, the Kamikazes, and the Japanese army at Bataan were all more horrific than the Taliban. Terrorism is a tumor with tentacles, but these can be excised by frequent and continued air strikes, coupled with sudden ground incursions and ongoing counterinsurgency. The hosts can be given a series of ongoing ultimatums: to surrender suspects, demolish camps, and cease monetary support — or face the month-by-month, systematic destruction of their military assets, banks, and communications. Add in financial, economic, and cultural ostracism, and terrorism can and will be crushed — if the United States is willing to give treasure and lives for the greater good and for our children's future.

5. The crisis is an international problem.

In theory, of course it is, and we should welcome assistance from our traditional allies and enlist indigenous resistance groups in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the United States must be prepared to act alone, especially as casualties mount and terrorist reprisals increase. Nor should we welcome alliances with past terrorist culprits that will haunt us later and erode the moral high ground.

The United Nations is not only as impotent as the old League of Nations, but lacks the former's idealism and has become ever more morally bankrupt. Once the fighting starts, despite initial pledges of support, the Europeans will probably extend words of encouragement but lend no real material or military assistance of any value. We cannot expect the French to remember Normandy Beach or the Germans the Berlin airlift. Indeed, most Europeans have already forgotten American intervention on their doorstep to stop the recent holocaust in the Balkans. We should neither lament nor be angered by their hypocrisy, but rather expect it, and realize what a different country America is and always has been compared to its European allies. We must be ready to be lectured by the Swedes who passed on World War II, ignored by the Swiss who profited from it, and hectored by the French who nearly lost it. America needs and welcomes friends, but the absence of such should not deter our response to avenge our own dead and protect our innocent.

6. War has never solved anything.

Quite the contrary. The three greatest scourges of the 20th century — Nazism, Japanese militarism, and Soviet Communism — were defeated through war or continued military resistance. More were killed by Hitler, Stalin, and Mao outside of combat than died in World Wars I and II. War, as Sherman said, is all hell, but as Heraclitus admitted it is also "the father of us all." Wickedness — whether chattel slavery, the gas chambers, or concentration camps — has rarely passed quietly into the night on its own. The present evil isn't going to either.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Ready for war?
1 posted on 09/21/2001 3:54:46 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
In fact, despite being over a billion strong, they are not monolithic and are at their weakest since the 15th or 16th century.

I'd say that in many ways they Arab/Islamic World is almost as weak as it was right after WW1.

2 posted on 09/21/2001 3:59:33 PM PDT by JAWs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum, Utah Girl, Pete-R-Bilt, Euro-American Scum
bumpin und pingin. excellent article.
3 posted on 09/21/2001 4:09:52 PM PDT by glock rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The myths you analyze are exactly what the leftist professors said at a forum we had on my campus! They are desperate to find reasons why we should NOT react in a vigorous manner. Dr. Z
4 posted on 09/21/2001 4:39:14 PM PDT by conservativeprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glock rocks
Thanks for the ping. I've been able to use these facts quite effectively today.
5 posted on 09/21/2001 4:44:34 PM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
it has to be done and we should never let our guard down again! 6000+ deaths on the clinton's hands.
6 posted on 09/21/2001 4:52:07 PM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
> The Taliban, the mullahs in Iran, and other assorted fundamentalists despise the United States for its culture and envy it for its power.

Whatever the merits of the rest of the article, this simple-minded statement makes a mockery of the writer and any reader that believes it. Maybe the mullahs in Iran are a little upset at the fact that the U.S. and Britain took down a democratically elected Iranian government (Dr. Mohammed Mossadegh) and re-installed the Sha (Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi).

A Sha that rewarded U.S. and British oil companies with 40% of Iran's oil business each. A Shah that created the hated SAVAK secret police which imprisoned, beat, tortured and killed any political opposition in Iran (BTW, Norman Schwartzkopf Sr. had a leading role in the overthrow of the democratic Iranian government and in the creation of the SAVAK). A Shah that virtually bankrupted his country and was finally overthrown by the Iranians, again, in 1979. This is just one example of our fight for democracy and freedom in the middle east.

> These terrorists hate us for who we are, not what we have done.

Got any more fairy tales?

7 posted on 09/21/2001 4:59:55 PM PDT by John Deere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Deere, Lent, Thinkin Gal, sabramerican, rebdov. dennisw
Did the SAVAK murder 6000 at a clip?

How many did the Ayatollah execute?

8 posted on 09/21/2001 5:37:35 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Deere
The Shah didn't bankrupt Iran and the Mullahs are no improvement on him
9 posted on 09/21/2001 5:53:37 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
>Did the SAVAK murder 6000 at a clip?

Does it make things any better to know that the SAVAK mostly killed its victims one at a time? But that's not really the point is it? The point is the author's assertion that we, the U.S. of A., have done nothing that deserves our being hated for. I have just provided one uncontrovertible example that we have inded done something that might piss most reasonable people off.

> How many did the Ayatollah execute?

Quite a number. The question is, would the Ayatollah have come to power in a democratic Iran? Would the Ayatollah have executed people if we had not toppled Iran's democratically elected government in 1953?

10 posted on 09/21/2001 6:01:59 PM PDT by John Deere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Muslims have been on a power-trip ever since that wild night in Constantinople. Someone should tell 'em the party's over.
11 posted on 09/21/2001 6:25:29 PM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Deere
Yes that's right. If the U.S. hadn't interfered with these Islamic regimes, they would now be wonderful democracies and world leaders in technology and medical discoveries. Who's the dreamer? The truth is that without the West and it's superior civilization, these countries would be as backward as they now presently are or much worse.
12 posted on 09/21/2001 7:43:05 PM PDT by driftless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: John Deere
The answer to your question is "yes". The Ayatollah would have murdered just as many when the radical Islamics came to power. Mayber a lot more if they came to power sooner.
13 posted on 09/22/2001 9:47:32 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Yep! "Lets Roll"

Great artical. Some great info in a brief form. Thx

14 posted on 09/24/2001 12:28:36 PM PDT by CyberCowboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
They would have a lot less if we would quit funding them. We've got to drill in Alaska. We fund terrorists when we buy oil from the Middle East.
15 posted on 09/24/2001 12:43:27 PM PDT by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Nachum
4. Fundamentalist terrorism cannot be eliminated.

Well, a fellow named Assad didn't do too badly on that score at a little place named Hama not too long ago. That was the town from which a fundamentalist movement was threatening the takeover of Syria.

Assad had the place shelled by artillery for four straight days, then bulldozed. Left it that way as an example. Hasn't had a problem since...

17 posted on 09/24/2001 12:55:40 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Deere
The point is the author's assertion that we, the U.S. of A., have done nothing that deserves our being hated for. I have just provided one uncontrovertible example that we have inded done something that might piss most reasonable people off.

Your posts just pissed me off. By your very own reasoning, if I beat the Holy Hell out of you for it, you couldn't complain, fight back, or call the cops, because you brought it on yourself by pissing me off.

Will you keep this attitude while you struggle to pick your teeth off the ground with broken arms?

If so, please mail me your address and phone number so that I can administer this justifiable beating to you.

18 posted on 09/24/2001 1:02:59 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Bumpity bump bump bump!
19 posted on 09/24/2001 1:11:02 PM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Deere
And you are what we call a Monday-morning quarterback.
20 posted on 09/24/2001 1:11:42 PM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson