Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror
http://www.frontpagemagazine.com ^ | October 4, 2001 | Jamie Glazov

Posted on 10/04/2001 10:48:55 AM PDT by AZLiberty

The Sexual Rage Behind Islamic Terror

FrontPageMagazine.com | October 4, 2001

ALL SERIAL KILLERS, almost without exception, are severely sexually abused as children. The kind of people who hijack a plane with innocent people and drive it into a building with thousands of other innocent people are related to this phenomenon.

When sociopaths rape and kill, they do not see their victims as human beings, but only as objects. This is because the sociopaths were themselves, at one time, used as objects – as their bodily integrity was repeatedly violated. The rage that results from sexual abuse is one thing, but when combined with living in a dysfunctional culture of sexual repression and misogyny, where love is reduced to violent domination, it is quite another.

Throughout the Islamic Middle East, men and women are taught to be vehemently opposed to pleasure, especially of the sexual variety. Men are raised not only forbidden to touch women, but to even look at them. Sex before marriage is not just a sin -- but a criminal offence. It is punishable by a severe beating at best, and an execution at worst.

The sexual privileges that are allowed in Islamic cultures are permitted to men. Women’s sexuality and social independence represent major threats to male supremacy and are tightly controlled. Thus, as the Moroccan feminist Fitna Sabbah reveals in her book Woman in the Muslim Unconscious, there is a disturbing conflict in the Middle East between sexual libido and repression. A deep-seated fear of, and hostility to, individuality prevails, and its main expression exists in misogyny.

Socially segregated from women, Arab men succumb to homosexual behavior. But, interestingly enough, there is no word for "homosexual" in their culture in the modern Western sense. That is because having sex with boys, or with effeminate men, is seen as a social norm. Males serve as available substitutes for unavailable women. The male who does the penetrating, meanwhile, is not emasculated any more than if he had sex with a wife. The male who is penetrated is emasculated. The boy, however, is not, since it is rationalized that he is not yet a man.

In this culture, males sexually penetrating males becomes a manifestation of male power, conferring a status of hyper-masculinity. It is considered to have nothing to do with homosexuality. An unmarried man who has sex with boys is simply doing what men do. As the scholar Bruce Dunne has demonstrated, sex in Islamic societies is not about mutuality between partners, but about the adult male's achievement of pleasure through violent domination.

There is silence around this issue. It is the silence that legitimizes sexual violence against women, such as honor crimes and female circumcision. It is also the silence that forces victimized Arab boys into invisibility. Even though the society does not see their sexual exploitation as being humiliating, the psychological and emotional scars that result from their subordination, powerlessness and humiliation is a given. Traumatized by the violation of their dignity and manliness, they spend the rest of their lives trying to get it back.

The problem is that trying to recover from sexual abuse, and to recapture one’s own shattered masculinity, is quite an ordeal in a culture where women are hated and love is interpreted as hegemonic control.

With women out of touch – and out of sight -- until marriage, males experience pre-marital sex only in the confines of being with other males. Their sexual outlet mostly includes victimizing younger males – just the way they were victimized.

In all of these circumstances, the idea of love is removed from men's understanding of sexuality. Like the essence of Arab masculinity, it is reduced to hurting others by violence. A gigantic rupture develops between men and women, where no harmony, affection or equality is allowed to exist. In relationships between men, meanwhile, affection, solidarity and empathy are left out of the picture. They threaten the hyper-masculine order.

It is excruciating to imagine the sexual confusion, humiliation, and repression that evolve in the mindsets of males in this culture. But it is no surprise that many of these males find their only avenue for gratification in the act of humiliating the foreign "enemy," whose masculinity must be violated at all costs – as theirs once was.

Violating the masculinity of the enemy necessitates the dishing out of severe violence against him. In the recent terrorist strikes, therefore, violence against Americans served as a much-needed release of the terrorists’ bottled-up sexual rage. Moreover, it served as a desperate and pathological testament of the re-masculinization of their emasculated selves.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last
Another Canadian view. Front Page Magazine looks like a good source, in general, with Horowitz, Coulter, and others.
1 posted on 10/04/2001 10:48:55 AM PDT by AZLiberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
I've heard that sexual abuse of children both male and female is RAMPANT in Muslim countries. The Koran allows girls as young as 6 to be married, if I remember correctly, and one aid worker in northern African told horror stories of little girls torn, bleeding, and dying of infection due to the attentions of her 30-40 year old "husband."

I've read other stories told by Muslim women of being raped by older brothers (and the brother's friends.) I remember a particular one in Saudi about a 12 year old girl gang-raped by her brother and his friends. Her resulting pregnancy was considered proof of her crime of fornication, and immediately after her baby was born she was stoned to death. The stoning took about 3 hours.

2 posted on 10/04/2001 10:57:25 AM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
Sexual repression exploding into displaced violence. A bit Freudian I would say. How about these people kill because they think killing will get them something?
3 posted on 10/04/2001 11:00:38 AM PDT by Lysander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
If the sick behavior described her is supposed to make me sympathetic to the destructive murderous acts of these terrorists, it isn't working.
4 posted on 10/04/2001 11:01:18 AM PDT by Magnum44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
But it is no surprise that many of these males find their only avenue for gratification in the act of humiliating the foreign "enemy," whose masculinity must be violated at all costs – as theirs once was.

And what better way to appear to violate our masculinity than to destroy our largest skyscrapers.

5 posted on 10/04/2001 11:02:50 AM PDT by SMASH IMPERIALIST LIBERALISM!!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: AZLiberty
Suddenly I am feeling very faint :(
7 posted on 10/04/2001 11:10:04 AM PDT by wndycndy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
Nobody is suggesting that mass murder is excusable. Why do you feel the need to defend yourself against pondering the disturbing ideas in this article?

You can dismiss it. Or, you could see it for what it is: An exposé of just what kind of enemy we face--i.e., a whole twisted, sick culture, not a handful of fanatics. The better we understand that Islamic culture produces huge numbers of near-psychotics, and that there are millions of these near-psychotics coming after us, not just a few thousand, the more prepared we will be.

There is such a thing as a knee-jerk conservative, and someone who dismisses all psychological insight as "psychobabble" or "excuse-making" is indulging in a knee-jerk reaction.

8 posted on 10/04/2001 11:14:04 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
Geez, what's next - the media and hollywood types will probably start sticking up for them since they were abused as children......
9 posted on 10/04/2001 11:14:40 AM PDT by Lorraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
If the sick behavior described her is supposed to make me sympathetic to the destructive murderous acts of these terrorists, it isn't working.

No, I think it is supposed to illustrate that the sociopathic behavior demonstrated by the terrorists isn't just religious zealotry, but also culturaly locked into much of the male population of this culture for the reasons outlined and we can expect more of it. As we know, sociopathic behavior and mindset is not prone to correction through punishment or mental health treatment, few choices are left to world society in dealing with this sort of viscousness.

It also is pointing up that fundamentalist Islam, actually breeds and fosters conditions ripe for such people to be programed for certain behavior.

10 posted on 10/04/2001 11:15:05 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lysander
You can dismiss the sexual-psychological angle if you want--If you want to be simplistic and reductionist about it.
11 posted on 10/04/2001 11:15:24 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
Not to mention the depredations inflicted on their GOAT population!
12 posted on 10/04/2001 11:16:00 AM PDT by LN2Campy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44
If the sick behavior described her is supposed to make me sympathetic to the destructive murderous acts of these terrorists, it isn't working.

Nah...don't think thats the intention at all. Just more evidence that Berlusconi is right. Western civilizion IS superior.

13 posted on 10/04/2001 11:17:16 AM PDT by iranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
Wow, if anyone read the "will" by Mohammed Atta(one of the hijackers) he sure sounded like he was violated like this based on some of his requests. One that sticks out in my mind the most is the request that the person who cleans his privates should wear gloves so he isn't touched there. Also he requested no women present at his funeral at all.

As for having pity for them, no this does not justify any terrorist acts, that's for sure. It does give indication though to how very badly this cult needs to be eradicated and that part of the world needs to be westernized. It gives us an indication of how far we will need to go to change that part of the world

glory

14 posted on 10/04/2001 11:18:18 AM PDT by glory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMASH IMPERIALIST LIBERALISM!!
Maybe this could have something to do with their fantasy of choice being 70 Virgins waiting for them in heaven??? That is a dominantion feast of a sexual fantasy, no? And what about the weird entries in Atta's will re: No pregnant women to visit his grave.

Jeez, and I thought American males had emotional constipation problems!

15 posted on 10/04/2001 11:20:07 AM PDT by wndycndy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SMASH IMPERIALIST LIBERALISM!!
Come to think of it I guess they were really huge phalic symbols......NOT!
16 posted on 10/04/2001 11:21:11 AM PDT by MooCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
Ann Coulter was right.
17 posted on 10/04/2001 11:23:21 AM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glory
OOps! Sorry Glory, looks like we were thinking along the same lines and posting at the same time ;)
18 posted on 10/04/2001 11:23:34 AM PDT by wndycndy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
I have a serious question. I knew some Muslims in college, but never really paid attention to Arab culture. Are the things discussed in this horrendous piece really true, even in more Westernized societies like Saudi Arabia or Egypt?

How could a society even function like that?

19 posted on 10/04/2001 11:23:48 AM PDT by The Right Stuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: The Right Stuff
Who says it functions?
20 posted on 10/04/2001 11:24:53 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson