Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mystery of terror 'insider dealers'
Independent Digital (UK) ^ | 2001-10-14 | Chris Blackhurst

Posted on 10/15/2001 7:15:31 AM PDT by Benoit Baldwin


Mystery of terror 'insider dealers'

By Chris Blackhurst

14 October 2001

Share speculators have failed to collect $2.5m (£1.7m) in profits made from the fall in the share price of United Airlines after the 11 September World Trade Centre attacks.

The fact that the money is unclaimed more than a month later has re-awakened investigators' interest in a story dismissed as coincidence.

It may be that investors who were able to predict the share price crash so skilfully are reluctant to be seen profiting from tragedy. But investigators now wonder whether there is a more sinister explanation.

The authorities are examining the possibility that if they knew what was coming, traders were intent on taking their profits immediately, before regulators had woken up to any possible scam. But investors failed to foresee that the first response of the US stock markets to the disaster was to suspend all trading for four days, thereby denying them the chance of cashing in their profits.

Further details of the futures trades that netted such huge gains in the wake of the hijackings have been disclosed. To the embarrassment of investigators, it has also emerged that the firm used to buy many of the "put" options – where a trader, in effect, bets on a share price fall – on United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by "Buzzy" Krongard, now executive director of the CIA.

Until 1997, Mr Krongard was chairman of Alex Brown Inc, America's oldest investment banking firm. Alex Brown was acquired by Bankers Trust, which in turn was bought by Deutsche Bank. His last post before resigning to take his senior role in the CIA was to head Bankers Trust – Alex Brown's private client business, dealing with the accounts and investments of wealthy customers around the world.

There is no suggestion that Mr Krongard had advance knowledge of the attacks.

Between 6 and 7 September, the Chicago Board Options Exchange saw purchases of 4,744 "put" option contracts in UAL versus 396 call options – where a speculator bets on a price rising. Holders of the put options would have netted a profit of $5m (£3.3m) once the carrier's share price dived after 11 September. On 10 September, more trading in Chicago saw the purchase of 4,516 put options in American Airlines, the other airline involved in the hijackings. This compares with a mere 748 call options in American purchased that day. Investigators cannot help but notice that no other airlines saw such trading in their put options.

It was not just airlines that were targeted by remarkably canny investors. One of the biggest occupants of the World Trade Centre was Morgan Stanley, the investment bank. In the first week of September, an average of 27 put option contracts was bought each day in its shares. The total for the three days before the attacks was 2,157. Merrill Lynch, anotherWTC tenant, saw 12,215 put options bought in the four days before the attacks, when the previous days had seen averages of 252 contracts a day.

© 2001 Independent Digital (UK) Ltd




TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Related Free Republic threads:
1 posted on 10/15/2001 7:15:31 AM PDT by Benoit Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Michael Rivero
I see you already picked up on this.
2 posted on 10/15/2001 7:20:33 AM PDT by Benoit Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benoit Baldwin
I thought Rivero had been permanently banned?
3 posted on 10/15/2001 7:24:46 AM PDT by motexva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Ignore the '(1)' in the list o' links. I thought, incorrectly, that I had found a duplicate article thread, and was going to post them both.
4 posted on 10/15/2001 7:31:16 AM PDT by Benoit Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5; aristeides; Black Jade; Boyd; Fred Mertz; freedomnews; Hamiltonian; independentmind...
ping
5 posted on 10/15/2001 7:51:22 AM PDT by Benoit Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benoit Baldwin
To the embarrassment of investigators, it has also emerged that the firm used to buy many of the "put" options – where a trader, in effect, bets on a share price fall – on United Airlines stock was headed until 1998 by "Buzzy" Krongard, now executive director of the CIA.

OMG...I'm speechless, actually. If this is true, it's sickening.

6 posted on 10/15/2001 8:09:05 AM PDT by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benoit Baldwin; *TerrOrWar
Even if it proves impossible to determine precisely who was speculating, it's still significant that someone was confident enough on Sept. 6 and 7 that the attacks would occur to bet money on it. That fact ought to be borne in mind in the investigation.

But I'm not at all convinced that it's impossible to determine the identity of the speculators. Any firm that handled these transactions had to know, if not the identity of the ultimate purchaser, at least the identity of the intermediary dealing with it. So you trace back, one intermediary, then the next, to the end. Anyone who refuses to give information, you ban from the market. If the law preserves secrecy, that law can be changed. In fact, the antiterrorism bill now going through Congress should contain such a provision, if it is needed. If the bill does not contain such a provision up to now, the provision can be added in the conference committee.

By the way, if the speculators never pick up their gains, who gets the money? Maybe that's another provision that should be added, giving that money to the families of the Sept. 11 victims.

7 posted on 10/15/2001 8:19:52 AM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benoit Baldwin
This must be thoroughly investigated, and not allowed to fade away.
A definite answer is needed.
8 posted on 10/15/2001 8:34:59 AM PDT by Memphis Schmuel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: motexva; Benoit Baldwin; texasbluebell; aristeides; Memphis Schmuel
-would be most interesting to see the evidence that the data presented here is false data. Seems like if it was, someone just opened themselves up for possible legal action. So if ya got it, let's see it. If it's true, well........... Thanks in advance.
9 posted on 10/15/2001 8:51:44 AM PDT by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I WANT TO BELIEVE (poster from 'The X-Files')

10 posted on 10/15/2001 10:00:34 AM PDT by Benoit Baldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Benoit Baldwin
thanks for the info
11 posted on 10/15/2001 8:00:53 PM PDT by freedomnews
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson