Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rumsfeld: Combating Those Who Place Careers Before Country
CNSNews.com ^ | October 24, 2001 | Paul M. Weyrich

Posted on 10/24/2001 5:56:37 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

I have known Don Rumsfeld for over thirty years. As a congressman, he represented the northern suburbs of Chicago. He left the House when Richard Nixon offered him the chance to run the Office of Economic Opportunity. Later when Gerald R. Ford became President, he named Rumsfeld to be his chief of staff and later appointed him to be his Secretary of Defense. When Ford left office, Rumsfeld threw himself into the private sector with exceptional enthusiasm. He even mounted a barely remembered campaign for president because, as he told me, it was a fun thing to do. He became Secretary of Defense again for George W. Bush as a compromise candidate.

During all this time he was the kind of person who was constantly cheerful. He always had a twinkle in his eye. Just before September 11th, when he was being sliced and diced by the US political and journalistic community as he attempted to transform the country's national defense, he never lost his perspective and sense of humor.

That outlook on life also shaped his outlook on politics. He didn't disagree with the conservative movement so much on philosophical grounds. For Rumsfeld, many of us were too negative. Life was supposed to be enjoyed. Nothing could be all THAT serious. That is why when I see Secretary Rumsfeld looking angry at various press conferences, and I hear even Fox News Network anchormen complaining that Rumsfeld is "cranky," then I know something is really seriously wrong.

From Rumsfeld's perspective, he simply cannot understand how Pentagon operatives can leak critical information to the news media when our Special Forces are conducting field operations in Afghanistan. He has said he is too busy right now to track down who did it but he made it clear that whoever leaked the information had committed a criminal act.

"Whoever is doing this is putting the lives of men and women in our forces on the ground at risk," Rumsfeld said over and over again. He seemed to grow more upset every time he mentioned the issue.

Another matter troubling Rumsfeld is that some in the media appear intent on compromising the safety of our armed forces by the kind of questions they ask. The Secretary has made it clear that he simply will not reply to those kinds of questions. It may not have been that important to Rumsfeld while it was happening, but the culture has changed in the time between his past and present service as Defense Secretary.

The attitude of many reporters and many staffers in the bureaucracy is simply this: They don't care about what is important to the defense of the country. What they do care about is what advances their agenda. A Pentagon staffer thinks that by leaking secret information it will cause him to accumulate some brownie points with influential members of the media. And those in the media are always looking for headlines and ratings. Competition is fierce. Whatever gets these reporters on the front page or causes the TV reporters to get a talent fee for making a prime time news hour matters most. To Hell with whether their story compromises our armed forces or the salvation of the nation.

Well, I'm for Rumsfeld. He is absolutely entitled to his outrage. I hope he continues to explain why he is upset to the American people. They need to know that there are people in the government and in the media who would sell out America. Who better to tell it like it is than Rumsfeld who is proving to be an extraordinary Defense Secretary; born, it would seem, for this moment.
Free Congress Foundation


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2001 5:56:37 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: hogwaller
Well geeze, Rumsfeld has hardly been in charge, and he didn't have ANY influence over the last 8 years, which REALLY screwed the pooch on this country. I think he's doing a pretty good job, given the tough situation he's been handed.

The actions of the media have been atrocious. This is just like that SNL skit from the Gulf War, where reporters are asking Gen. Schwartzkof (sp) questions like "What information can you tell us would be most damaging to US morale?" and "Where could Saddams Scud missles be fired to cause the most damage." And then the guy from the Bagdad Times asks "When is the ground invasion going to begin?"

Why does the media ask questions they KNOW shouldn't be asked?!
3 posted on 10/24/2001 6:24:04 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WyldKard
Wyldkard I got to agree with you 100% of your post. The part about the media also. I we had had the same media approach in WWII half of us would be speaking German and the other half in work camps in Japan. I can hear the media now: Is it true that we've been training B-25 pilots to lauch off a carrier deck? Would this mean were are going to bomb a major city in Japan? Is general Doolittle currently enroute to Pearl Harbor? BTW I was all wrong about you.
4 posted on 10/24/2001 6:38:07 AM PDT by KSCITYBOY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
hey hog',

you sound just like a Democratic Underground poseur. Maybe you can find more sympathetic ears over on the DU site.

you sure your where you want to be?

Regards, Lurking'

5 posted on 10/24/2001 6:38:29 AM PDT by LurkingSince'98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
Just heard that wild pigs are a protected specie in Germany, head on back home!
6 posted on 10/24/2001 6:41:51 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
The media will do what the media always does, spill the beans.

This particular issue that Weyrich sites is a Defense Department issue. Rumsfield needs to make time to root out the leakers and kick thier butts!

7 posted on 10/24/2001 7:19:47 AM PDT by Topaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: hogwaller
So we hire a security company. Lets call it American Defense Company (ADC). They tell us they'll protect us and we give them a nice office, lots of computers and phones and lots of money and an army to use to protect our interests.

They have the job for eight months. This thief and murderer hits us anyway, and does a lot of damage and kills employees. ADC comes back and says "Well, we weren't ready. Here's another plan. Maybe this one'll work."

Okay, let me take your analogy, spin it around, and give it back to you.

For the last eight years, The United Executive Corporation, parent company of ADC, had a real moron as Chairman of the Board....heck, lets say the entire Board of Chairmen were idiots. This CEO totally guts ADC's funding, cripples their ability to get their job done, accepts bribes and graft, and essentially commits actions that make it easier and more desirable for thieves to break in to ABC.

The shareholders vote, and after a messy proxy battle, a new Board of Chairmen is installed. The first thing the CEO fo ADC corporation says "Wow..this is mess, but we'll do our best with what we have." Eight months later, thieves and murderers hit. Who do we assign the most blame to? The new CEO that was hamstrung by the last Chairmans incompotence, or the incompetant ex-Chairman who created the situation in the first place?

You seem very quick to blame Rumsfield for this, and aren't even TOUCHING any of the things that Clinton really did to us.

One way or the other, 9/11 was coming. People got stupid and complacent. Our military was being gutted. Give Rumsfield a CHANCE first, befoer calling for his head on a pike. I'd like to wait until the Sky Marshall botches up the Klendathu invasion before we toss him out (Bonus points to the first geek who gets the reference :)

I'm VERY surprised you are blaming mostly Rumsfield for this, and aren't saying a thing about the CIA, either.
9 posted on 10/24/2001 10:01:19 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: hogwaller
LOL
14 posted on 10/24/2001 4:42:16 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
LOL, you had me fooled there for a minute. I was about to hit you with a real FLAME, but then I realized that nobody could be that stupid, so you just have to be pulling our leg.

ROTFLMCO, good job, you really came across as an ignorant dolt.

15 posted on 10/24/2001 4:52:26 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
So we blame CEOs and chairmen all the way back to George Washington?

According to your logic, since Rumsfeld was Defense Secretary 25 years ago and returned to the position in January it's all his fault. Nonsense.
Plenty of blame to go around but your quick dismissal of Bush and those around him in the face of a good performance since September 11th smacks of a bias that transcends mere concern over staff quality.
Your aversion to recognizing Clinton's eight-year attack and dismemberment of the CIA, FBI and Defense Department along with the weakening of our military is strange, but yet you leap to condemn people in office for barely eight months for the September 11th attack. Some responsibilty is due to the Bush team, yes, but not to the extent you place on them.

16 posted on 10/24/2001 4:55:01 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
You said it, buddy. The fact that none of these careerists have even offered to resign says volumes about what they're made of. I have about three cents' worth of confidence in the whole dogpile of them. The latest addition, Ridge, is as bad as the worst of the cabinet before he came aboard, which is CT Whitman.
17 posted on 10/24/2001 4:57:50 PM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: hogwaller
You are blaming the DOD for something they were not responsible for before 11 Sept 2001.

Your whole analysis is 1000% wrong because you don't know who is actually responsible for what went wrong on 11 Sept.

19 posted on 10/24/2001 5:01:37 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hogwaller
Rumsfeld is a man of the world and no fool. So, 9/11 was either incompetence or apathy or a complete failure of intelligence. It would seem a lot of the world, except the American public, knew how bad the first attack might be.

Rumsfeld inherited a Pentagon that suffered through at least eight years of serious mismanagement. Are you aware of the systems fiaso alone which has left millions and millions of dollars worth of equipment unaccounted for? If you are looking for people to blame, I would start with the FBI and CIA.

20 posted on 10/24/2001 5:08:39 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson