Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Toxic Nightmare At Disaster Site/Air, water, soil contaminated
New York Daily News ^ | 10/26/01 | Juan Gonzalez

Posted on 10/26/2001 2:23:13 AM PDT by kattracks

Toxic chemicals and metals are being released into the environment around lower Manhattan by the collapse of the World Trade Center towers and by the fires still burning at Ground Zero, according to internal government reports obtained by the Daily News.

Dioxins, PCBs, benzene, lead and chromium are among the toxic substances detected in the air and soil around the WTC site by Environmental Protection Agency equipment — sometimes at levels far exceeding federal levels, the documents show.

wtc_aerial.jpg (9129 bytes)
The WTC site continues to release harmful contaminants.

EPA monitoring devices also have found considerable contaminants in the Hudson River — in the water and in the sediment — especially after it rains.

Six weeks after the WTC attack, benzene — a colorless liquid that evaporates quickly and can cause leukemia, bone marrow damage and other diseases in long-term exposure — continues to be released into the air in plumes from the still-burning fires at relatively high levels.

The federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration's permissible exposure limits for workers handling benzene over an eight-hour day is 1 part per million.

But the EPA documents reveal that the standard has been exceeded by considerable margins.

On Oct. 2, for example, benzene levels from three spots around Ground Zero were measured at 42, 31 and 16 times higher than the OSHA standard. On Oct. 12, one reading measured 21 times higher.

The highest benzene level was recorded Oct. 11 — 58 times higher than OSHA's permissible exposure limit.

The documents obtained by The News detail the presence of many hazardous substances — many of them odorless — in levels above or approaching EPA or OSHA safety standards.

"Yes, they are high," said EPA spokeswoman Mary Mears, when asked to comment on the hazardous-substance readings contained in her agency's documents. "But you get a little distance from the plume and they go dramatically down."

When questioned, though, Mears conceded that shifting winds sometimes blow the plume directly at workers at the site.

Because emissions of substances like benzene have exceeded OSHA levels, the EPA has urged rescue and cleanup workers to use respirators.

Compounding the Effects

The effects of exposure to any hazardous substance depend on dose, duration, how the person is exposed, personal traits and habits, and whether other chemicals are present, according to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, a branch of the Department of Health and Human Services.

wtc_toxic2.jpg (9533 bytes)
Hazardous substances are at levels well above EPA standards.

In many instances, government scientists believe, short-term exposure is not a real concern, though other experts believe small amounts of certain carcinogenic substances eventually can cause serious disease.

The EPA documents, which include hundreds of pages of daily monitoring reports, were obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Environmental Law and Justice Project and made available to The News.

Until now, public attention has focused largely on the potential hazards of asbestos in the air.

But the EPA records reveal that the release of toxic chemicals from the collapse of the twin towers and the subsequent subterranean fires has been far more extensive than first believed.

Among the findings contained in the EPA documents:

"What I've seen of the data is troubling," said Paul Bartlett, an expert on PCBs and dioxins at the Queens College Center for the Biology of Natural Systems. He added that in his opinion, whatever monitoring the EPA has conducted has been inadequate.

"Their detection limits are aimed at threshold levels for occupational exposure," Bartlett said. "They aren't treating this as a disaster, so they're not asking what extent and how far are people being exposed or who is possibly being affected by the releases of chemicals. They're just checking what emissions are exceeding regulations."

"I'm most concerned about the soup effect of all these toxic chemicals," said Monona Rossol, an industrial hygienist who works with the Environmental Law and Justice Project. "No one's worrying about the combination of these things on the workers."

"When we are finding these readings that have some significant level to them, they are primarily within the work area," said EPA spokeswoman Mary Helen Cervantes. "As for the cumulative impact of these chemicals, that is an area of science and study and research that we really have not developed methodologies to do that kind of assessment."

"I don't know how the government defines a Superfund site," Bartlett said. "But I'd certainly treat Ground Zero like one."

Toxic Definitions

SOURCE: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry




TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2001 2:23:13 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Does this mean the Greens will finally become offended at terrorism? </sarcasm>
2 posted on 10/26/2001 2:30:28 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Does this mean the Greens will finally become offended at terrorism? "

No, the problem is due to those evil capitalist and the materials they used in building the WTC.

3 posted on 10/26/2001 2:55:50 AM PDT by Kerberos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
One word "plastic."
4 posted on 10/26/2001 3:00:02 AM PDT by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kerberos
Of course... silly me.
5 posted on 10/26/2001 3:00:49 AM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wu wu. Now we'll find out who, what, when, where the terrorists are, fer shure, what with the EPA on their tail.
6 posted on 10/26/2001 3:04:08 AM PDT by WhiteyAppleseed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
It continues to baffle me how the rubble in NYC continues to burn 6 weeks after the attack.
7 posted on 10/26/2001 3:12:23 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteyAppleseed
The amazing thing is, that if you violated an OSHA PEL so blatantly a few months ago, the Feds would be all over you. Now, it's no big deal. It's probably not harmful, etc.

See, now it's the Fed's money and the Fed's job. So we're going to toss all that safety BS out the window.

So you either have to believe that the Government is callously violating the health and safety of the workers or that the OSHA PEL's were BS codified.

8 posted on 10/26/2001 3:33:30 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
The Fires Still Burn

Lest we forget.

:

10 posted on 10/26/2001 3:42:06 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Right! we must never forget why we are fighting this war. The Arabs are rejoicing in these things. It is an honorable fight and we need to do a GOOD job. That means don't worry about Arab nations reaction to our war. This is our war. Israel will side with us thru great understanding.
11 posted on 10/26/2001 4:02:07 AM PDT by Jackie222
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
And we worry about making a little fallout drift around Iraq, Afganistan, Syria, or Iran.
12 posted on 10/26/2001 5:12:19 AM PDT by Bill Rice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"It continues to baffle me how the rubble in NYC continues to burn 6 weeks after the attack."

I cannot imagine one of my loved ones still being in that rubble. I'm afraid they would have to kill me to stop me from seeking revenge.

13 posted on 10/26/2001 5:17:21 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
The amazing thing is, that if you violated an OSHA PEL so blatantly a few months ago, the Feds would be all over you.

It's pretty much SOP. In '84, I cleaned up a weapons lab that was flooded. We were down in the basement without any HAZMAT equipment. We rounded a corner and come face to face with space suits and all sorts of testing equipment. Their supervisor told us to evac because they were tracing a cyanide gas release.

During the entire op, the HAZMAT team was running around with alarms going off on their monitors, yet none of the workers were ever given any more than a hospital dust mask. . .

14 posted on 10/26/2001 5:55:29 AM PDT by antidisestablishment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Ha ha ha.

It just means that the EPA might finally have something real to do.
Not just "keep busy" work for the lowest fifth percentile of the bell curve in the employ of the government.

15 posted on 10/26/2001 5:59:45 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: googolplex
Hang in there, you "progressive" maroon.
Eventually you will develop adult judgement.
16 posted on 10/26/2001 6:01:46 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blam
I'm afraid they would have to kill me to stop me from seeking revenge.

And I am sure that the losers will do just that to prove how understanding, compassionate, PC and multicultural they are.

17 posted on 10/26/2001 6:03:39 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I expect the EPA to issue thousands of citations to the dead and the survivors for violating the habitat of the big-butt red-legged New York Rat.

That has always been their style.

18 posted on 10/26/2001 6:06:44 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
The amazing thing is, that if you violated an OSHA PEL so blatantly a few months ago, the Feds would be all over you. Now, it's no big deal. It's probably not harmful, etc.

But don't even consider being near the park where someone is smoking a CIGARETTE! You could drop stone cold dead

19 posted on 10/26/2001 6:13:59 AM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
EPA spokeswoman Mary Helen Cervantes: "As for the cumulative impact of these chemicals, that is an area of science and study and research that we really have not developed methodologies to do that kind of assessment."

This statement makes me wonder how the EPA goes about screening candidates for public relations positions. Gobbledigook. She does make it clear, however, that the EPA has little interest in really understanding the health impact of these chemical soups, which raises the question of why in the devil we fund EPA at all.

20 posted on 10/26/2001 7:13:56 AM PDT by Think free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson