Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRAN TO OFFER COVERT BACKING TO TALEBAN AND AL QA’EDA, SOURCES CLAIM
World Net Daily ^ | 11.03.01 | Iran Press Service

Posted on 11/04/2001 7:33:04 AM PST by callisto

TEHRAN 3 Nov. (IPS) Iran has decided to help both the afghan ruling Taleban regime against the United States and the "Al-Qa’eda" organisation to mount new terrorist operations aimed at the US and British forces stationed in the Persian Gulf, informed sources with access to the Revolutionary Guards intelligence said Friday.

According to the source, Iran has sent to Afghanistan some 1.500 men, "fully equipped", drawn from the Revolutionary guards elite "Al-Qods" force to Afghanistan, mixed with Afghans militias belonging to Mr. Golboddin Hekmatyar, an unpopular Afghan warlord who lives in Iran.

Mr. Hekmatyar, a former CIA collaborator, is remembered as the man who fought bitterly with Ahmad Shah Mas’ood after the defeat of the Red Army in Afghanistan, pounding Kabol for several weeks, paving the way for the Pakistan, Saudi and US backed Taleban’s almost bloodless take-over of the ruined capital in 1996.

Since the start of the US-led military operations in Afghanistan aimed at "Al Qa’eda" organisation and its Taleban protectors, Mr. Hekmatyar has entered talks with the Taleban, offering them the support of his men, estimated at some 5.000, to fight the Americans.

"Al-Qa’eda" is Mr. Osama Ben Laden’s main military organisation suspected by the Americans to be behind the deadly 11 September suicide operations in New York and in Washington D.C.

"The Iranians are disguised as Afghan refugees who like thousands of their fellow citizen in Pakistan, want to go back fighting the Americans, but in fact they are well-trained and equipped members of the famous "Al-Qods" (Jerusalem) units", the source further added.

Some 1,200 Pakistanis, armed with old guns, swords or knives, have entered Afghanistan to fight alongside the Taleban, and thousands more are waiting along the border to follow them, the English-language "The News" newspaper of Pakistan reported, adding that the men, most of them ols, ''were taken to the Pak-Afghan border in about 100 pickups".

"At the same time, Iran would provide a thoroughfare for "Al-Qa’eda" to reach the Persian Gulf, where the US has a large armada, via the Iranian province of Sistan and Baloochistan on the borders of both Afghanista and Pakistan", the source said, adding that "warm waters’" seems to be the code name for possible operations.

Dedicated originally to protect the oil-rich Arab sheikhdoms against menaces from Iran or Iraq, and seen by both nations as a threat to their security, the US stationed a large naval force in the region after the defeat of Iraq in the 1990 war.

None of the claims could be verified, but anti-terrorist and military experts contacted by Iran Press Service said they "look possible and sound probable".

"There are some stubborn hard-liners, including the staunchly anti-American leader himself, but also the Defence Minister and the Commander of the Islamic Revolution forces, that serves as the mollahrchy’s praetorian guard, who would like to engage the US in military term", observed one expert.

"It seems that some foreign analysts have convinced the ruling conservatives in Iran to lay a trap to American forces by enlarging the battle field to Iran and Iraq in order to deal Washington a humiliating military defeat", another analyst speculated.

It is an open secret that the Islamic Republic had regular contacts with Mr. Ben Laden and his organisation until 1996, the year the Taleban entered Kabol and created the Islamic Emarat of Afghanistan, led by their "Supreme Leader", Mollah Mohammad Omar, who self-appointed himself as the "Amir al Mo’menin", or the Commander of the Believers, a title coveted by the egocentric and megalomaniac Khameneh’i.

But other analysts doubted the veracity of the information, observing that not only Iran never recognised the Afghanistan Islamic Emirate, the official name of what is called commonly as Taleban, but stop short of declaring war on Kabol in 1988 after the capture of northern city of Mazar Sharif, the capital of the anti-Taleban Northern Alliance and the cold blood assassination of eight Iranian diplomats and one journalist of the official news agency IRNA inside the consulate by Taleban soldiers.

Both decisions of sending troops and permitting "Al-Qa'eda" Arab fighters to reach the strategic water way were taken by the recently created "Committee of Five", formed by Ayatollah Mahmood Hashemi-Shahroodi, the Iraqi-born Head of the Judiciary to draw guidelines and formulate policies concerning the conduct of affairs in neighbouring Afghanistan, the source claimed.

Members of the Committee are, besides Mr. Hashemi-Shahroodi, Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, the Secretary of the powerful Council of Guardians, Ayatollah Mohammad Yazdi, a member of this body, Dr. Ali Akbar Velayati, Iran’s former Foreign Minister, Mr. Ardeshir Larijani, an adviser on international affairs to the leader and Mr. Ala’eddin Boroojerdi, Mr. Khameneh’is special representative and envoy for Afghan questions.

Mr. Hashemi-Shahroodi, who still keeps his title as the spokesman and secretary of the Tehran-based Supreme Assembly of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SAIRI) urged judges to take "legal actions" against anyone who would dare to speak publicly of holding talks with the "Great Satan".

The expression was coined by Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, th leader of the Islamic revolution, to designate the United States. But it had been largely banned from the political vocabulary in the past years.

"Our national interests lie with antagonising the Great Satan. We condemn any cowardly stance toward America and any word on compromise with the Great Satan'', Mr. Hashemi Shahroudi said, using a term favored by hard-liners to describe the United States. "Our foreign policy, constitution, religion and people reject any compromise with oppressor America. Those who speak of relations with America are not speaking for this Muslim nation'', added, quoted by the independent Iran's student news agency ISNA.

He also instructed the International Affairs Department at the Judiciary to form a committee to probe U.S. claims as well as allegations of human rights violations, saying that the U.S. measures "not only lack judicial logic but are also against their national interests".

"No legal and human logic accepts military deployment by a nation on the pretext of arresting several terrorist'' said Hashemi-Shahroudi, calling on jurors, judges, attorneys, and world's civil and independent institutions to inform the world on the legal aspect of the danger of U.S.' anti-human actions.

"The Americans want to involve Iran in the Afghan conflict and make it a partner in the massacre of innocent people. They also want to show to the world that the Islamic Republic has backtracked on its revolutionary ideals", Mr. Khameneh’I said Wednesday during a speech pronounced in the central city of Esfahan.

"Those who speak of ties have no ill will; they are just misinformed. They don't understand that negotiations will make the Americans ever more demanding", he added, in answer to some officials, particularly reformists MMs (Members of the Majles) urging the government of President Mohammad Khatami to adopt a conciliatory attitude towards the United States.

The leader’s outright rejection of any dialogue with Washington and his hard hitting attacks on the American military operations in Afghanistan were reverbrated throughout the country by Friday preachers, all appointed by him, during their Friday sermons.

Mohammad Arasi, an Iranian expert of the Caucasus says the provocative attitude undertaken by Mr. Khameneh’I against the United States in fact serves the aims of some enemies of Iran, namely Russia, Turkey, Pakistan and Israel, "all of them afraid of any improvement in Tehran-Washington relations".


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2001 7:33:04 AM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: callisto
Time to nuke Tehran.

--Boris

2 posted on 11/04/2001 7:34:12 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto; RobFromGa
I wonder how this will sit with these people?

A New Iranian Revolution?

3 posted on 11/04/2001 7:37:09 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
This would be a complete turn around for the Iranian government. They have opposed the Taleban since it's formation. A couple of years ago the Taleban murdered 11 Iranian diplomats sent to talk with them about refugees.
4 posted on 11/04/2001 7:37:24 AM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
The Iranians just can't wait for their turn.

5.56mm

5 posted on 11/04/2001 7:39:01 AM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
I disagree. Time to assassinate Khamenei.
The public supports the US and wants to bring back the Shah.
6 posted on 11/04/2001 7:39:16 AM PST by ScholarWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Simon de Montfortr once is reputed to have said: "Kill them all. God will know his own."
7 posted on 11/04/2001 7:39:53 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Iran has decided to help both the afghan ruling Taleban regime against the United States and the "Al-Qa’eda" organisation to mount new terrorist operations aimed at the US and British forces stationed in the Persian Gulf, informed sources with access to the Revolutionary Guards intelligence said Friday.

Iran will have a nuclear device by the year 2004. If we do not destroy the entirity of that country before then, we deserve the explosion that will certainly occur in our shores.

8 posted on 11/04/2001 7:40:36 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Oh really? Oh BLOODY REALLY?!? Who the bloody hell do they think they are playing about with? Iraq?

Destablise the bastards, push the revolution, kill the mullahs.

Regards, Ivan

FreeBritannia.co.uk
9 posted on 11/04/2001 7:40:46 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
This would be a complete turn around for the Iranian government. They have opposed the Taleban since it's formation.

We're worse, I guess.

10 posted on 11/04/2001 7:41:16 AM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: callisto
So they make peace overtures to the US, and covertly help terrorists? Sounds like typical Islamic lying to me. Lie to everyone, and stab them in the back the first chance you get. Sit Norm.
11 posted on 11/04/2001 7:43:11 AM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Lazamataz
Iran is the breeding ground for terRorism. They are what Nazism was to Germany. Now the question- will we go into that country? My answer is no. Therefor we won't end terrorism. We will again repeat history as we did after WWII. Remember this war is just as much about OIL.
13 posted on 11/04/2001 7:49:03 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Digger
The more time goes on, the more I do think this is indeed a relgious war: look at the LYING by Iran, the LYING by Pakistani elements, the POLITICAL POLLS showing Muslims in Britain support bin Laden. It truly is the Muslims...seeking to wipe out men, women and children who aren't of the same religion, against Christian, Jews, and anyone else who doesn't believe in their religion. I didn't feel this way until recently. AND I agree-- if we don't do something about Iran we may "win" this war and within a year or two face a nuke-powered Iran that's formenting terrorism all over again.
14 posted on 11/04/2001 7:52:16 AM PST by jraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: callisto; harpseal; Travis McGee; Victoria Delsoul; Spirit Of Truth; Manny Festo...
Mr. Hashemi-Shahroodi, who still keeps his title as the spokesman and secretary of the Tehran-based Supreme Assembly of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq (SAIRI) urged judges to take "legal actions" against anyone who would dare to speak publicly of holding talks with the "Great Satan".

The expression was coined by Grand Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, th leader of the Islamic revolution, to designate the United States. But it had been largely banned from the political vocabulary in the past years.

"Our national interests lie with antagonising the Great Satan. We condemn any cowardly stance toward America and any word on compromise with the Great Satan'', Mr. Hashemi Shahroudi said, using a term favored by hard-liners to describe the United States. "Our foreign policy, constitution, religion and people reject any compromise with oppressor America. Those who speak of relations with America are not speaking for this Muslim nation'', added, quoted by the independent Iran's student news agency ISNA.

This sounds odd to me. Iran has never been friendly to the Taliban. They recently entered a tacit agreement with us allowing for some unofficial "emergency" use of their airspace.

They know we're going after Saddam Hussein, who is responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iranians, including civilians, during the Iran-Iraq War in the 1980s. They can't like the idea of the Butcher of Baghdad rolling out his tanks through the region backed up with weapons of mass destruction.

So how does this news, if true, make any sense?

Methinks this about-face has to do with the rioting in Teheran right now, and the hardliners are hoping to divert domestic attention to the "Great Satan," in order to defuse the domestic turmoil there which is threatening to end the reign of the radical mullahs.

Watch for a massive crackdown on secular Iranian demonstrators of trumped-up charges of "collaboratiing" with America.


15 posted on 11/04/2001 7:56:37 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Islam should be encouraged to put all of its bad eggs into the Afghanistani basket. Fifteen hundred troops is a cowardly offering. Why not 150 thousand? Syria, Iraq, and maybe even the worthless Saudis have impassioned Muslim fighters to send to war. Load them up, and send them now. It would be good for the free world and for the existing tyrants in the Satanic States of Islam if we could just drop a few nukes and vaporize a large pile of scum, all in one worthless place.
16 posted on 11/04/2001 7:58:11 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: nomasmojarras
I thought Iran was against the Taliban

IMO Iran is acting like Pakistan by expressing conflicting behaviors for socio-political reasons endemic in their country.

18 posted on 11/04/2001 8:19:10 AM PST by callisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Source: World Net Daily
19 posted on 11/04/2001 8:22:20 AM PST by carpio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nomasmojarras
this is a simple process, you will see more countries doing this, china did it already, pakistan is following, now iran looks like we are allowing all of these bast*rds into one place. iran pulled a group out of lebanon wonder if this is the same group, send the plfp islamic jihad, and the rest over there to be carpet bombed.
20 posted on 11/04/2001 8:28:48 AM PST by veryconernedamerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson