Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China in the lurch
WORLD TRIBUNE ^ | November 5, 2001 | Sol Sanders

Posted on 11/05/2001 8:48:16 AM PST by a_Turk

Communist China’s game plan has been hit hard by the cascading events since 9/11. Beijing had no choice but to join the world chorus of support for the U.S. with the atroicities occurring on the eve of its hosting the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation session. Chinese leadership puts great stock in welcoming of the long-nosed barbarians to kowtow. And Pres. Bush, in early days of putting together a war coalition — certainly the most peculiar since Winston Churchill’s Britain joined Josef Stalin’s forces to defeat Hitler Germany — hadn’t much choice. He had to enthusiastically welcome the Chinese aboard.

But, in fact, the Chinese have been backing off ever since. They have sent out a bevy of officials to Third World and other countries to sabotage U.S. goals. Li Peng, the butcher of Tien An Mien, told the Algerians Beijing objects to tying the issue to one country, Afghanistan. Vice President Hu Jintao, making his maiden pilgrimage to be photographed with every European ikon to shake his parochial reputation, coaxed the French — it never takes much — into a joint anti-American statement. A new massive campaign by official media presents 9/11 as the deserved humbling of the arrogant superpower.

None of this, however, masks bad news for Beijing, arising out of 9/11. The economic downturn is playing havoc with Chinese exports, its economy already in deep trouble. The skid of Shanghai markets, triggered by Beijing’s attempts to unload dinosaur state-owned companies, is another reflection. Prime Minister Zhu Rongji had to give at least a temporary respite, even though rationalizing the state companies is the essence of economic reform. No one wants to talk about the banks that have been keeping these defunct enterprises afloat.

Strategically, too, Beijing is being hammered. Although Prime Minister Koizumi went to China to explain himself, and will do so again this week at ASEAN, Japan’s sending noncombatant Self-Defense Forces in support of the U.S. is more than unwelcome for Beijing. That coupled with new rules of engagement for Japanese forces appears to be achieving Koizumi’s goal of eliminating the “no war” clause from the constitution, if simply by more legal contortions.

Beijing has used the world outcry against terrorism as a pretext to hammer Uighur nationalists in Sinkiang. But closing the Karakoram Highway to Pakistan and the public announcement of reinforcements on the borders with Central Asia is concern over the possibility a collapsing Taleban might send sparks their way. Even before the American events, Vice President Hu had unprecedented security when he visited Tibet on the 50th anniversary of the Chinese takeover. Articles in Chinese learned journals worry about the whole strategy of westward development that was supposed to solve China’s economic problems. One concern: China’s depleting oil. Exploiting Sinkiang’s oil and pipelines [with American capital and technology] from Central Asia to China proper are now much more difficult.

The Chinese make no bones about their unhappiness at having U.S. military operating off bases in former Soviet Central Asia. Like the former, blabbering Pakistan ISI Director Gull who helped create the Taleban Frankenstein, ever paranoid, Beijing sees it is as an American pretext to surround China. The Chinese know, of course, Russian Pres. Putin was all but ignored, finally, when Washington went directly to the Uzbeks and Tajiks for use of former Soviet bases, without the Kremlin’s by your leave. China’s effort, with the Russians, to set up a Central Asian alliance against the Moslem fundamentalists and to keep the Americans out, is falling apart. The Uzbeks didn’t bother to attend the last meeting. And now the perplexing question of letting Pakistan in may be moot what with Gen. Musharruf’s having thrown in his lot with the Americans. It won’t end the Beijing-Pak alliance [against India with its dependence on China nuclear and missile transfers] but it will be a quite different Pakistan from the one moving toward pariah status with Washington, the case before 9/11.

Hidden is the bitter intra-party succession struggle. Asked about it at a press conference, Jiang went tongue-tied and made a scene. His anointed for 10 years, Hu, was promoted to the omnipotent Party Military Committee at the recent Communist Party shindig. But Jiang was rebuffed when he asked publicly for China’s businessmen to be admitted to Party membership — and probably leadership. Hu is supposed to take over from Jiang as Party leader a year from now. But Zeng Qinghong who controls the Party’s administrative apparatus is hovering. And given that Communist China has never had an orderly transfer of power, and that Jiang hopes to hang around like his mentor, Deng Hsiaoping, until he drops, as chairman of the all-important Military Committee, Communist backroom fun and games are the order of the day.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Sol W. Sanders, (solsanders@abac.com), is an Asian specialist with more than 25 years in the region, and a former correspondent for Business Week, U.S. News & World Report and United Press International. He writes weekly for World Tribune.com.
1 posted on 11/05/2001 8:48:16 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
In 9-11 look carefully for the stealthy finger of Red China , and then look to Indonesia as the new seat of power for Muslim terrorists. Saudi Arabia and Syria and Iran and Iraq will be well-served by us in proper order and in accordance with their misdeeds.
2 posted on 11/05/2001 8:55:00 AM PST by chemainus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
It's like dealing with a schizophrenic. China is playing both sides against the middle. Crazed despot.
3 posted on 11/05/2001 9:00:49 AM PST by WriteOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Cok ilginc, efendim! You might be interested in a recently published book by a Chinese-American, Gordon Chang, who is a long-time resident of China: "The Coming Collapse of China." Provocative title, but an intriguing thesis.
4 posted on 11/05/2001 9:18:29 AM PST by Map Kernow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Map Kernow
Before Sept 11th I thought our biggest enemy in the world was China. Now the biggest is the Islamic world. Sooner or later, the entire Middle East will take on the Western World, hopefully with Russia and India as partners. But I can't forget the "terrorist" act of the Chinese in April, when they forced down our plane, which was clearly in international waters. We should keep our immediate focus on the terrorists, but keep the Chinese in the corner of our eye. No telling what they are doing now, under the cover of this crisis. Plus, I heard today that their state media published a story, saying that the US "deserved" what had happened and that they would never again be afraid of Americans, seeing photos of us "running through the streets in terror," as if this were not normal behavior by any human in an emergency. Hopefully, the above post is true, that they will turn into a democracy at some point. If not, the world is in for a bloody 21th century: first the Islamic world, then the communist one.....
5 posted on 11/05/2001 9:28:25 AM PST by Malcolm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

I have lived in Hong Kong and worked extensively in China for the past 2 years. Indeed, they need to be watched very closely. The great masses of people are simply trying to get rich. But the leaders have a long-bred sense of paranoia: Fear of invasion (remembering Japan), fear of insult (remembering the Opium War), fear of losing internal control (remembering the dynastic upheavals). This paranoia has made them see enemies on all sides and want to prove that they are a real power -- their desperation to win the Olympics was almost comical. But the combination of paranoia and sensitivity to insult makes them dangerous -having the option to contain them is important. China is no friend to the West.
6 posted on 11/05/2001 9:45:15 AM PST by adambc123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: boston_liberty; Landru; goldilucky; KLT
Good post boston.
(China is our enemy...and let's not forget it.
8 posted on 11/05/2001 10:42:59 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: boston_liberty
For the sake of the sheeple's that don't know the media that choose to refer to China as Communist or Red China should also refer to the United States as Capitalist.
You're right, but I'm thinking it may be possible that they're trying to draw a distinction between mainland and Taiwan..
9 posted on 11/05/2001 11:32:57 AM PST by a_Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: rightwing2; Askel5; flamefront; GeronL; Aaron_A
The Chinese know, of course, Russian Pres. Putin was all but ignored, finally, when Washington went directly to the Uzbeks and Tajiks for use of former Soviet bases, without the Kremlin’s by your leave.

Anyone know about these slights to Putin and the Russian State? Everyone keeps saying Russia is our ally and good buddy in Central Asia. If the US is going it alone with CIS states and not involving Russia we might look to Russia's test firing of its ballistic missiles in October and on November 2nd as political messages sent the old fashioned way.

11 posted on 11/05/2001 2:47:05 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Bump to you!
12 posted on 11/05/2001 2:47:35 PM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring; struwwelpeter
What? We had the audacity to bypass the RUSSIANS when requesting use of 'former Soviet' bases in the lands no longer a part of their union of republics?

Unless we plan on crying foul when folks deal directly with the Chicoms regarding our "former" sovereign territory in Panama, I fail to see the slight here.

(Thanks so much for the flag, guy. I've missed you.)

13 posted on 11/05/2001 2:54:37 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring; sonofliberty2
The Kremlin under Putin gave the loyal (to Russia) Central Asian republics permission to provide limited basing rights to US troops and planes. Tajikistan is after all a Russian satellite state which is occupied by the 201st Motorized Rifle Division. This is all part of a prudent and calculated Russian strategy to achieve their foreign policy objectives, bringing prestige to the Russian Federation and make it a respected player on the world stage. Uzbekistan is the only republic in Central Asia with any independent ties to the West. The others including Kazakhstan are led by Communist apparachik dictators and would just as soon rejoin the Belarus-Russian Union as constituent republics of a newly reformed USSR under direct rule by Moscow.
14 posted on 11/05/2001 3:35:39 PM PST by rightwing2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WriteOn
China. . . playing both sides against the middle. . . Certainly they are artists at that. . . .paragon artists at almost any kind of negotiation with westerners. . . .at taking undue advantage etc. etc.

And then they will condescendingly look down on you with disdain, disgust, dirision for your being so stupid, ignorant and dull as to allow them to do it.

They can easily be rabidly hostile if you stand up to them and don't allow them to take unreasonable advantage of you. . . and somewhat more derisive if you do. As you can guess, some interesting double binds can multiply aplenty.

On the other hand, they can see these tendencies in themselves and lay them somewhat to mostly aside if the relationship is close enough. . . meaningful enough. . . Some can be considerably more honorable and straightforward than westerners. . . . especially when comparing Bimbo Crusher as the example westerner.

15 posted on 11/05/2001 5:43:23 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chemainus; Sawdring; JohnHuang2; Travis McGee
Our 'short term' enemies are radical islamists, our long term enemy is still China.
16 posted on 11/05/2001 7:01:38 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: Sawdring
The fact that we don't really have any substantial bases in Central Asia tells me that we are going through Russia. Now that there is talk of expanding our forces in the region, (there is probably some decent quid pro quo for Russia) that is what has the Chicom undies in a bunch.
19 posted on 11/06/2001 4:32:04 PM PST by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: a_Turk
Hey thanks for the info! I'm a huge fan of Turkey, our only true Muslim ally. Hopefully the Arab world can find some leaders more like Ataturk, for our sake and theirs.
20 posted on 11/06/2001 5:27:46 PM PST by taiwanese_superhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson