Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brain scans can reveal liars
The New Scientist ^ | 10:50 12 November 01 | Emma Young, San Diego

Posted on 11/12/2001 4:49:55 PM PST by vannrox

Brain scans can reveal whether someone is lying or telling the truth, US researchers have discovered. When people lied, fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) scans revealed significant increases in activity in several brain regions.


Daniel Langleben and his colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania hope fMRI could be used for more accurate forensic lie detection. The widely used polygraph test is based on changes in heart rate, blood pressure, breathing and the electrical resistance of the skin. But these factors can vary widely among individuals, making it more difficult to establish whether someone really is telling the truth.


Langleben's team gave 18 people an object to hide in their pockets. They were then shown a series of pictures, including one of the object itself. As each picture was presented, the participants were instructed to deny that it matched their hidden object.


When there was a match, and the person was lying, activity in several regions increased. This included the anterior cinglate, which is associated with response inhibition and error monitoring, and the adjacent right superior frontal gyrus, which plays a key role in attention.


The results suggest there is a "localised brain correlate of deception", the team says.


Saint Augustine




"The fact that deception requires extra work in a number of brain regions may indicate that the deception involves inhibition of the 'default' response - truth," adds Langleben. "Interestingly, this agrees with the traditional definition of deception dating back to Saint Augustine: 'Deception is denial of truth'."


Previous attempts to use fMRI to identify brain changes when someone is lying have failed. Langleben suspects that the simplicity of the task used in his team's experiment may help explain their success.


"The main strength of our study was adapting a simple and very well known test that has been used forensically and in research to detect deception with polygraphs and EEGs since the 1950s," he told New Scientist.


Cultural differences




However, more work is necessary before fMRI lie detection could be used for legal purposes, he says.


"Our study shows only an average difference in brain activity between lying and telling the truth in a group of young and healthy English-speaking people. In order to determine whether fMRI can be used to detect deception in any individual, much larger groups of different ages, cultures and socio-economic status should be studied."


Using fMRI also involves using large, expensive scanners, making it much less practical to use than a polygraph test.


Langleben presented his work at the Society for Neuroscience annual meeting in San Diego.




TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
A very interesting read.
1 posted on 11/12/2001 4:49:55 PM PST by vannrox (MyEMail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Similar story from last night, some good comments. Brain's one-card trick yields superior lie test ^
2 posted on 11/12/2001 4:55:08 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
hook bill up and the machine might blow to pieces!

Noslrac

3 posted on 11/12/2001 4:56:28 PM PST by Noslrac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Yeah, but after someone like Clinton fries his brain with self delusion, does it solidify and throw the results of the MRI off?
4 posted on 11/12/2001 4:57:25 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Would this work on X-42?
5 posted on 11/12/2001 4:57:36 PM PST by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
I wonder if this would work on my ex-wife?
6 posted on 11/12/2001 4:57:56 PM PST by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springman
Does X42 have any brains left to scan?
7 posted on 11/12/2001 5:00:04 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

8 posted on 11/12/2001 5:01:27 PM PST by Leroy S. Mort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Not very likely, not likely to be more effective than the lie-detector device. There is the Machiavelli hypothesis: speech only arose out of the human need to deceive. Talleyrand said,"Men were given speech so they could conceal their thoughts." Why would a function with such an origin give itself away?
9 posted on 11/12/2001 5:15:24 PM PST by Aurelius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leroy S. Mort
That's hysterical!
10 posted on 11/12/2001 5:27:43 PM PST by TX Bluebonnet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Springman
Would this work on X-42?

I only play a electro-neurologist on TV, but my guess is that all the electrical impluses
from sex-ideation in X-42 would provide so much static background that it would
be impossible for even the most advanced scanner to figure out if he was lying or not.

But in any regard, why waste the technology. Eight years proved to us that he is either
lying or just plain wrong whenever he speaks or acts!!!
11 posted on 11/12/2001 5:33:44 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

From what I understand, a properly deployed colander in a police precinct interrogation room can produce similar results.
12 posted on 11/12/2001 5:36:14 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; broomhilda; Native American Female Vet
I have a very long list, of people I would love to hook up to this gizmo!
13 posted on 11/12/2001 7:17:38 PM PST by TwoStep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palo verde
Anyone you want to test this on? ;-)
14 posted on 11/12/2001 7:20:21 PM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
Preferrably tested on elected officials, starting with Gary Condit.
15 posted on 11/12/2001 7:29:34 PM PST by JameRetief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Noslrac
Could we require hook-ups during candidate debates?
16 posted on 11/13/2001 12:30:33 AM PST by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson