Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George McGovern was right
TownHall.com ^ | Thursday, November 15, 2001 | by Cal Thomas

Posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:04 PM by JohnHuang2

TownHall.com: Conservative Columnists: Cal Thomas
QUICK LINKS: HOME | NEWS | OPINION | RIGHTPAGES | CHAT | WHAT'S NEW

townhall.com

Cal Thomas (back to story)

November 15, 2001

George McGovern was right

The publication of "Reaching for Glory: The Johnson White House Tapes, 1964-1965" by historian Michael Beschloss (Simon & Schuster) should end the argument as to who was right about the Vietnam War. George McGovern was right, and so were his Senate colleagues who opposed the war even before he did, including Mark Hatfield, R-Ore., Wayne Morse, D-Ore., and Ernest Gruening, D-Alas.

McGovern called LBJ's carpet bombing of North Vietnam "a policy of madness." It was a political statement, but the Johnson tapes reveal it might also have diagnosed Johnson's mental state.

The escalation of America's role in Vietnam began with a lie - The Gulf of Tonkin Resolution - which Johnson rammed through Congress in August, 1964, after fabricating a military confrontation between American and North Vietnamese forces, the tapes reveal. Johnson was quoted in 1965 as saying, "for all I know, our Navy was shooting at whales out there."

Beschloss says Johnson assured a Washington audience in August, 1965, that "America wins the wars that she undertakes. Make no mistake about it!" Beschloss says Johnson didn't really believe this, predicting instead to intimates, "America could never win the war in Vietnam."

Repeatedly, Johnson confides to his wife, Lady Bird, and to Sen. Richard Russell, D-Ga., that he sees no way of winning the war but cannot bring himself to withdraw American forces. Johnson believed in the "domino theory," a controversial view at the time, which said that if South Vietnam fell to the communists, other nations would follow.

In a conversation with his Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, Johnson suggests ways to finesse news that he will send 100,000 more combat troops to Vietnam, the tapes show. "Feeling trapped," Beschloss writes, "LBJ realizes that the war is racing out of his control." Johnson says to McNamara, "This is...a holding action...Now, not a damn human thinks that 50,000 or 100,000 or 150,000 (American troops) are going to end that war."

So why did he send them? In one of his most famous utterances, Johnson said he wasn't going to be the first American president to lose a war. He was and he did.

Daniel Ellsberg, a top Pentagon official in the Johnson administration, claimed four years ago to have had in his safe in 1964 records that proved LBJ planned to escalate the war after the November election. Johnson promised not "to send American boys to fight a land war in Asia," which is why a lot of people of draft age - including me - voted for him. Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater would send us to Vietnam, not Johnson.

Senators McGovern, Hatfield, Gruening and Morse took a lot of heat for their principled opposition to the war. Hatfield, a practicing Christian, was told by critics he was opposing God. The others were called communists or communist sympathizers. "America: Love It, or Leave It" was a popular slogan among war supporters, including Republicans who hated communists more than they hated The Great Society. Bob Hope presided at pro-America rallies to whip up support for the war.

The anti-war sentiment unfairly smeared our armed forces. They were, and always have been, our finest product. The Vietnam War was about the politicians and some generals who betrayed their fellow citizens and their country by fighting a war the political leadership lacked the will to win and the faith to fight.

A staggering 58,000 Americans are dead because Johnson would not listen to his inner voice, revealed on the tapes, or the voices of McGovern, Hatfield, Gruening and Morse, who many conservatives at the time labeled un-American.

Among the many lessons of Vietnam, which, as Beschloss notes, can teach us something about present and future conflicts, is that no president should have exclusive power when it comes to committing so many American lives and resources to a war.

The Johnson tapes should also teach conservatives a lesson. Many anti-war activists love this country as much as those who supported the Vietnam War. Just because someone is of a different party or persuasion does not necessarily mean they are wrong.

©2001 Tribune Media Services

townhall.com

QUICK LINKS: HOME | NEWS | OPINION | RIGHTPAGES | CHAT | WHAT'S NEW


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Quote of the Day by Faraday
1 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:04 PM by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
58,000 Americans are dead because Johnson would not listen to his inner voice

58,000 Americans are dead because Johnson did listen to his "inner voice", the one telling him to fear the Red Chinese. If he had direceted those B-52s North, well before the NVA had a chance to build up their Air Defense network, the war would have been over in 1965 or maybe '66. Even Trickey Dickey didn't find his cajones until he finally got personally PO'd at the NVA, but by that time the war really was lost, in Washington DC, and the rest of what we now call "the Blue Zone" at any rate.

2 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:16 PM by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
someone must have pinched cal's nuts.
3 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:17 PM by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
In 1961, JFK, chose to ignore the voice that screamed "Red Chinese" --- and the rest is history.

JFK not only ignored the CIA in Laos, but he also cut-off their funds and left them on their own to make their way back to the US embassy in Japan.

4 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:20 PM by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
In one of his most famous utterances, Johnson said he wasn't going to be the first American president to lose a war.

I give Cal a lot of credit for risking his conservative credentials by reminding us to be wary of big government problem solving even when there's a lot of rallying around the flag going on.

I've known all about Lyndon Johnson's insanity since I took a course on post-war foreign policy that McGovern taught at Northwestern circa 1980. McGovern never understood basic economics and I would have never voted for him, but he was a pretty sharp observer of international affairs and a good speaker. (It was also great taking his course because his notoriety resulted in his lectures being rebroadcast on radio so that I could listen to them without even leaving my girlfriend's bed on Sunday mornings.)

5 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:29 PM by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I hope Cal didn't write what I see here.

At he end of the Eisenhower administration there were approximately 330 American military in all of Viet Nam in the form of MAGs, Military advisory groups. JFK was sening men over there in earnest when I was drafted in 1961.

One of the reasons we lost was because JFK had Diem assassinated. There were excerpts from the tape recordins declassified from the Kennedy Library recording his planning it, posted on this forum about three years ago.

Th McNamara carpte bombing hit non-critical areas and marched slowly northward giving the enemy a chance to evacuate. It essentially did no damage.

That's for starters. This article is completely ignorant.

6 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:29 PM by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
What defeated America was Kennedy, Johnson, and McNamara. By 1968 there were riots in the American streets, leftist infiltration everywhere, and the situation was being undermined and becoming unsalvagable here.
7 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:30 PM by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
"If he had direceted those B-52s North, well before the NVA had a chance to build up their Air Defense network, the war would have been over in 1965 or maybe '66"

this was the really stupid policy of 'graduated response'..

we were forced to allow them to finish their air defenses and wait for them to become operational before we were allowed to hit them - that is the truth - no joke. I was there.

8 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:14:56 PM by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
George McGovern is nothing but Jane Fonda with a Schlong. If you look at Maxine Waters, Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, Henry Waxman and Shiela Jackson Lee today, you'll see the mirror image of George McGovern in the 60s and 70s.

That son of a B carped on Nixon constantly. He made John McCain look like a choir boy by comparison. He was the darling of the media. They couldn't get enough of the guy.

Johnson brought our troop levels up the 550,000 and McGovern and his ilk never forgave Nixon for it. Laugh? That's no joke. Nixon would bomb the hell out of the supply lines. He'd start to make headway and McGovern and his crew would demand that he stop. Our boys would get relief when the supply lines were bombed. McGoven couldn't have cared less that bombing halts would let the enemy resupply. That happened a number of times.

His claim was that we were hurting the poor average Vietnamese family. But for all his bleading heart caring for the people of the region, he never uttered a peep when Pol Pot killed upwards of half the population of Cambodia subsequent to our withdrawel from the region. Neither did that caring Jane Fonda.

Imagine we're trying to run the war in Afghanistan right now. Then imagine that Bush ran supplies through Tagikistan or Uzbechistan. Then imagine that Henry Waxman would stand up on the floor of Congress and charge him with malfeasance for doing so. That's what McGovern and his ilk were doing to Nixon for bombing supply lines in Cambodia. It was disgusting.

The NVC wouldn't even come to the peace table. Nixon bombed the crap out of the ports of Hanoi. After a few weeks of that the NVC were begging us to come to the peace table. And McGovern and his ilk demanded that Nixon stop the bombing immediately.

George McGovern and those who supported the likes of Jane Fonda, the peace protesters and the likes of Bill Clinton prolonged the war by years. They impaired the President's ability to wage war. They hamstrung Nixon at every opportunity. The truth was, they were terrified that Nixon could wage war when it was clear as day that their party didn't know a bayonet from a garter belt.

When I hear people sing the praises of McGovern it makes me sick to my stomach. That man cost us many lives.

We have made many advances in the years since Vietnam. But our air power over the North was massive. We could have won that war if we had waged it. And I'll never forgive McGovern and his panty waste bastard friends who kept Nixon from waging the war in such as manner as to win it.

9 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:06 PM by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Johnson and McNamara were utter failures. McNamara was so inept that I seriously think the man should have been brought up on charges for even pretending to lead out. Johnson should have been impeached for his abysmal performance. These two men probably rotated through in excess of 750,000 men before Johnson left. There were 550,000 on the ground when Nixon took over. And Johnson did this knowing full well he had no plan to win or extract. He was an utter failure as a President. He gave us the great society and the debacle of Vietnam. Need I say more.
10 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:06 PM by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is the worst article I've read by Cal Thomas. It's an embarassment to him. The anti-war protesters in the 70s were not so much anti-war as they were anti-US. The trips to North Vietnam, the marxist idiology that was endorced and the funding that found it's way into the peace movement revealed far more than the protesters chants alone did.

Many joined these protests out of good will. But most of them were unwitting dups for the NVC war machine. They were for our boys. Bring them home. Let the poor Asians live in peace. But when the boys did come home they spit on them. And when Cambodia imploded these jackasses were nowhere to be found.

Cal Thomas forgets a hell of a lot to make the comment that McGovern was right. McGovern has never been right in his life.

11 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:07 PM by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Yep, Cal just lost me utterly. He is now on my " THOSE WHO KNOW NOTHING / SHILL " list. I wonder what bit him.
12 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:07 PM by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Speaking of the failures, did you ever read Lewis Sorley's, A BETTER WAR ?? While your criticisms are absolutely correct, I'd just add that Westmoreland pretty much was a moron in planning the attrition strategy.

Creighton Abrams was on his way to winning that war(along with help from JP Vann.) Too bad that the Commie agitprop team had already won the war for the murderous thugs of the Khmer Rouge, Pathet Lao, and NVC.

13 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:07 PM by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Oh he was probably tired and didn't think things through. I think he focused on the Johnson tapes and wanted to make some comments, but got on a line of thought without looking back to what really went on. I think that can happen once in a while. Usually he's fairly descent.

I have to admit I am rather rabid on this topic. I watched those a.h. protesters on my television screen. I did nothing. I was around when our boys came home from the war and I didn't go out of my way to welcome them. To be honest, I'm not sure what I could have done. But as I grew older I told myself I'd never let it happen again. And I'll tell you, when someone starts singing the praises of George McGovern, I'm gonna chomp on em like a rhotwiler!

14 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:07 PM by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
Thanks for the comments. I remember Westmorland, but not the nitty gritty concerning him. I know there was plenty of blame to go around. I'd have to say that Johnson laid a very poor staffing foundation, then failed to develop a clear strategy. If he didn't have one, and didn't know the right men to install, he should have pulled our men out and conceded. Once you put your men in you wage the worst m.f'n campaign you can until the enemy begs for terms.
15 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:08 PM by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
The left-wing U.S. media lost the war in Vietnam. That and a lack of commitment by the President (Johnson, mainly).

Primarily the Pulitzer Prize winning story of the My Lai massacre by Seymour Hersh. But it didn't work the third time he tried it this month in Afghanistan. And he tried the same thing in the Gulf War accusing the 24th Division of another "massacre."

16 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:08 PM by Z-28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
All I can say is Cal Thomas (who I normally like and respect) must have been on a college deferment during the Vietnam War, because he's got his head up his a#% on this article.
17 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:08 PM by Z-28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Z-28
Funny how the 4,000 massacred as part of OFFICIAL POLICY by the NVA in Hue(many with their celebratory Tet costumes still on) were ignored by the media, eh? Or the fact that, as a rule for the entire insurgency, the VC/NVA cadres used terror and assassination of ANYONE affiliated with the US/RVN, even teachers and infrastructure workers. These killings numbered in the tens of thousands before the Commies even took the South in 75.

What's most telling is that the Left doesn't listen to the people who FLED these regimes. Very few Vietnamese or Cambodian refugees speak fondly for the Communists. In fact, many(rightly so) view Ho Chi Minh as a Stalin/Hitler like figure, not even a misguided nationalist.

18 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:08 PM by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: XBob
Bump for the truth!

Meanwhile Johnson was advocating more trade with the commies we knew were financing the Viet Cong!

Click here to learn the truth about the treasonist Johnson.

19 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:08 PM by Verax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RLK
At he end of the Eisenhower administration there were approximately 330 American military in all of Viet Nam in the form of MAGs, Military advisory groups. JFK was sening men over there in earnest when I was drafted in 1961. See my post #4. The man I married was that CIA voice screaming "Red Chinese."
20 posted on 11/16/2001, 9:15:09 PM by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson