Skip to comments.
Santa Claus Needs Help: XBox or GameCube? (North Pole Vanity)
11/15/2001
| Earl B.
Posted on 11/16/2001 1:19:03 PM PST by Earl B.
Christmas is coming, and Santa Claus knows a little boy who is almost 8 years old and who has been very good this year. Santa thinks this little boy deserves to get a video gaming system for Christmas - but doesn't know whether the best system for this young man would be Microsoft's XBox, or Nintendo's GameCube.
Are there any Freeper Gamers out there who can offer Santa some insight on the question of XBox versus GameCube? Does anybody know what the "buzz" is among the youngsters about which is the "must have" system for that age group?
Santa Appreciates your help.
TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Please note: this thread is not intended to initiate (1) a round of Microsoft bashing, or (2) an impassioned discussion about how horrible it is that Santa would consider ruining the little boy's life with a video game console.
Thanks again.
1
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:03 PM PST
by
Earl B.
To: Earl B.
The X, for sure.
To: Earl B.
Honestly, for an 8 year old (and I'm gonna bet I'll be bucking the trend here), I'd say go with the Gamecube, just because there's likely to be more games targeted at the slightly younger gamer. I make no claims about the technical superiority of either system, but the Gamecube is going to run $199 versus $299 for the XBox, and the titles for both are going to be rather thin until after Christmas anyway.
To: Earl B.
I'd have to agree with general_re. Kids love the Mario, Pokemon, and Zelda. That's a one-system boat right there. With most of the XBox games, you can either get them on other consoles, or get them on your PC. There's nothing special about it, really.
4
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:04 PM PST
by
Dan Nunn
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: Crusty_Pant_Suit
He'll shoot his eye out.
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Earl B.
8
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:05 PM PST
by
thefactor
To: Earl B.
A good friend (and self-proclaimed tech/game geek just got back from Comdex, and looked at many aspects of the XBox there, where it was showcased. He said it was very disappointed (and not because it is from MS). It is just not a great console. If you've got a little one, Nintendo is always for "kid friendly" in its game selection. Hope this helps.
To: Earl B.
I'm in the game industry, and have been lusting after an XBox ever since I was first briefed on the system two years ago. And I despise Nintendo's games, their business practices and the fact that their machine doesn't play DVDs.
Having said all that, however, if I had an 8-year-old, I'd buy him a GameCube. The games for that platform are unquestionably skewed younger than those for either PS2 or XBox. I think GameCube will have fewer titles overall (thanks to those business practices I mentioned), but it will have such a higher percentage of kid-friendly titles that it's the clear winner for the under-12 set.
10
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:05 PM PST
by
Fabozz
To: Earl B.
To be perfectly honest, if you don't have a Playstation 2, it's the best choice of the 3.
Right now, there are only two really good games for Gamecube and two really good games for X-Box, and there are about 20 REALLY good games for PS2.
Ask again in 6 months or a year and the answer might change, but for now, PS2 is unquestionably the best way to maximize your holiday fun.
11
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:05 PM PST
by
tgiles
To: Earl B.
As you can see, XBOX kicks butt in processing speed, memory, etc... Plus it can be used as a DVD player (as can Playstation 2, but Game Cube is not DVD able).
To: tgiles
Plus, the Playstation2 can play all of the Playstation 1 games out there, so you have the entire library of PS1 games to choose from as well, and there's lots of kids games for PS1 (and you can find them cheap at used game stores, garage sales, etc.) PS2 is the way to go.
13
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:06 PM PST
by
egarvue
To: tgiles
Was just reading some info on "/.". A poster brought up a good point, if you are going to play console games on anything voer 32", you may want to consider the Xbox. It can handle the resolutions better than the cube and PS2. Just my 2 bits...
To: Earl B.
Honestly, for an 8 year old (and I'm gonna bet I'll be bucking the trend here), I'd say go with the Gamecube, just because there's likely to be more games targeted at the slightly younger gamer. I also agree. The demo units I saw side-to-side show better graphics for x-box. They may be difficult to find although I snagged one today. You can use the x-box to play DVD's. You can go to xbox.com to see trailers for the games and decide if appropriate for an 8-yr old.
15
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:06 PM PST
by
steveo
To: steveo
Yeah, the X-Box will play DVD's, but it's my understanding that you have to buy a $30-40 add-on to get it to do so. The PS2 will play them out of the box.
16
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:07 PM PST
by
TopDog2
To: Earl B.
Also, remember, when it comes to the selection of games available, with either system, the first wave of games is ususally not a very good barometer of what will be avaialble down the road, as far as selection or quality.
To: Earl B.
I appreciate all the comments. I have been debating and researching for a while. It seems XBox has a bit more horsepower, and may be geared for an older group. And it has the DVD player (though not a really great one, apparently - no progressive scan).
Nintendo is cheaper, if not as robust. Seems to be geared for the kids. The Nintendo name seems (so far) to carry a little more weight with the younger crowd. Kids like the proprietary Nintendo games.
I suppose my biggest concern is: I don't want to have to buy another system in a year or two because I picked the "loser" system that isn't being supported with good games down the road.
I think I was leaning XBox at first because of the better hardware. I'm probably leaning GameCube now because of the apparent "Kid-Friendly" factor.
18
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:07 PM PST
by
Earl B.
To: thefactor
As you can see, XBOX kicks butt in processing speed, memory, etc...
Yes, but Nintendo has something Microsoft will never have -
Shigeru Miyamoto.
To: Earl B.
If you want to play Tomb Raider, I think you have to have Sony Play Station 2.
Think PS2 has this market wraped up. The other two are just fighting for the leftovers.
20
posted on
11/16/2001 1:19:07 PM PST
by
Recluse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson