Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

States Consider Tax Increases
AP | 11/16/01 | ROBERT TANNER

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:25 PM PST by kattracks

Nov 16, 2001 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- With their finances rapidly souring, several states are considering reversing course and raising taxes after a seven-year run of tax cuts.

On Thursday, Indiana Gov. Frank O'Bannon went on statewide television to call for budget cuts and increased taxes to overcome a fiscal crisis that "threatens our very way of life." Virginia Gov. Jim Gilmore announced he won't be able to fulfill a campaign promise and eliminate a much-hated tax on cars and trucks.

So far, North Carolina is the only state to pass a significant tax hike. But the idea has top support in Indiana and Ohio, while cuts passed or promised last year are now looking shakier in Massachusetts, New York and elsewhere, besides Virginia.

Even those opposed say the question, at least, can't be avoided.

"We really have no option," said South Carolina Rep. Bobby Harrell, the Republican chair of the House budget-writing committee. "We're either going to have to cut the budgets or raise taxes. ... There are going to be problems like this all across the country."

Emergency budget-cutting continued this week with special legislative sessions in Arizona and Connecticut, following emergency actions by Florida, Hawaii, Iowa and beyond. Since all states except for Vermont must balance their budgets, state lawmakers can't approve deficit spending like their congressional counterparts.

Forty-four states saw revenue growth fall from August through October, according to a Nov. 1 report from the National Conference of State Legislatures. Budget cuts were passed or on the table in 28 states, the report said.

Now, with the states' already weak economies worsening after Sept. 11, these tax issues have emerged:

-Ohio Gov. Bob Taft, a Republican facing a $1.5 billion deficit, wants $465 million in targeted business tax increases.

-North Carolina, with the encouragement of Democratic Gov. Mike Easley, raised taxes by $620 million in the new budget passed in September.

There are also proposals for new taxes in Alabama, Wyoming, Tennessee, and Washington state.

"We just concluded there's only so much you can cut," said North Carolina Rep. Paul Luebke, a Democrat who sits on the House finance committee. "We're one of the few (states) that have the courage to bite the cliched bullet," said Luebke.

If the economy continues to slide, the pressure will build to increase revenue to pay for government services, economists say. But tax proposals - almost always unpopular with voters - face bruising tests in legislatures. Many leaders remain adamantly opposed.

"Asking Arkansas families who are already wounded from a hurting economy to pay even more in taxes - that would be like asking a bleeding friend to donate a pint of blood," Gov. Mike Huckabee said in a statewide television address Wednesday.

Tax cuts, on the other hand, have proven popular. Since 1995, states cut an aggregate $36 billion in taxes, the NCSL said. That includes $1.8 billion cut last year, when forecasters already predicted the economy would slow.

Those cuts followed several years of tax increases, with a high of $15.4 billion in 1991 during the height of the early '90s recession.

"Politically it is very difficult" to raise taxes, said Harley Duncan, executive director of the Federation of Tax Administrators, a group that monitors state economies. "Many of these elected officials ran on a very firm no-tax-increase platform. But the sands really shifted beneath them."

While the pressure for new or increased taxes might be building, it depends on how long the hard times last, economists said.

"Ask me the question two months from now," said Arturo Perez, a fiscal analyst with NCSL. "We know it's getting worse. But have we seen the worst times behind us, or is there a continuing slide?"

In a fiscal crisis, state budget writers say, the first steps are to cut spending, delay big projects and dip into cash reserves that were built up over the years.

Some already have: Wisconsin froze hiring, Connecticut warns it will lay off workers, North Carolina has put off a $1.5 million renovation of the governor's mansion.

Some say previous tax cuts set states up for an economic stumble. Harrell, in South Carolina, rejects that argument. The problem is that budget forecasters didn't accurately prepare for the slowing economy, he said.

But forecasters were warning things eventually would slow down, and were quick to note the drop in tax collections, Sept. 11 and its economic aftershocks have caused an even steeper downturn.

---

On the Net:

National Conference of State Legislatures: http://www.ncsl.org

Rockefeller Institute of Government: http://www.rockinst.org

By ROBERT TANNER AP National Writer

Copyright 2001 Associated Press, All rights reserved


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:26 PM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The economy's tanking, so....let's increase taxes! Brilliant!
2 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:26 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billybudd
"The economy's tanking, so....let's increase taxes! Brilliant!"

The economy's tanking, so Bush hastens to cut federal taxes.

The states are hastening to do just the opposite.

Only one of these moves can be correct...

3 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:26 PM PST by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Talicrat thug filth all over the nation at every level are using our country's crisis of war to push their socialist agenda through the back door, in complete disregard for the desperate straits of true working people who are but a paycheck from the streets themselves. Democommies are truly the scum of the Earth. We will sooner or later have to oust them by force like their lawless, criminal, ideological kindred Taliban was by force, since Democrats openly violate law and ignore the Constitution at the same time they are insulting and pissing on the American taxpaying citizen, even accusing us of being responsible for the 9/11 terrorist attacks ala Bill Clit-on and his stupid wife Hitlery.
4 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:27 PM PST by Imperial Warrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
It does no good for Bush to cut taxes, and have the States take that much tax back and more.

The only one that helps is Bush politically, by claiming to have cut Federal tax, in reality, with the States grabbing it on the other end, you have no tax cut.

5 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:27 PM PST by KeepTheEdge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: okie01
If a certain level of taxes have to be spent on government functions, it's best to keep their control as close to their source as possible. Fedguv spending is a real hogwallow of pork, and so big and sloppy it can't even be accurately accounted for. States, even big liberal taxers, are positively obsessive penny counting misers compared to Uncle Sam. In a more constitutional order, the states would be the biggest spenders and the feds would be paying for nothing more than Constitutionally unavoidable functions.
6 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:27 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
We held off buying a new vehicle because of the 4.5% Virginia personal property tax, which is quite a chunk to pay every year, especially when you are not in a very high income bracket. Then when they said they were going to eleminate it, we finally bought one.

I am truly beginning to HATE politicians.

7 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:27 PM PST by Dustbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dustbunny
When my sis and her husband moved to Viginia, he waited about 6 months to get his VA plates for his new Jeep and had to pay through the nose for "property tax", close to $2k. He was pissed. I mean hell, it is HIS Jeep, but apparently he does not have a RIGHT to own it unless he pays the thugs...JFK
8 posted on 11/16/2001 1:22:27 PM PST by BADROTOFINGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks; mykdsmom; amundsen; Darth Reagan
""We just concluded there's only so much you can cut," said North Carolina Rep. Paul Luebke, a Democrat who sits on the House finance committee. "We're one of the few (states) that have the courage to bite the cliched bullet," said Luebke."

Luebke added, "You know, I've never seen a tax I didn't love."

10 posted on 11/16/2001 1:23:59 PM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: KeepTheEdge
It does no good for Bush to cut taxes, and have the States take that much tax back and more.

It does no good for the current economic situation, but I'd much sooner pay taxes to my state than the federal government. Accountability is much higher - I can find my state rep. and demand my say. No such luck with Arlen Specter.

13 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:02 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I agree with the notion that State and Local Tax, usually provides greater return to the donor.

With the ever increasing demands of Government, without votes, to raise taxes, this is the reason so many Local Tax Levys are defeated at the ballot box.

The Populace rarely has a voice in larger taxes, and when given the chance in the form of local levy and bond issues, they increasingly just say no, because of the enormous burden of Federal Taxes.

14 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:06 PM PST by KeepTheEdge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I agree with the notion that State and Local Tax, usually provides greater return to the donor.

With the ever increasing demands of Government, without votes, to raise taxes, this is the reason so many Local Tax Levys are defeated at the ballot box.

The Populace rarely has a voice in larger taxes, and when given the chance in the form of local levy and bond issues, they increasingly just say no, because of the enormous burden of Federal Taxes.

15 posted on 11/16/2001 1:24:08 PM PST by KeepTheEdge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
There's too many people in the public sector, and not enough in the private.
16 posted on 12/01/2001 8:40:12 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; pigdog
Consumption is far more stable than income.

Simply eliminate all taxes on income and replace them with a single sales tax. That would prevent the tax cut/tax increase game.

17 posted on 12/01/2001 8:44:28 AM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Dismantle funding for public schools. They are the lion's share of most state's budgets.
18 posted on 01/11/2002 12:54:42 PM PST by ServesURight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson