Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2nd Anthrax Drug's Adequacy Questioned; 4 Who Died Received Levaquin First
The Washington Post ^ | November 19, 2001 | Avram Goldstein

Posted on 11/19/2001 12:00:27 PM PST by tgslTakoma

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:34 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The four people who died of inhalational anthrax last month were treated primarily with an antibiotic that most doctors have considered equivalent to Cipro, the drug given to the six patients who survived the disease.

Most doctors interviewed last week said it was not statistically meaningful to associate the antibiotic Levaquin with any pattern of unsuccessful anthrax treatment. And they said those who died were thought to have been hospitalized too late for any drug to save them.


(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
It is interesting that all 4 of the people who died from inhalational anthrax were treated with Levaquin, at least initially. It's also difficult for me to believe, after 4 anthrax deaths, that Levaquin is an effective alternative to Cipro (and possibly doxycycline) for treatment of anthrax infection.

At first I thought that maybe Levaquin was a cheaper alternative drug than Cipro, as is doxycycline. I did a little research on web and found that Levaquin is the most expensive of the three drugs (info from Johns Hopkins: Cipro=$7-9/day, Doxycycline=$1/day, Levaquin=$8/day); so now I don't know what to think regarding why doctors chose to treat patients with Levaquin first. I'm not a doc, so can't really offer anything other than speculation... if it's not cost, maybe it's kickbacks to hospitals that led them to stock one drug over another. (I am a big cynic)

1 posted on 11/19/2001 12:00:28 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
My understanding of the problem is that, with inhalational antrhax, by the time you get sick, it's too late. The antibiotics will kill the anthrax, but the anthrax has already filled you with a fatal dose of its toxin. In other words, it doesn't much matter how effective the antibiotic is.

What is needed to treat inhalational victims is an antitoxin, i.e., a drug that neutralizes the toxin directly, much as an antivenin counteracts snake venom.

2 posted on 11/19/2001 1:59:39 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cynwoody
It could be that Levaquin is too good. The anthrax toxins (I believe) are endotoxins, thus released when the anthrax cells die. Kill them all at once and you get a flood, kill them slow and you get a survivable dose.
3 posted on 11/19/2001 3:03:53 PM PST by dmcnash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aristeides; Alamo-Girl; Nita Nupress
An interesting part of the anthrax story that has gone unnoticed here.
4 posted on 11/21/2001 7:00:05 PM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Oh, now THIS is interesting. Both Levaquin and Cipro are fluoroquinolones, so I'm not sure if the deaths would be related to the administration of Levaquin in any way. But I'm with the specialist: this needs to be closely examined with animal studies and more research just to make sure. With a cohort size of ten, though, I'm not sure how well you could generalize the results. Thanks for the flag! I'll keep my eyes open and see if I can dig anything up.
5 posted on 11/21/2001 7:50:15 PM PST by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress
According to the article, Levaquin was not approved for treating inhalation anthrax but Cipro was. Read the entire article and print it out before the link expires. It has some good reporting in it.
6 posted on 11/21/2001 9:02:57 PM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Ken Alibek in his book Biohazard describes a case of (cutaneous) anthrax (in the Soviet Union) that was so far-gone that it was thought the victim was going to die. He was finally administered massive doses of what Alibek calls "antiserum" -- I assume this is the antitoxin -- and survived. Why isn't that being done for far-gone cases in this country?
7 posted on 11/22/2001 2:35:40 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Thanks for the heads up!
8 posted on 11/23/2001 8:24:19 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson