Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN Snubs Israel Plea With Strong Criticsim
Ananova ^ | 12-04-2001

Posted on 12/04/2001 7:13:20 AM PST by blam

UN snubs Israel plea with strong criticism

The United Nations General Assembly has ignored Israel's plea to reject Palestinian terrorism.

Instead the body has strongly criticised Israel's policies toward the Palestinians.

Israel's UN Ambassador had appealed to the other 188 nations to detach themselves from resolutions which he said would endow Palestine with international legitimacy.

But the General Assembly voted in favour of the four Palestinian-related resolutions, which each received over 100 "Yes" votes from about 160 nations that voted.

The key resolution backed Palestinian rights to an independent state on the basis of "land for peace" and called for an Israeli withdrawal and a return to negotiations on a final peace settlement.

"We are very satisfied," the Palestinian UN observer, Nasser Al-Kidwa, said afterwards, accusing Israel of doing everything it could "to sabotage all efforts to resume this peace process."

Jordan's UN ambassador, Prince Zeid Al-Hussein, one of the last speakers in the debate, denounced Israel's latest "military acts of aggression ... and their use of unjustified power".

Last year, the United States was the only country to join Israel in voting against all four Palestinian-related resolutions. This year, two small Pacific island nations, the Marshall Islands and Micronesia, also voted against the four resolutions.

The key resolution, entitled "Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine," was approved by a vote of 131 to six, with 20 abstentions.

A number of countries - including Britain, the Netherlands, Norway, Australia, Denmark, Paraguay and Germany - said they abstained because it was not evenhanded in condemning attacks against civilians on both sides.

Story filed: 08:14 Tuesday 4th December 2001


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 12/04/2001 7:13:20 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam


2 posted on 12/04/2001 7:27:56 AM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
this is what israel must deal with. only in the bizarro world of the UN are victims attacked and terrorists worshipped. israel is alone in the world except for it's one true friend, the united states. i wish we could get the cesspool known as the UN out of new york, it's a constant reminder of their antipathy towards the US and israel.
3 posted on 12/04/2001 7:34:51 AM PST by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: contessa machiaveli
'i wish we could get the cesspool known as the UN out of new york, it's a constant reminder of their antipathy towards the US and israel.'

And yet, without US support, the UN would simply cease to exist. Like they're saying in Afghanistan, its getting hard to tell the good guys from the bad guys anymore.

4 posted on 12/04/2001 7:49:00 AM PST by Ridin' Shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
The U.N. became irrelevant on 9/11/01
5 posted on 12/04/2001 7:54:13 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Abolish the UN it should be replaced with a 'civilized alliance' which would include all true american allies with free market economic systems.
6 posted on 12/04/2001 9:51:29 AM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
The UN has declared itself to be an unrepentant terror hosting body. When do we freeze their assets in NY?
7 posted on 12/04/2001 9:54:12 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Pissed Off Janitor
bump, needs to be said again and again.
9 posted on 12/04/2001 10:07:11 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
okay I have a quick question. Did not the UN *create* the state of Israel in 1948? If so, then why are they now turning their backs on them? If this is incorrect, I'm sure I will be duly corrected. But if it is, then I want to know why this is happening.
10 posted on 12/04/2001 10:11:51 AM PST by PurVirgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson