Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Emerson Case Being Appealed to the Supreme Court!!!
Second Ammendment Foundation (email alert) ^ | Thu, 6 Dec 2001 | David LaCourse

Posted on 12/06/2001 7:44:27 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig

Dear Second Amendment Supporters,

On Friday, November 30th the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected both of Dr. Emerson's motions for rehearings.

This leaves an appeal to the United States Supreme Court as the only option for Dr. Emerson. Attorneys David Guinn and Aaron Clements are working on drafting the Appeal.

This appeal is necessary because while the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals clearly and articulately held that the Second Amendment is an individual right, Dr. Emerson is still facing federal felony charges because of an anti-gun rights prosecutor.

The importance of a U.S. Supreme Court victory cannot be overstated. Such a decision is crucial to destroy the "collective rights" myth perpetrated by every gun control group and many courts without any historical analysis of the Second Amendment or its placement in the Bill of Rights.

If the Second Amendment is affirmed by the highest Court as an individual right, AND the federal gun law is overturned as in the District Court decision, many other draconian gun laws could likely be ruled unconstitutional. This includes sweeping gun bans, excessive bureaucratic red tape, and arbitrary and capricious discrimination in denying licenses to name but a few of many current abuses. A victory for the individual interpretation would be especially helpful for those people living in places like California, New York, New Jersey, Washington, D.C. and Chicago.

In truth, while a Fifth Circuit victory would have been helpful, it would only be binding in the states of Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi.

A U.S. Supreme Court victory for Dr. Emerson would force all the lower courts throughout the country to recognize the Second Amendment as an individual right in future cases.

But with this appeal comes risk. If the Supreme Court decides to take this case, the Supreme Court will write its own opinion regarding the Second Amendment. And since Dr. Emerson is appealing the decision to prevent further prosecution, it is our obligation to make sure that the gains we have made are retained in any further decisions, and hopefully they will be strengthened.

To conduct a proper defense, Dr. Emerson's attorneys need funds immediately. The Second Amendment Foundation's Emerson Defense Fund and its supporters: the Fifty Caliber Shooters Policy Institute, the Washington Arms Collectors, and www.KeepAndBearArms.com KeepAndBearArms.com have provided nearly $15,000 to Dr. Emerson's Defense already.

Thank you to all who have contributed to the Emerson Defense Fund. But more is needed because the appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court is our best and only shot. I honestly can't think of another Second Amendment case in the country that could reach the U.S. Supreme Court in the near future that could be seen as favorably as the Emerson case.

Emerson is literally the most important Second Amendment case in over a half century. And if we lose this appeal, then the gun grabbers will unleash the mother-of-all gun control proposals. Without the fear of the Second Amendment, their real agenda will be revealed once again -- gun bans!

Please help us today, as the appeal must be filed within 90 days from the Fifth Circuits Denial and the clock is ticking. Funding for the appeal must begin right now.

The SAF Emerson Defense Fund is tax-deductible and your contributions will help defend your rights of firearms ownership for you, your children and your grandchildren.

Please give $1000, $500 or $100, $50, $25 or whatever you can afford to this crucial effort. This case is too important to lose for lack of funding.

I repeat, the entire Emerson decision upholding the Second Amendment as an individual right is at risk in this appeal. Whether we win or lose could rest on how much people contribute to this worthy cause.

Please contribute on-line today via our secure server here

Or, please call 425-454-7012 to make a donation over the phone during Pacific Time Business Hours with your credit card, or send your check of money order made out to SAF Emerson Defense to the following address:

SAF Emerson Defense
12500 NE 10th Place
Bellevue, WA 98005

Or, you can fax a credit card donation to 425-451-3959.

Please give today, as the rights you save may be your own.

Sincerely,
Dave LaCourse
SAF Legal Affairs Director

P.S. Please give today, as we must make sure that Dr. Emerson's attorneys have the support they need. Please review the press release below for more details. Thanks for your time.

SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION LAUNCHES THE EMERSON DEFENSE FUND
For Immediate Release:
Contact: Alan Gottlieb (425) 454-7012

BELLEVUE, WA - The Second Amendment Foundation has launched a defense fund to assist Dr. Timothy Joe Emerson in these continuing appeals. The move is to help preserve the stunning 5th Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as an individual right.

"The Emerson decision was a huge victory for all law-abiding gun owners as we finally established in a very thorough and well-researched opinion that the Second Amendment is an individual right," stated Alan Gottlieb, Founder of the Second Amendment Foundation. "Now we must fight to preserve this win in appeals and hopefully even build on the decision to make it even stronger."

Because the court's decision in U.S. v Emerson was to reverse and remand a lower court ruling that cleared Dr. Timothy Joe Emerson of a federal violation of the 1994 Domestic Violence Act, Dr. Emerson's attorneys David Guinn and Aaron Clements will be appealing the portion of the decision which would force Dr. Emerson to endure a trial for a boilerplate civil divorce court restraining order that ended with the finalization of the divorce.

"Continuing to prosecute Dr. Emerson for a long-since expired order is unfair and just plain wrong since Dr. Emerson has been cleared of all domestic violence related charges in state court by a jury of 9 women and 3 men in less than an hour of deliberations," reminded Gottlieb.

"Until the government agrees to drop the simple possession of a firearm while subject to a civil divorce court order, both Dr. Emerson and the Second Amendment remain at risk."

"I call on all the other national, state and local gun owner civil rights groups to join with the Second Amendment Foundation in funding this all-important legal battle," added Gottlieb.

In the Emerson appeal decision, the 5th Circuit clearly ruled that the Second Amendment guarantees the right of an individual citizen to keep and bear private arms, "regardless of whether the particular individual is then actually a member of the militia."

Writing for the majority, Judge William Garwood noted that the government's long-standing interpretation of the 1939 Miller case, that the Second Amendment merely expresses a "collective right" is not supported by the actual Miller decision.

"The wisdom of this decision must be preserved," said Gottlieb. "As a leader in firearm owner civil rights defense, the Second Amendment Foundation is very proud to be working closely with Dr. Emerson's attorneys to protect the Second Amendment and hopefully end this nightmare for Dr. Emerson once and for all."

The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. SAF previously has funded successful firearms-related suits against the cities of Los Angeles, New Haven, CT, and San Francisco on behalf of American gun owners. Current projects include a damage action lawsuit against the cities suing gun makers, an amicus brief in support of the Emerson case holding that the Second Amendment is an individual right, a lawsuit against the Clinton gun and magazine ban and a lawsuit in Cincinnati supporting the right of self-defense carry of firearms.

Please visit the best Emerson webpage at www.saf.org -END-


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
I did a search and couldn't find this on the bang_list or otherwise anywhere on the FR radar screen.
1 posted on 12/06/2001 7:44:28 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *bang_list; Billthedrill; backhoe; Travis McGee; Squantos; Libertina; Inspector Harry Callahan...
FYI
2 posted on 12/06/2001 7:45:54 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
.
3 posted on 12/06/2001 7:47:11 PM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Thanks harry, look at the first reply. You really are quick on the draw, or is that considered a double tap?!
4 posted on 12/06/2001 7:48:53 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Tax-Free 2A Supporting Donations Bump!

I wonder if my employer will match????

5 posted on 12/06/2001 7:55:16 PM PST by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: big ern
A victory for the individual interpretation would be especially helpful for those people living in places like California, New York, New Jersey, Washington, D.C. and Chicago.

Don't forget Massachusetts.

6 posted on 12/06/2001 7:56:54 PM PST by AStack75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fixit
Maybe, do you work for HCI?LOL
7 posted on 12/06/2001 7:58:12 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: big ern
hehehe.. Thanks for the bump. My dial-up is smokin' tonight. ;^)
8 posted on 12/06/2001 7:58:45 PM PST by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Maybe, do you work for HCI?

Careful there, them are fighting words!

;-)


9 posted on 12/06/2001 7:59:39 PM PST by Fixit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AStack75
Not even that would help Mass., your beyond help. HA.
10 posted on 12/06/2001 8:00:09 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Emerson bump!
11 posted on 12/06/2001 8:01:19 PM PST by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Until the government agrees to drop the simple possession of a firearm while subject to a civil divorce court order, both Dr. Emerson and the Second Amendment remain at risk."

The odds that SCOTUS will grant cert on this case are slim to none. What is in controversy is Emerson's legal troubles interfering with his claimed right to possess a firearm. There is no conflict between appellate circuits. The issue is narrow, and not otherwise ripe for a SCOTUS decision. The attempt to wrap the second amendment around this case to give it sweeping importance is feeble.

12 posted on 12/06/2001 8:09:12 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
You a lawyer, or just trying to pee in our punch?

I suppose the answer could be both.

Why can't the SCOTUS affirm the individual right, agree that some restrictions are allowed, but find that the boilerplate striking down of a constitutional right without due process is unconstitutional.

That is when the protection order is being discussed and the defendant and accuser are getting their say in court, some mention of the loss of 2nd ammendment rights should take place and be considered.

13 posted on 12/06/2001 8:18:42 PM PST by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: big ern
PERSONALLY

THIS GUN CASE NEEDS A WHOLE BUNCH OF PRAYER

I don't by any stretch consider all the court justices sane on such an issue. I realize "those who live by the sword will die by the sword." However, I believe God had a strong hand in insuring this was in our founding document. I believe in some areas, for some extended period of time, the degree of gun ownership may well directly effect the degree of freedom of believers to survive. This is not an "evangelism" issue. That does NOT make it unimportant to pray for.

14 posted on 12/06/2001 8:21:24 PM PST by Quix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: big ern
Bump for Emerson. SAF has been excellent on this so far.

I'm afraid SCOTUS won't touch it, but ya never know.
BTW - Who is the Head Judge for that area? Please be Thomas.

15 posted on 12/06/2001 8:21:39 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Unfortunatly, I tend to agree. I don't think they want to step in this hornet's nest.
16 posted on 12/06/2001 8:22:27 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: big ern
I am a lawyer, although not a constitutional expert. I gave you my opinion (SCOTUS won't take up the case). I am quite confident about it. We shall see.
17 posted on 12/06/2001 8:24:15 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
The issue is too limited. SCTOUS isn't interested in deciding who is a bad boy and who is just a naughty boy, absent evidence of widespread abuse. SCOTUS will only take up the second amendment when the issue is clearly joined as to whether there is a right to possess a gun outside an organized militia. And they won't be happy about taking that case. I think the common wisdom among elite legal circles is that the ambiguity about a somewhat ambiguous amendment is the best course at present.
18 posted on 12/06/2001 8:28:30 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
There need to be 4 votes to grant cert.
19 posted on 12/06/2001 8:29:49 PM PST by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Torie
It's so much of a hornet's nest. I bet they are all saying - "I'm not touching this. I don't want the Buck here". No one want to be the ones saying flat out "There is an individual right." or "There is no right".
20 posted on 12/06/2001 8:32:18 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson