Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gun Control Group Launches Campaign
AP ^ | Thursday December 6 6:25 PM ET | MARK SHERMAN

Posted on 12/07/2001 6:36:34 AM PST by Jean S

WASHINGTON (AP) - Gun sales are up since Sept. 11 and some manufacturers are pitching models by alluding to the terrorist attacks. Gun control advocates accuse the firearms industry of trying to profit from tragedy.

Nan Aron, president of the Washington-based Alliance for Justice, Rep. Henry Waxman (news - bio - voting record), D-Calif., and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (news - bio - voting record), D-N.Y., held a news conference Thursday to draw attention to gun-makers' marketing efforts.

The Ithaca Gun Co. is selling a line of ``Homeland Security'' pump-action shotguns ``in our current time of national need,'' according to the company's Web site. Another Web link Aron and Waxman displayed came from Tromix Corp., which is advertising a .50-caliber ``Turban Chaser'' rifle on its site.

The gun-maker Beretta is offering a ``United We Stand'' 9-millimeter pistol, similar to the sidearm U.S. soldiers have carried since 1985. A limited edition sold out in a day, spokesman Jeff Leh said.

The Italian gun maker, which has its American headquarters in Accokeek, Md., donated $100,000 to relatives of the victims of the attacks in New York and at the Pentagon (news - web sites) from sales of the limited edition. It is sending another $50 for each additional United We Stand gun it sells.

Leh said the company's marketing link to the terror attacks is based on its customers' patriotism and the jump in demand.

Gun control groups ``seem to be ignoring the fact that the right of self defense is the very right that this country is exercising right now,'' Leh said.

Aron criticized the link between gun sales and donations. ``We shouldn't seek to help the victims of one senseless tragedy by increasing the likelihood of more senseless tragedies,'' Aron said.

Gun makers, dealers and FBI (news - web sites) statistics all indicate that more Americans have been buying guns since the attacks. Attendance is up at National Rifle Association gun safety classes, NRA spokeswoman Trish Gregory said.

The alliance has put up 135 billboards in the Los Angeles area warning about the dangers of guns in the home, partly to respond to the 300 billboards the California Rifle and Pistol Association put up in October.

A ``pop quiz'' on the alliance billboards asserts that guns bought for self-defense lead to more domestic violence, suicides and accidental shootings.

``This campaign is a direct reaction to the gun industry's effort to boost gun sales in the wake of September 11,'' Aron said.

The California gun group's billboards carried the message, ``Society is safer when criminals don't know who's armed.'' The campaign was conceived and paid for before Sept. 11, said Chuck Michel, the association's spokesman.

But the message was even more relevant following the attacks, Michel said.

``I don't feel the slightest bit guilty about making people think about one of the tools that's available to ... respond to certain threats - threats that were every bit as real before Sept. 11, but threats people are much more aware of since Sept. 11,'' he said.

-

On the Net:

Alliance for Justice: http://www.afj.org

National Rifle Association: http://www.nra.org


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 12/07/2001 6:36:34 AM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JeanS
If I were the gun manufacturers I would just blow the Gun Control Groups off and ignore them. Once the Gun Control groups are ignored and the public sees that, it will perfectly okay for the public to blow them off also. Out of site = out of mind.
2 posted on 12/07/2001 6:40:34 AM PST by samuel_adams_us
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS; *bang_list
Bang
3 posted on 12/07/2001 6:50:42 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Rep. Carolyn McCarthy

A truly evil woman who represents my childhood congressional district. She cashed in on her husband's murder on the LIRR by going on commercials supporting Mario Cuomo (remember New York?:"I am a Republican, but only Cuomo cares about getting guns off the street"). She then registers as a Dem and defeats Dan Frisa by about 12 points. Nobody ever get rich betting on the political intelligence of New Yorkers.

4 posted on 12/07/2001 6:51:27 AM PST by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Great - the gun control groups trying to exploit the attack to advance their agenda are bitterly criticizing the gun manufacturers for trying to exploit the attack to advance their sales. Pot, meet kettle - black.
5 posted on 12/07/2001 6:55:32 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
I saw an outstanding bumper sticker in a magazine yesterday. It said:

"Ted Kennedy's Driving has KILLED more people than MY GUN!"

I thought it was great!

6 posted on 12/07/2001 7:00:17 AM PST by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
This is not about gun control. These wackos want to control the guns you purchase whether you're law-abiding or not. It's BS them saying they don't want criminals getting them. They know criminals can get them now illegally or stealing them from relatives or strangers. Look at Columbine. I believe one of the boys got their weapon by stealing it from their grandpa. Remember the first murder was committed by Cain who killed his brother Abel. There were no guns back then.
7 posted on 12/07/2001 7:02:07 AM PST by IRBlondie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

8 posted on 12/07/2001 7:04:25 AM PST by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IRBlondie
If those Socialist Democrats don't want to own guns, then they don't have to, but leave mine the hell alone. Ted Kennedy's nephew is going on trial soon for killing Martha Moxley with a golf club. Why doesn't he concentrate on golf club control. Has anyone heard anything about plane control since 9-11? If these gun control jackasses weren't so dangerous, they would be funny.
9 posted on 12/07/2001 7:11:11 AM PST by MotherSpector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: samuel_adams_us
Gun control advocates accuse the firearms industry of trying to profit from tragedy.

If a company makes something that is useful in time of need, why is it shameful if they profit from it?

10 posted on 12/07/2001 7:25:13 AM PST by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Great - the gun control groups trying to exploit the attack to advance their agenda are bitterly criticizing the gun manufacturers for trying to exploit the attack to advance their sales. Pot, meet kettle - black.

I think you've overlooked one factor here. The anti-gun groups are trying to take advantage of 9/11 to advance a cause that is fundamentally unrelated to the event - a cynical and dishonest endeavor. The firearms companies are using the event to appeal to people who feel they need more security by offering a product which actually will make them more secure - free enterprise at work (although I admit the link to national security is a little weak). The two are NOT the same.

11 posted on 12/07/2001 7:29:58 AM PST by Still Thinking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Tromix Corp., which is advertising a .50-caliber ``Turban Chaser'' rifle on its site.

heh heh good one! "Turban Chaser..." Nice mental image.

12 posted on 12/07/2001 7:30:55 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
A truly evil woman who represents my childhood congressional district. She cashed in on her husband's murder on the LIRR by going on commercials supporting Mario Cuomo (remember New York?:"I am a Republican, but only Cuomo cares about getting guns off the street"). She then registers as a Dem and defeats Dan Frisa by about 12 points

I remember her. One of her (phony) campaign promises was that the only reason why she ran on the Demo ticket was because of the gun issue. In her heart and mind (according to her), she was still a Republican on all other issues.

Of course only weeks later I watched her trash the Republican stance on the Medicaid and social security issues, using the DemocRAT talking points (read: propaganda) exactly word for word.

13 posted on 12/07/2001 7:31:21 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
A truly evil woman who represents my childhood congressional district. She cashed in on her husband's murder on the LIRR by going on commercials supporting Mario Cuomo (remember New York?:"I am a Republican, but only Cuomo cares about getting guns off the street"). She then registers as a Dem and defeats Dan Frisa by about 12 points

PS: Dan Frisa wasn't too smart. In fact he was a coward when it came to debating McCarthy.

McCarthy got off her campaign in March, I believe it was. Frisa waited untill the very last two months to start his campaign (if you can call it that) in September! And even when they had a televised debate scheduled, he would fail to show up (he did this more than once), turning the debate into an interview, leaving McCarthy with alot of free air time, unopposed.

14 posted on 12/07/2001 7:36:52 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Still Thinking
If a company makes something that is useful in time of need, why is it shameful if they profit from it?

How true.

But, since McCarthy and her friends object to the companies making a profit........

maybe the gunmakers should try to make them happy by offering 76 guns to the public at severely reduced prices.

I wonder how McCarthy would react to the gun companies' offer to cut into their own profits. Does anyone here think an offer like that would make McCarthy happier?

15 posted on 12/07/2001 7:38:44 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
maybe the gunmakers should try to make them happy by offering 76 guns to the public at severely reduced prices.

The companies could try variations on this theme. For example, they could use some contest to determine who wins one of 76 discount coupons.

16 posted on 12/07/2001 7:46:24 AM PST by syriacus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"statistics all indicate that more Americans have been buying guns since the attacks".

And why not? Sounds like common sense to me.

17 posted on 12/07/2001 7:47:15 AM PST by XA-3Whaler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Gun control advocates accuse the firearms industry of trying to profit from tragedy.

Anyone remember that televised concert that was supposed to raise money for the victims of 9/11? The gun control advocates got a cut of that. (It was intended to be a full fledged fundraiser for gun control, BUT 9/11 happened and they turned it into a fundraiser for the 9/11 victims, but still the gun control advocates took a cut for themselves.)

The NRA on the other hand shut down the links on their website thatwas supposed to lead to their donation and membership pages.

A ``pop quiz'' on the alliance billboards asserts that guns bought for self-defense lead to more domestic violence, suicides and accidental shootings.

STILL with the lies. They'll never change.

18 posted on 12/07/2001 7:48:50 AM PST by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
``Turban Chaser''

LOL

19 posted on 12/07/2001 7:49:06 AM PST by Ragin1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"Gun control advocates accuse the firearms industry of trying to profit from tragedy."

PLANES are crashed by terrorists into buildings killing thousands of innocent Americans. Not a single gun was used. But ask Sarah Brady and HCI if they used the incidents as part of their fundraiser.

20 posted on 12/07/2001 7:59:31 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson