Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Technology aims to assist tomorrow's infantryman without adding to his burden (many pics)
Jane's Personal Combat Equipment ^ | 12/10/2001 | Alexander Stilwell

Posted on 12/11/2001 12:45:48 PM PST by Pokey78

The good news is that significant resources are available to improve Dismounted Close Combat and that various national programmes are well underway; the bad news is that the soldier on the ground is increasingly overburdened with clothing and individual equipment.

This was the message from the third International Soldier Systems Conference, held in the Assembly Rooms in Bath and at the School of Infantry in Warminster in the last week of November.

The aim of the conference, according to its organisers, the Defence Manufacturer's Association, was to "provide a forum for all those involved with soldier systems and their integration, with the aim of making the allied soldier the best equipped, best clothed and best protected in the world".

To this end, a host of papers were presented by delegates from countries as varied as Canada, Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa as well as, of course, the United States and the United Kingdom. The subject matter ranged from national programme overviews to the optimum properties of the combat glove.

Despite the advances in smart munitions and the ability to drop them from relatively safe distances, the time always comes, as it has in Afghanistan, for the infantryman to move in and take ground.

In the same way that technological overmatch has been achieved in many aspects of larger hardware, the aim now is to achieve similar overmatch with regard to individual infantry capabilities.

The danger, as identified by Brigadier Ian Rodley in the conference opening address, is that the infantryman will not only be overburdened with equipment but with information as well. Technology must therefore fight for its place and prove its worth.

Difficulties aside, the prospects are exciting and there is plenty of evidence that they are being realised. Head-up display technology similar to that used by fighter pilots is being designed for the Objective Force Warrior, according to Phil Brandler of US Army Soldier Biological and Chemical Command (SBCCOM). There was also, however, plenty of evidence from the UK FIST and US Land Warrior programmes that the early display technology is up and running and that it works, improving the ability of the infantryman and infantry section to move, find and engage while also increasing survivability.

As Lieutenant-Colonel Cynthia Bedell of the US Project Manager Soldier pointed out, only 37 per cent of the soldier's weight is taken up by weapons and electronics, while 63 per cent of the weight comes from clothing and individual equipment.

Several papers addressed the questions of how to maintain mission effectiveness while dealing with the routine or potential hazards of cold weather, fragmentation or nuclear, biological and chemical warfare. According to Sergeant Robert J Ehrlich of the US Joint Readiness Training Center at Fort Polk, the problems of the overburdened soldier, with a platoon average of 91 lbs (41.3kg), are magnified in cold weather with an average increase of 13.2 lbs (5.3kg) of extra cold weather gear. Svein Martini of the Norwegian Defence and Research Establishment discussed the difficulties of providing sufficient thermal protection as well as ventilation in wet and cold environments, with the problems for the soldier ranging from cold stress when immobile to heat stress when active.

Body armour is another potential life-saving device but also has obvious weight and heat stress problems. Papers examined the unlikely potential for a whole-body 'suit of armour' and raised the question as to whether money would be better invested in camouflage research rather than body armour, the idea being that if you are not seen you will not get hit.

With regard to NBC protection, advances have been made at SBBCOM in conjunction with consultants such as Texplorer GmbH in the development of selectively permeable membrane technologies. These allow protective dress that is lighter than the current standard overgarment, provide comparable protection and allow a degree of moisture vapour evaporation through the clothing.

The conference closed with a visit from the Minister of Defence Procurement, Lord Bach of Lutterworth. He joined the rest of the delegates for a lunch of MRE (Meals Ready to Eat) rations provided by US Army SBCCOM.

Latest upgrade of the UK's FIST 2 C4I conceptual equipment programme, currently under trial with the Army Infantry Trials and Development Unit in partnership with QinetiQ.
Latest prototype of the Joint Services General Purpose Mask (JSGPM), which is beginning trials with the US DoD as the new NBC M50 mask, replacing the current US military M40 respirator/mask.
US Army Operational Forces Interface Group vision of a Land Warrior System, part of the Objective Force Warrior Notional Concept.
US Army Operational Forces Interface Group vision of a Land Warrior System concept, due in service by 2004/6 under the Objective Force Warrior programme.
US Army Operational Forces Interface Group vision of a Land Warrior System concept, due in service by 2004/6 under the Objective Force Warrior programme.
Biosensor unit in a briefcase seen at the US Land Warrior Exhibition at the DMA International Soldier Systems Conference & Exhibition, Warminster, UK.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2001 12:45:48 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; Squantos; harpseal; SLB; sneakypete; Poohbah; B4Ranch
bttt
2 posted on 12/11/2001 1:00:35 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Very nice. However, in a climate like Florida, anyone wearing and carrying all this junk would be rendered combat ineffective from heat exhaustion in short order.
3 posted on 12/11/2001 1:01:55 PM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

"I have you now, Luke Skywalker !!"
4 posted on 12/11/2001 1:03:15 PM PST by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower; Travis McGee
As power systems get smaller, and computer systems more able to cope with the complexity of human movement (standing erect and walking is about the most difficult means of locomotion in existence), you will eventually see powered exoskeletons to help the infantryman move all this gear, keep an appropriate body temperature regardless of climate, and protect him from bugs and gas.

Starship Troopers, here we come!

5 posted on 12/11/2001 1:22:18 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SLB; Jeff Head; sit-rep
Neat toys, but will they work?
6 posted on 12/11/2001 1:24:08 PM PST by pocat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanchmo
Luke, I am your faaaaaaaaaatherrrrrrrrrrr...
7 posted on 12/11/2001 1:24:31 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; SLB
I wonder if anyone is developing air droppable "pods" like in Starship Troopers to safely drop troops from high altitude without all the specialized training?

Each could be aimed by GPS to open at the same altitude and land in formation. The pod would contain pressurized air etc.

8 posted on 12/11/2001 2:36:45 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
You'd still need a trained trooper to fly the "last mile" through point defenses.
9 posted on 12/11/2001 2:46:55 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I don't know, you could make them out of kevlar/carbon fiber, and have the chute deploy 300 feet above the ground.
10 posted on 12/11/2001 2:56:18 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
300 feet without training in a PLF?

Ouch, that's GOTTA hurt!

11 posted on 12/11/2001 2:57:36 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
"300 feet without training in a PLF? Ouch, that's GOTTA hurt!"

Training/Schmaining- your first jumps always end with SOS (sack of s...) landings!

12 posted on 12/11/2001 4:08:08 PM PST by fourdeuce82d
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
You would want to put some kind of stabilization on them to keep the right attitude during free-fall, make them from stealth materials so they would have a small radar cross-section, and have the capability for extremely high HAHO type opening. Then you would have the problem of quick and unobserved destruction on the "drop-zone".

Also, two personnel in one box makes more sense than one. If a capsule comes down separated from the group because of a malfunction or such you would want at least two personnel together.

Alternatively, assuming these are for special ops type troops (better, longer training cycle) you could make them so that they glide into a landing. Something like small lifting bodies. The ability to "fly" into a target area in a high-altitude launched glider could have interesting applications.

Hey, if you're gonna dream, dream BIG!!!

Take care,

Ruck

13 posted on 12/11/2001 4:30:34 PM PST by Have Ruck - Will Travel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
These guys deserve some Stepford Wives, too! Really hot chicks, after a hard day, at the test rage.
14 posted on 12/11/2001 4:32:09 PM PST by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Compare


15 posted on 12/11/2001 7:30:05 PM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Does a pin stripe combat fatigue go with that brief case???
16 posted on 12/11/2001 7:43:05 PM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
As Lieutenant-Colonel Cynthia Bedell of the US Project Manager Soldier pointed out, only 37 per cent of the soldier's weight is taken up by weapons and electronics, while 63 per cent of the weight comes from clothing and individual equipment.

Does this ring anyone else's BS meter? 37% for weapons? What in the h%ll is "individual equipment"? Mess kit? toothpaste? Any help understanding this is appreciated.

17 posted on 12/11/2001 8:25:10 PM PST by lafroste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Have Ruck - Will Travel; Poohbah
All good points on "13, and all "do-able" IMHO.

Now let's apply for a grant.

18 posted on 12/11/2001 9:07:57 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: arielb
Ha! Too good.
19 posted on 12/11/2001 9:15:05 PM PST by Hamza01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
Re your landing pods. If one added in a parasail type chute and a small power source the delivery system could also carry a whole lot more equipment and land on a dime. Computerized controls for the parasail would give even better results. The entire thing could be built having almost no radar or heat signiture.

Even squad sized delivery systems would work using this priciple.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Merry Christmas - Yorktown

20 posted on 12/12/2001 5:53:05 AM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson