Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Is Bush Hiding?
Toogood Reports ^ | December 16, 2001 | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 12/15/2001 1:16:52 PM PST by Starmaker

During the election season last year, I warned my listeners and readers that should G. W. Bush get elected, he would never allow Congress or the American people learn the truth about Bill Clinton's copious acts of criminality. In other words, Bush would continue where Janet Reno left off: there would be more stonewalling and cover-ups. This prediction brought the ire and angst against me by Bush-backers. We now know I was right, although I do not expect the Bush people to be willing to admit it.

News reports yesterday said, "President Bush invoked executive privilege for the first time Thursday to keep Congress from seeing documents of prosecutor 's decision-making [regarding] the Clinton-era fund-raising probe." Bush said, "Congressional access to these documents would be contrary to the national interest." Translated: "Congressional access to these documents would be contrary to my interest."

Bush's decision to cover-up the truth about Clinton's criminality makes him culpable to that criminality. It also means that there is no closure to the blight of eight years of corruption and degradation in the White House. Add Bush's cover-up to the long list of injustices left unaccounted for such as Ruby Ridge, Waco and now Chinagate. The question must be asked: what is Bush trying to hide?

Could it be that if Congress uncovers foreign influence within the Clinton administration, it would also uncover foreign influence within the Bush administration? The Boston Herald recently reported that billion-dollar arms and oil deals with the Saudi monarchy "have served or currently serve at the highest levels of U.S. government."

The Herald goes on to say, "Nowhere is the revolving U.S.-Saudi money wheel more evident than within President Bush's own coterie of foreign policy advisers, starting with the president's father, George H.W. Bush."

The report further states, "At the same time that the elder Bush counsels his son on the ongoing war on terrorism, the former president remains a senior adviser to the Washington, D.C.-based Carlyle Group. That influential investment bank has deep connections to the Saudi royal family as well as financial interests in U.S. defense firms hired by the kingdom to equip and train the Saudi army."

This more-than-casual connection between Bush and the Saudi monarchy is causing U.S. policy makers to turn a blind eye to things that would otherwise "cause our blood to boil," because no one wants to "stop the gravy train." (Remember that the vast majority of the September 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.)

People mentioned in the Herald report as participating in ongoing covert, international influence peddling include "former U.S. officials, former presidents, aides to the current president .people who are the pillars of American society and officialdom."

That Bush is hiding much seems obvious. What exactly is he hiding? Maybe we do not want to know - and it looks like we never will.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-315 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2001 1:16:52 PM PST by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
"I warned my listeners and readers that should G. W. Bush get elected, he would never allow Congress or the American people learn the truth about Bill Clinton's copious acts of criminality. In other words, Bush would continue where Janet Reno left off: there would be more stonewalling and cover-ups." See how jr. and Ashcroft shot THAT contentention down by releasing ........ ah...........then................ummm..........

Well!!!! Just give them some more time!!!!! There's a masterful, crafty, supersmart PLAN invoved here. Just give them some more time.

Then we'll know EVERYTHING we paid our government to find out about Mena, an China Treason an stuff!

made me sick to even type that.

2 posted on 12/15/2001 1:26:03 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
The invocation of privilege covers both the Clinton era and that of his father. All sorts of matters could be "protected."
3 posted on 12/15/2001 1:26:53 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
News reports yesterday said, "President Bush invoked executive privilege for the first time Thursday to keep Congress from seeing documents of prosecutor 's decision-making [regarding] the Clinton-era fund-raising probe."

These are not the only documents from which Bush shielded the deliberations of Justice Department prosecutors (the actual reason the documents were withheld).

But, of course, ole Chuckie doesn't tell you that. He would have you believe Bush is specifically covering up for Clinton.

Chuck is being disingenuous, something that's becoming a habit for him.

The report further states, "At the same time that the elder Bush counsels his son on the ongoing war on terrorism, the former president remains a senior adviser to the Washington, D.C.-based Carlyle Group. That influential investment bank has deep connections to the Saudi royal family as well as financial interests in U.S. defense firms hired by the kingdom to equip and train the Saudi army."

What the Saudi connection has to do with executive privilege is not, of course, explained by Chuckie. He just throws it out there, then inserts his own editorial opinion:

(Remember that the vast majority of the September 11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia.)

That's it! Bush is in cohoots with the terrorists who killed 3,000 people!!

Why anyone on this website believes this goofy conspiracy theorist is beyond me.

4 posted on 12/15/2001 1:28:42 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
We CAN stand the truth!
5 posted on 12/15/2001 1:29:37 PM PST by Marianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
I warned my listeners and readers that should G. W. Bush get elected, he would never allow Congress or the American people learn the truth about Bill Clinton's copious acts of criminality.

Yup, Gore would have revealed it all........... LOL

6 posted on 12/15/2001 1:31:50 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Marianne
Here's a blanket "truth" that's ignored ---

"The Herald goes on to say, "Nowhere is the revolving U.S.-Saudi money wheel more evident than within President Bush's own coterie of foreign policy advisers, starting with the president's father, George H.W. Bush."

7 posted on 12/15/2001 1:35:22 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
"Yup, Gore would have revealed it all........... LOL"

I don't believe that was stated or inferred. The real problem goes back to the entire controlled "nomination" <------- don't know a funnier word to use there, of jr.

8 posted on 12/15/2001 1:38:32 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
I've read almost those exact words typed many times by many people on Free Republic. And I confess, I was naive enough to expect some change, perhaps small change, but some change for the better. Am I allowed to lament the lack of change here? Pardon my political incorrectness, but it seems that although there's a new president in office, the government is the same.
9 posted on 12/15/2001 1:41:17 PM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
I don't think anyone with half a mind ever thought for one instant that Gore would clean up the Clinton crime family's messes and reveal the truth. But some of us hoped that Bush would. We're still waiting. I would never have voted for Gore, but I'm starting to wonder if voting for anyone is worth the effort if everyone's going to be the same in the first place. Am I disillusioned? You bet.
10 posted on 12/15/2001 1:44:16 PM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rdavis84
The real problem goes back to the entire controlled "nomination"

No one else in the GOP would have won. Simple as that. I thank God for Dubya everyday!

11 posted on 12/15/2001 1:44:38 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: golitely
Am I disillusioned? You bet.

You're also swallowing all the swill from the rdavis84's and Inspector Harry Callahans that Bush is trying to cover something up.

Bush gave an explanation you obviously don't accept.

You'd rather believe the conspiracists.

12 posted on 12/15/2001 1:48:25 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
During the election season last year, I warned my listeners and readers that should G. W. Bush get elected, he would never allow Congress or the American people learn the truth about Bill Clinton's copious acts of criminality.

First of all, the American people had their chance to throw Bill Clinton out of office: twice. What makes this joker think the American people even care about Clinton's criminality? Answer: They don't. And Bush isn't going after Clinton because he knows he'd be mired down so much in political bickering with the Democrats that he wouldn't accomplish any of his objectives. You want to talk about gridlock? Just imagine what it would be like if Bush had crucified Clinton. We'd be hearing all of this crap from the DNC about how Bush and the GOP are going on a "mean-spirited witchhunt" (yeah, I love that one coming from the DNC--boggles the mind) -- and regardless of how it would be defended on principle, a certain amount of the public would go along with the DNC. They'd be saying stuff like, "The guy's served his country. Let's let bygones be bygones, etc, etc"
13 posted on 12/15/2001 1:48:31 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: golitely
It HAS gone a little "retro" :-)---

FROM------  http://www.bostonherald.com/news/americas_new_war/saud12112001.htm

Insiders trading

A significant portion of the millions of dollars U.S. companies and their politically influential executives have earned in deals with the Saudis has been through military contracts.

The Carlyle Group had a major stake in the large defense contractor B.D.M., which has multimillion-dollar contracts through its subsidiaries to train and manage the Saudi National Guard and the Saudi air force, U.S. Department of Defense records show. In 1998, Carlyle sold its controlling interest in B.D.M. to defense giant TRW International.

Meanwhile, the boards of directors of the Carlyle Group, B.D.M. and TRW are all stocked with high-level Republican policy makers.

Frank C. Carlucci, a former secretary of defense under President Reagan, was chairman of B.D.M. for most of the 1990s. Carlucci, who also served as Reagan's national security adviser and a deputy director of the CIA, now heads the Carlyle Group.

Along with former President Bush, other officials from past Republican administrations now at the Carlyle Group include: former Secretary of State James A. Baker III; ex-budget chief Richard Darman; and former Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Arthur Levitt.

President Bush is himself linked to the Carlyle group: He was a director of one of its subsidiaries, an airline food services company called Caterair, until 1994. Six years later, when Bush was governor of Texas, the board of directors of the Texas teachers' pension fund - some of whom were his appointees - voted to invest $100 million with the Carlyle Group.

The president of B.D.M. is Philip A. Odeen, a former high-level Pentagon official in the Nixon administration. During the Clinton administration, Odeen chaired the Pentagon task force that planned the restructuring of the U.S. military for the 21st century. Currently, he is the vice-chair of the Defense Science Board, which advises the Pentagon on emerging threats.

TRW, the new owner of B.D.M., has its own noteworthy board members, including former CIA director Robert M. Gates and Michael H. Armacost, who served as undersecretary of state under President Reagan and as ambassador to Japan for former President Bush.

Big Saudi money also makes its way back to Texas and the Bush family. The family of Saudi Arabia's longtime U.S. ambassador, Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, gave $1 million to the Bush Presidential Library in College Station, Texas.

14 posted on 12/15/2001 1:50:20 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
Bush's decision to cover-up the truth about Clinton's criminality makes him culpable to that criminality.

Have to agree here. Seems that's the same as a country that harbors terrorists being the in league with the terrorists.

15 posted on 12/15/2001 1:57:05 PM PST by The Truth Will Make You Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texaggie79
"Yup, Gore would have revealed it all........... LOL"

One doesn't have to be a "Gore-on" to wonder what is going on here.

Blind loyalty to a political party or politician does not serve the country's best interest.

"In questions of power...let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."
--Thomas Jefferson: Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.

"Confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism. Free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence."
--Thomas Jefferson: Draft, Kentucky Resolutions, 1798.

16 posted on 12/15/2001 1:59:24 PM PST by KeyBored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Why anyone on this website believes this goofy conspiracy theorist is beyond me.

Actually, a lot of us don't.

To some people, the world is one huge, never-ending conspiracy. They give themselves affirmation in believing that; (a) Everyone is evil and (b) Only they are smart enough to know the real truth. Everyone else is naive, a dupe or just plain dumb. Not them. No siree Bob!
They just know Bush is in cahoots with the evil men that secretly run the world, while us dolts and dupes live our lives in blissful ignorance about the reality they 'know' exists. Guys like Chuck Baldwin and many others make a very nice living off these people. They get columns, write books and have radio shows that feed the delusion. It pays well and it's so easy.

Do wealthy, powerful people have a lot of influence in the world? Of course. Always have - always will. Big deal. It's this 'web of intrigue' that fascinates the True Believers. The concept that a handful of people all conspire together to 'run the world'. Think James Bond and 'Doctor No'.

It's a little sad but these folks will always be around and the Chuck Baldwins of the world will always be there to feed off the latent paranoia and fear that drives this kind of thinking. President Bush is just the latest powerful man to get the 'part of the plot' treatment. The Chuck Baldwins feast off it. Since the Bush family has some Mid-East ties, the current situation is red meat for the conspiracy fans. The Bush-haters get a free shot, too.

Fortunately, not all FReepers are part of the conspiracy web-ring and can see people and events as they are, not as we might fantasize them. Meanwhile, Chuck Baldwin and the others that feed the conspiracy theory folks just keeps laughing, all the way to the bank.

17 posted on 12/15/2001 2:00:30 PM PST by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
What if the Chinese gave Slick a Million $ towards his Liebrary? Would that be O.K.?

"Big Saudi money also makes its way back to Texas and the Bush family. The family of Saudi Arabia's longtime U.S. ambassador, Prince Bandar bin Sultan bin Abdul Aziz, gave $1 million to the Bush Presidential Library in College Station, Texas."

18 posted on 12/15/2001 2:02:09 PM PST by rdavis84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
"What exactly is he hiding?"

A 14" schlong, Farley!

19 posted on 12/15/2001 2:02:15 PM PST by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starmaker
What Is Bush Hiding?

Larry Flynt strikes again.

20 posted on 12/15/2001 2:03:16 PM PST by boothead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson