Posted on 12/16/2001 6:36:44 PM PST by Lizavetta
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:49:47 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Sandy Manca of Naperville, mother of book-loving 17-year-old Nora, once did the unthinkable: She discouraged her child from reading. After Manca and her husband decided to home-school Nora, who was 10 at the time, Nora's response was, "Now I'll finally have time to read!" Sandy Manca recalled. "We let her read as much as she wanted until we finally had to make her take breaks to get things done."
(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...
"The socialization process is important to a child's maturation. A good setting--in school--interacting with children and adults with varying views is very important to the education of a child," he said.
I think we all know what the educrat is trying to say, don't we? Feel free to add your own translation.
I laughed when I read this. Last night I took my granddaughter to a company Christmas party...after everyone else had left she and I stayed and played cards with four other people. That was my 9 yr old and five adults over 40....and she fit right in....:) and won her share of the hands too..!!
Perhaps I'm grasping here, but would you say that the same people who criticize homeschooling as the domain of the privileged (two parent households with stay-at-home mom) would be the first to tell you that any loving group situation is a FAMILY and JUST AS GOOD as a traditional one?
The old "socialization" argument. Total crap. What I learned in high school concerning socialization took a while to unlearn once I entered the real world.
"The socialization process is important to a worker's brainwashing. A good setting -- in school -- teaching them to only listen to state-approved authority figures, to move from subject to subject when the bell rings, that nothing is worth doing that can't be interrupted by a schedule, that being beat up is a rite of passage, that drugs and crime aren't bad enough to force the removal of criminals from the classroom, that there are few consequences for actions, that individual thought isn't allowed in real life, that what you wear on your shirt is subjectively criticized if it offends the state, that self-defense is not necessarily a basic human right, that being straight is only politically correct if you are sleeping around with the right number of people, that interacting with children and adults with varying views -- other than conservative -- is very important to the moulding of a sheeple.
I am proud of and grateful to their parents who are so selflessly seeing to it that these children are brought up in an atmosphere where truth can be the touchstone, devoid of the malinfluence of peer pressure and of liberal ideology.
Oh you homeschool? How do they get adequate socialization?
I hate that word, I hear it everywhere I go with my kids as if the questioner even knows what it means. I never hear any other word or phrase, it's eerie. I don't hear, Do they get along with other kids? or How do you prepare them for the real world? (which is a laugher, especially considering the pubelick skewel product), it's always "socialization." What an obviously successful piece of educrat propaganda that is!
Translation: Socialization makes good socialists.
Here is what I do in response, I have the nine-year old explain how Dickens modeled his own life history in segments of his books, or factor a quadratic in her head, or I have the seven-year-old multiply a few algebraic binomials, name three cities on the Danube that start with the letter "B," or I'll have a technical discussion with them about whatever is handy, usually on a high-school level...
Heheheh
You should see that glare of unbridled hate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.