Fulton County Georgia Ballot Inspection Hearing Subverted – Georgia Stalling to Prevent Forensic Review of Suspected Fraudulent Absentee Ballots

Gateway Pundit ^ | 01/04/2021 | Joe Hoft

[lepton]

It is believed that the attempt to move the case was because Fulton County does not have all the ballots to inspect. Once inspected, thousands of fraudulent ballots are expected to be uncovered.

---

Part of the audit should be whether the ballots even actually exist, even with two months to manufacture them.

[Fury]

Hoft gets something right.

RedState is also reporting on this.

[lepton]

In his phone call, Trump was especially interested in signature verification in Fulton County.

---

It was always primarily Fulton County, hence the national eye-rolling when the SoS went and did the farce verification on Cobb County instead.

[rollo tomasi]

The scenario that would likely be truthful/you wish for would of went like this:

State Legislature as a majority would have challenged the election (Did not happen)

State legislature as a majority would not have accepted certification (Did not happen)

State legislature as a majority would have refused Biden's electors from voting on December 14th (Did not happen)

State legislatures as a majority would have sent their own electors (Did not happen)

So why the heck are you saying the governor is in control? There is no Constitutional mandate for that, but with State Legislatures its a different story.

[FreeReign]

Yes, the Legislature allowed those electors in to do their business based on the Legislature's permission (Biden's electors in this election).

Trump's GA electors were also allowed into the building to vote. I believe out of the five states, only the Michigan electors didn't get into their state building.

But of course getting into the building doesn't mean that you were chosen by the legislators.

Please read Georgia State law and Article II Section 1 clause 2 and 3.

I'm familiar with Article II. Georgia law does not supersede the US Constitution.

[Hootowl99]

The GA legislature did not send Biden electors. The Secretary of State did.

[rollo tomasi]

Trump's GA electors were also allowed into the building to vote.

Because of a pending lawsuits, not objections. Hawaii did the same darn thing in 1960.

[rollo tomasi]

No, the SOS certified the vote. Legislature appointed the electors in their own manner of choosing without objection.

[FreeReign]

Document the GA legislature voting to pick the slate of electors.

They never did.

[rollo tomasi]

Georgia law does not supersede the US Constitution.



Article II section 1 clause 2 gives the State Legislatures the power to choose/appoint the electors in their own manner/direction. The US Congress has the power to intervene at times as well concerning regs during Federal elections.

Where on earth is the Governor or SOS involved besides executing the laws that the State legislatures set?

[rollo tomasi]

ON November 3, lol.

The State Legislature affirmed that election on December 14th by allowing the slate of electors to vote. They gave a courtesy vote to Repub electors due to lawsuits.

Do you know how the process works?

Come on, they allowed two set of electors, one due to potential lawsuits.

Who allowed Repub electors? Hope you answer that one because it's the same body that allowed dem electors.

[FreeReign]

Who allowed Repub electors? Hope you answer that one because it's the same body that allowed dem electors.

The "body" didn't vote to allow them into the building.

There are over 200 Senators and Representatives in the GA Assembly. Didn't I ask you to document that vote??

You never did.

Document it.

[b4me]

are you saying GA legislature did not vote for either set of electors - since they aloowed 2 sets in to building? then how could they have sent just one set (biden electors) as some say?

[FreeReign]

are you saying GA legislature did not vote for either set of electors - since they aloowed 2 sets in to building? then how could they have sent just one set (biden electors) as some say?

Yup. If (somebody) simply letting them into the building means that the full Assembly supports the electors, and if both sets of electors were let into the building, then how could some say that only one of the electors is supported.

[Hootowl99]

I see your qualification and technically you’re correct. The legislature can be called into special session by call of the governor, which the wimp will not do, or 3/5 vote of the House and Senate. My information is that the House R leader told senators that he could round up his side of the 3/5. The R Senate leader has blocked the Senate from getting to the 3/5 number. My understanding is that Senators have sent a formal letter (judiciary committee I think) stating to the effect that the election is in dispute and the SOS certification is not valid.

There’s a lot going on my friend. It’s difficult to keep up in GA with all our twists and turns. Our SOS is a slimy, lying POS. Our governor is hiding in the basement over something. My opinions....

For sure though, there are a lot of R politicians that have seen the end of their careers over this mess. The R leader of the Senate represents 3 counties in north GA, very conservative, and is likely a goner next election. My R Senator is tied in with the Senate leader and is up for election in 2 years and proving to be a squish. I look forward to voting her out. I’ve been bombarding R legislators with emails recommending impeachment’s of our Gov, Lt. Gov, SOS and AG. All are complicit in the fraud.

[rollo tomasi]

State law that the State Legislature wrote dictates the appointment of electors is through a majority of the vote which include the gov. signing off on the appointment of the electors that the State Legislature wrote in the first place.

That is the manner chosen, although I like your manner better (Direct appointment but that is a different topic) starts and ends with the legislature. That is the power given to that body.

Point is that is how most the State Legislature choose their electors (Couple States EC votes can be split).
If there are issues they can appoint their own slate but for the most part are beholden to the laws that are written by that body which include the governor's sig/execution of the law the legislature wrote and signed off on.

[Starboard]

There are a million excuses to vote for the lesser of two evils. None of them are valid.

************

I agree. In this case the lesser evil deceives us into thinking they will do something they won’t. I don’t like being misled and lied to. Their lying compounds the distrust and resentment.

[1Old Pro]

just terrible, elected officials are dumb cowards.

[Svartalfiar]

Where on earth is the Governor or SOS involved besides executing the laws that the State legislatures set?

3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress includes this part: But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted.

[rollo tomasi]

Where is the safe harbor in this case?
There is none because the State legislature allowed the process to take place without objection, (Read the whole after what you cited instead of cherry picking) lol.

Fly in the US code’s ointment you cited was in 2000. The section you convienently forgot to cite would have been activated/come into play due to the safe harbor protections State Legislature (Florida in that case) posess if the situation goes to hades. Planetary powers and all that.