Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New blow for dinosaur-killing asteroid theory
National Science Foundation ^ | Apr. 27, 2009 | Unknown

Posted on 04/27/2009 12:33:23 PM PDT by decimon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Secret Agent Man
What? You mean all the theses and fellowships and studies done about all this are now worth dog poop? I’d hate to be in a field that you do your life’s work in, and put forth all these theories and hypotheses, and then go about defending them staunchly against anyone who says different, and then find out later it was all wrong.

That's the beauty of science.

The "Dinos were killed by asteroid hypothesis" was very shakey to begin with.

An asteroid came out of the sky and killed all the dinosaurs but somehow left other things like Alligators, Parrots, honeybee, tropical frogs, sea turtles and many other temperature sensitive animals that you would expect to be the 1st to go, seemingly unaffected should have at least had people scratching their heads.

The good news is this hurts liberals more, the only reason this hypothesis got as far as it did was because of it's anti-nuclear weapon implications(Well and the coolness factor)

21 posted on 04/27/2009 1:17:20 PM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I knew it, I knew it...Dinosaurs were living 6000 years ago!


22 posted on 04/27/2009 1:17:38 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Keller suggests that the massive volcanic eruptions at the Deccan Traps in India may be responsible for the extinction, releasing huge amounts of dust and gases that could have blocked out sunlight and brought about a significant greenhouse effect.

There have been some speculations that the shockwave propagating from the Chicxulub impact may have triggered volcanic eruptions on the other side of the world in India

23 posted on 04/27/2009 1:23:25 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money -- Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

Something did go extinct, the asteroid predictors who were wrong.


24 posted on 04/27/2009 1:29:31 PM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: decimon
...no other large craters are known to have caused a significant extinction event.

No significant extinction events known to have been caused by other large craters? Interesting. Still, it's probably a good idea to keep a wary eye on those large craters...they could turn into killers at any moment.

25 posted on 04/27/2009 1:40:51 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

This researcher has been on a crusade to disprove the asteroid impact theory and won’t share her evidence when asked so this should be viewed as a personal vendetta or something of the like.


26 posted on 04/27/2009 1:47:04 PM PDT by JustDoItAlways
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
When I was sixteen I knew my dad was a dinosaur.

I've got to admit, tho, that between my eighteenth and twenty-fifth birthdays he did a lot of evolving.

27 posted on 04/27/2009 1:55:12 PM PDT by Cheburashka (Lesson #1 from Battlestar Galactica: Never turn your back on your toaster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: decimon

300,000 years is still only the blink of an eye geologically speaking. So, the mass extinction took more than a few years, or a few hundred. It was still very rapid.

The impact theory will have to do until proof of something else is discovered.


28 posted on 04/27/2009 1:56:10 PM PDT by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon

To read later.


29 posted on 04/27/2009 2:01:30 PM PDT by diamond6 (Is SIDS preventable? www.Stopsidsnow.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625
There have been some speculations that the shockwave propagating from the Chicxulub impact may have triggered volcanic eruptions on the other side of the world in India

Being that the Deccan traps started to erupt 5 million years before the "supposed" asteroid hit that would be a good trick.

But I heard the opposite, that the Deccan traps could have caused what's know as a geobleme and that's what Chicxulub could be.

30 posted on 04/27/2009 2:01:47 PM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: decimon

>>However, a number of scientists have since disagreed with this interpretation.<<

They are just a bunch of deniers.

Haven’t they heard, “the debate is over”.


31 posted on 04/27/2009 2:04:07 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Even if it didn’t kill the dinosaurs, I am sorry....it killed something.

You CAN’T tell me with a straight face that a 100-mile wide crater didn’t kill at least one entire species.

Yet this chucklehead actually is trying to claim that. I could buy the time issue with the dinos, but not that.

Nobody else has said anything like that. This nut is out there by himself.


32 posted on 04/27/2009 2:25:24 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

lol...

I still don’t believe the premise that no major extinction events have occurred due to the space rocks causing those big craters.


33 posted on 04/27/2009 2:43:34 PM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I thought they all died from smoking.


34 posted on 04/27/2009 2:47:34 PM PDT by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

I don’t think the report is saying that there were no mass deaths, just not a mass extinction of a entire species.


35 posted on 04/27/2009 2:49:36 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: April Lexington

It is sad for those people to waste good brainpower and often a career to find out everything they’ve written and promoted is discovered to be false. But these fields are so full of hypothesis and guessing it’s really hard to consider them hard science like nuclear physics or chemistry. There’s always so many “may have”, “could”, “might”, “we think”, “it suggests”, in these kinds of areas it is kind of ridiculous to take anything anyone says about anything as ‘gospel’ (no pun intended).


36 posted on 04/27/2009 3:04:36 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Accordng to the EPA they may have all died from being alive (CO2).


37 posted on 04/27/2009 3:05:16 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: decimon
The newest research, led by Gerta Keller of Princeton University in New Jersey, and Thierry Adatte of the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, uses evidence from Mexico to suggest that the Chicxulub impact predates the K-T boundary by as much as 300,000 years.

Maybe they didn't die out right away, but started to decline with the decline in air quality after the asteroid strike.

38 posted on 04/27/2009 3:15:55 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
Maybe they didn't die out right away, but started to decline with the decline in air quality after the asteroid strike.

Yeah, but hundreds of thousands of years? I'd think...ahem...the dust would have settled long before that.

39 posted on 04/27/2009 3:21:45 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Yeah, but hundreds of thousands of years? I'd think...ahem...the dust would have settled long before that.

I admit it sounds like a long time. As I typed, I had the tongue-in-cheek analogy in mind about degradation of the current environment probably not leading to immediate problems, but to doom in the future. Like those dinosaurs.

Don't forget to notice the "sarc" in my sig!

40 posted on 04/27/2009 3:33:22 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine (Is /sarc really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson