Earth's most prominent rainfall feature creeping northward

University of Washington ^ | Jul 1, 2009 | Unknown

[envisio]

"The prospect of additional warming because of greenhouse gases means that situation could happen even sooner"

They have all become corrupt and insane.

You know what that translates to?
Hurry! Buy curly lightbulbs!
Hurry! Spend money on "green" products!"
We need more taxes!
Buy my "green" products or it will be your fault!

[TC Rider]

300 years ago? How did George Bush manage that? (Rove must have a time machine and a weather machine!)

That's what happens when you run a weather machine in parallel with a Interocitor.

[vpintheak]

Exactly. Do they have any other evidence beyond “Probably”? What a load of BS. Maybe it’s happening, but we have no clue why, hey, lets blame it on gloBull warming!

[Daffynition]

[meadsjn]

Changes in rainfall? Temperatures? Minor stuff. Read the following letter I just mailed to all our subscribers to our DLC Newsletter.

Dear Subscribers and Fellow Global Citizens,

Approximately one year ago, the experts here at www.globalcrisisdejeur.org revealed that monitoring stations around the northern hemisphere were reporting an alarming and progressive loss of daylight. We immediately applied for tons of federal funding needed to expand our team of experts, and began generating daily hyper-alerts to raise awareness of the Daylight Loss Crisis (DLC).

Through proven sound scientific practices and diligent research methods, our experts were able to contain the DLC crisis within six months, and by December 22 were able to report a slight upward trend of daily sunlight. Using the same sound scientific methodologies, we were able to quadruple the number of monitoring stations and associated staff, and distribute tons of reserve resources to obscure locations such as Switzerland and the Cayman Islands.

Our meticulous efforts continued producing positive results until early last week, when our monitoring stations reported the alarming and disappointing news that, in spite of all our superb efforts and long period of positive results, the Daylight Loss Crisis had come out of remission. The current rate of loss of daylight is calculated to result in total darkness for the entire northern hemisphere within twelve months, IF our funding increases are not restored to a level that will allow us to adequately address this most alarming crisis.

Our experts immediately examined all the pertinent data to ensure that no mistakes had been made, and concluded that the crisis had resumed simply because of a minor decrease in the rate of increase of our funding.

So we are appealing to you, the most important of protected citizens, to once again join us in raising the alarm, and our funding, so we can once again save the hemisphere from drifting into total darkness.

In the interim, our resource reserves have been severely strained as we ramp up staffing and monitoring to address this most terrifying of unnatural events. We have enclosed a self-addressed envelope for your most generous contribution. Help us stamp out this threat of total darkness. Your dollars will help.

Thank you,

Drs. Wink, Nodd, & Sniffle
DLC Foundation Conservators

[Oldpuppymax]

“...probably due to warming...” Ah, yes. Another claim based on nothing attributed to a fraud. Must be the left at work!

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks decimon.

· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

[jnsun]

The prospect of additional warming ? because of greenhouse gases ? means that situation could happen even sooner.

Why do the authors poison their own research, which in itself is certainly interesting i.e. the movement of the ITCZ over time, with that selected phrase and its bigoted implication of AGW?

Are these legitimate scientists? If so shouldn't they then have to confirm there is such a thing as AGW, or that any GW whatsoever is a result of greenhouse gases rather than the converse, if they are gong to implicate it in a technical paper?

But they do not. Meaning to us they really are fraudulent actors, to the point that one can't even trust their research.

In a very real way this is the psychological mindset of the Left, that is, a bandwagon of unknowing bigots.

As a college instructor I can verify that such limited mindsets pervade academia.

[decimon]

Why do the authors poison their own research, which in itself is certainly interesting i.e. the movement of the ITCZ over time, with that selected phrase and its bigoted implication of AGW?

Dunno. Maybe they must. My interest was in the prospect that the rain belt has moved over a short period of time. Possible historical implications.

[roaddog727]

“The prospect of additional warming because of greenhouse gases means that situation could happen even sooner.

The findings suggest “that increasing greenhouse gases could potentially shift the primary band of precipitation in the tropics with profound implications for the societies and economies that depend on it,” the article says. “

Stoped reading after that. GW propaganda BS