Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Moon is shrinking, say astronomers
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 8/19/10 | AFP

Posted on 08/19/2010 3:20:01 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Fred Nerks

[something I’d planned to do at the time, four months ago:]

http://www.varchive.org/lec/aaas/challenge.htm

[snip] ...on the historic night of July 21, 1969, when Man stepped on the Moon, I made a series of claims in an article written at the invitation of the New York Times, and spelled out earlier as well in memos to the Space Science Board of the National Academy of Sciences. Strong magnetic remanence, I claimed, would be discovered in lunar rocks and lavas, though the Moon itself hardly possesses any magnetic field whatsoever. A steep thermal gradient would be found already a few feet under the surface. Thermoluminescence would disclose that the Moon was heated considerably only thousands of years ago. Hydrocarbons, preferably of aromatic structure, would be found in small quantities, but carbides, into which hydrocarbons would transform when heated, in substantial quantities; expressed radioactivity would be detected in lunar soil and rocks; and several more claims. Already following Apollo XI and XII the score was complete. But each of the discoveries — steep thermal gradient, strong remanent magnetism, recent heating of the lunar surface, carbides and traces of aromatic hydrocarbons, and rich radioactivity of the rocks and dust — evoked exclamations of surprise and at best some far fetched, ad hoc hypotheses. Magnetic anomalies, especially where interplanetary bolts fell, and huge enclaves of neon and argon 40 in lunar rocks, were also claimed by me in advance of the findings. [unsnip]


21 posted on 12/20/2010 6:54:31 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Another fault cut across and deformed several small diameter (~40-m diameter) impact craters (arrows) on the flanks of Mandel’shtam crater (6.5°N, 161°E). The fault carried near-surface crustal materials up and over the craters, burying parts of their floors and rims. About half of the rim and floor of a 20 m-in-diameter crater shown in the box has been lost. Since small craters only have a limited lifetime before they are destroyed by newer impacts, their deformation by the fault shows the fault to be relatively young. Credit: NASA/Goddard/Arizona State University/Smithsonian

22 posted on 12/20/2010 8:22:06 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

"And Leon's getting laaaaarger!"

23 posted on 12/20/2010 8:23:28 PM PST by dfwgator (Welcome to the Gator Nation Will Muschamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Global Warming.


24 posted on 12/20/2010 8:24:29 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
The Moon is also moving two inches further away from the Earth each year.

It's fleeing humankind, obviously.

25 posted on 12/20/2010 8:26:48 PM PST by EternalVigilance (They're not "gay." They're SAD: Sick, Angry, Deviants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson