Skip to comments.
Matter/Antimatter from the Vacuum
Centauri Dreams ^
| 12/10/10
| Paul Gilster
Posted on 12/10/2010 2:37:31 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
If possible, this would be the most important discovery of all time (and that's the understatement of all time).
To: LibWhacker
This is not new. Matter/anti-matter particle fluctuations are a fairly mainstream understanding of ‘vacuum’. They need to be paired as such so energy is conserved. Some postulate that the entire Universe is one such fluctuation.
2
posted on
12/10/2010 2:41:46 PM PST
by
allmost
To: LibWhacker
Matter/Antimatter from the VacuumWhere else would it be?
To: allmost
Never heard the Dirac quote before: That we live in an dense sea of particles and antiparticles, or that we could pull them out at will. Goodbye energy woes and goodbye to the need for a really good propulsion method that’d get us to the stars.
To: LibWhacker
Are the new particles created from the photons... conservation of energy/mass from E = m * c^2?
5
posted on
12/10/2010 2:48:37 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: LibWhacker
My vacuum gets a lot of matter in it. Have to empty it every time.
6
posted on
12/10/2010 2:49:45 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: the invisib1e hand
So far all the antimatter we have has been made in particle colliders. So pulling it out of nothing would be a neat trick.
To: dhs12345
I think the energy would come from what was previously the zero-point energy of the empty space (sometimes called vacuum energy). The theory is that even empty space (without even photons passing through) has a whole bunch of energy associated with it, but kind of equal and opposite, so it doesn’t seem to.
8
posted on
12/10/2010 2:53:34 PM PST
by
Flightdeck
(If you hear me yell "Eject, Eject, Eject!" the last two will be echos...)
To: LibWhacker
9
posted on
12/10/2010 2:55:42 PM PST
by
Pyro7480
("If you know how not to pray, take Joseph as your master, and you will not go astray." - St. Teresa)
To: dhs12345
Not from the photons per se. Rather the laser is used to free matter and antimatter from the quantum stew we’ve all heard so much about.
To: LibWhacker
The concept is decades old. Casimir et al were exploring this theoretically in the first half of last century. Pulling real world usage out of random quantum fluctuations can no doubt be done, the random nature of the wavelengths/position/time/etc make it extremely difficult to convert to classical 'work'.
11
posted on
12/10/2010 2:57:00 PM PST
by
allmost
To: allmost
12
posted on
12/10/2010 2:58:19 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: LibWhacker
13
posted on
12/10/2010 2:59:51 PM PST
by
blasater1960
(Deut 30, Psalm 111...the Torah and the Law, is attainable past, present and forever.)
To: LibWhacker
So nothing consists of unresolved somethings and everything consists of refracted nothing.
14
posted on
12/10/2010 3:04:00 PM PST
by
aruanan
To: LibWhacker
I think it’s been known for some time that the electron is really a fuzzy spot of energy that as we probe deeper into it we discover a cloud of virtual particles that makes us wonder if there is really an electron or just a motley collection of particles waiting to be expressed.
15
posted on
12/10/2010 3:04:25 PM PST
by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: Flightdeck
Something from nothing?
Or maybe a vacuum is not “nothing?” Space is actually made of “ether” after all.
16
posted on
12/10/2010 3:04:39 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: allmost
No, there's nothing new about the quantum stew, but this is new work, just written up in Physical Review Letters describing a way to separate out matter and antimatter from the vacuum.
To: LibWhacker
However, the law of conservation has to still apply, doesn't it? So, if you are producing more matter than you started with, then the extra matter has to come from somewhere.
Fundamental law: you don't get nothin' for free.
18
posted on
12/10/2010 3:09:54 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: count-your-change
Fuzzy is a descriptive. Is it a particle or a wave and Heisenberg?
19
posted on
12/10/2010 3:15:29 PM PST
by
dhs12345
To: LibWhacker
The amount of energy required to agitate the vacuum condition is enormous. Even with harnessing the virtual photons at relatively high efficiency, it seems like a power loss.
20
posted on
12/10/2010 3:15:55 PM PST
by
allmost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson