Posted on 02/10/2019 3:07:18 PM PST by Textide
The obvious clue to this hoax is the letter “s” following the word “model”. If there are many models out there which one is correct? Why haven’t all of the wrong models been thrown in the garbage? How not right is the right model and why can’t they fix it? In science you don’t get to vote on what’s the real outcome you have to design experiments which prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there are no other possible outcomes. That letter “s” is a pesky little devil.
Democrat environmentalists are evil.
If these idiots were truly interested in saving our lives from this predicted sea-level increase they would be proposing legislation BANNING new developments along the coast or taxation along the coast which would discourage living there. Where is this legislation? Conservatives should propose such in democrat controlled states such as California and Massachusetts. Let’s see who is serious and who is lying.
With a little more manipulation and a lot more Grant Money, it may even be lower.
A 14 to 15 centimeter rise by 2100? That’s 5 or 6 inches. Of course New York City will have to be evacuated because of the rising sea level but most of the country will survive OK.
Some insist this is somehow different than the grade school science experiment involving a a full glass of water with ice sticking out of the top. Displacement is displacement.
Son of N?
Given the “success” of climate models over the past thirty years or so, climate “science” appears to be trounced in successes by astrology, which is also obviously settled science.
All these climate scientists working for NOAA, NASA, universities, etc. are all part of a massive welfare state for PHDs who cannot obtain gainful employment elsewhere. They do nothing but calculate fraud upon us and the world.
“we only need to worry about ice in the interior starts melting.”
The interior is gaining ice mass not losing (Zwalle 2016).
And therefore the seas are NOT rising nearly as fast as all papers previously to Zwalle’s, predicted.
Good initial point in that it is the coastal cities that are in danger, New York, Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, all the libtard places that need to be flushed out. If global warming would guarantee the above, then I vote for rapid and decisive global warming.
The destruction of the Antarctic ice sheet may be the result of underwater volcanoes causing warm water.
LOL! Global warming is causing more volcanoes to erupt as the internal core of the earth heats up.
Think what a service the rising ocean levels will do. Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, L.A. Oakland and San Diego sidewalks will be flushed clean of all that homeless poop and pee. The Earth is renewing itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.