Posted on 04/16/2019 12:05:18 PM PDT by ransomnote
Seems weird now, but in those days NO ONE would have given a thought about it being anti homo. It was universally accepted that a boy named sue would be called a sissy
You’re right. In those days, I didn’t see the song as anti homo; and it wasn’t, necessarily. **sigh**
“””It’s not ‘house rules’ - someone complained and tagged it to the mods as objectionable.
I posted one of the first kissin’ pictures because I was appalled.
I think everyone should see the truth of the man and what we’d be subjected to for years to some (OMG!)
My first slap down direct(PM) from the Boss himself since 1998 that I can remember.
Low % = not edgy enough
Irony = helping others
Logic = [haffast]
Conclusion = snowflakes
Constitution/BOR = buttirag
It is what it is.
NO further comment.
That's incorrect. At the time of the deal, it's all quid pro quo...the defendant must be aware of the terms of the agreement. The judge even asks the defendant what the terms of his deal are, to make sure D is aware of what's going on.
Hmm, okay. Maybe it’s different in different jurisdictions.
Well done!
Trump posted a link to this article. Later I’ll post it as a thread.
Time for Democrats to accept reality
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/439680-time-for-democrats-to-accept-reality
Democrats have been living in a fantasy world since the clock struck midnight after November 8, 2016. Rather than accept reality and the results of historic victory of Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton in the last presidential election, Democrats have clutched to conspiracy theories.
The first fantasy was that the 2016 election was tainted by “fake news.” When that backfired, because after all it was the mainstream media that had to apologize for its biased coverage of the race, the narrative had to change. Democrats then settled on another conspiracy theory, hand woven by the Clinton campaign and deeply entrenched within the Obama administration Justice Department that was led by collusion truthers.
[More at link]
Redefining a word to make gay people happy and feel included.
&&&&
I refuse to cede the word “gay” to them. There is nothing happy about their choices.
Thank you, Grimmy, for that background re: the chans. I didn’t know any of this - sometimes I wander over there and lurk, and sometimes I come back screaming MY EYES MY EYES!!! But kudos to them re: the islamist training camp - that’s awesome.
Oh, dear. Feel better MoD.
A lot of that “my eyes my eyes!” stuff is trolls and shills trying to get the chans shut down.
Some of it is annons trolling each other because... they can.
Q maps are gonna be the witness
Of the ultimate test of cerebral fitness.
Amen
Shucks. I stoled it from Twitter. Thought it was funny.
Internet Historian on YouTube had a series about “He Will Not Divide Us”. Fun watch.
Well, thanks for the gargoyles, nonetheless, lady (~snicker~)
In other news, Kate Smith has been posthumously unpersoned.
If you've already picked this part up, forgive the repost. Cletus, please correct if I am misstating anything.
There are rumors that when GWB was at Harvard, he was involved in a homosexual relationship and that there were secret photos taken. These photos were used to blackmail him, and many of his actions as president were a result of this blackmail.
The CIA supposedly blocked release of the photos, as GWB did what he was told. Now, derps no longer control the photos, and the good guys have let Bush know it.
No idea if it's true or not, but I've suspected for a long time that nobody gets elected to high office without the DS having info that would destroy them if they stray off the reservation, which is why they've freaked out over Trump.
The desperation to take Trump down is not just Trump Derangement Syndrome. It's full bore fear. The recounts hoping flip multiple states, panicked celebrities begging members of the electoral college to flip their votes to send the election to the House, the continual clinging to the narrative after it's been totally blown up. They're scared to death.
Cletus,
My apologies for intruding, but I have an observation.
Q said this stuff won’t be for everyone. I believe that’s true. Many of us diggers have had to take a break for a couple days periodically to refresh before we jump back in the ring.
Here on FR, we are bound by some written and unwritten rules regarding community standards. That’s okay. We’re playing in Jim’s house. Just being here is our implied consent to obey those rules.
Q Team discussions are relegated to one single thread which is magnificently maintained by dear ransom, Mother of Dragons.
Given the warnings, and given our relegation to this single thread, I would argue that the topics alone here are worse than two dudes kissing.
The only reason I haven’t memed those pictures is I haven’t come up with anything really good.
With all of the above, I don’t think anyone should come into a Q thread and start complaining about being “offended” and get posts deleted.
We are invested in TRUTH. For those that aren’t ready to discover, address, and see the truth, then they should politely excuse themselves from the conversation.
They should NOT ask, or demand, that posts be removed because a picture or comment sends them to the fainting couch.
We all know that we are part of an examination of facts that have never been explored and exposed. Sometimes that will be uncomfortable.
I’ll post pictures of the two dudes kissing because that needs coverage. I think it’s revolting. For anyone to think that posting a picture implies endorsement? Well they’re just selectively applying their logic and looking for something to complain about.
I’ve restrained from posting anything gratuitous out of respect for fellow FReeQs’ requests. Though I’ve never posted anything that was not in keeping with overall FR standards, when I find the kissy boy meme that’s worthy, I’ll post it.
Like Ransom said, people who feel their rights are restricted will protest by exercising those rights.
That’s all I have to say about that.
Great find on the leaked 302s, Mairdie.
Thanks for posting!
Sherman Skolnick, d, 2006.
American independent journalist
Some say conspiracy nut job.
Text for my posts come from a collections of his writings, auto-published under the title, “overthrow of the American republic.
Link up thread.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.