Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Viral Math Problem
New York Post ^ | August 1, 2019 | Frank Miles

Posted on 08/01/2019 4:58:47 AM PDT by Renkluaf

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last
To: ladyjane

I’m a geologist. DON’T call me an engineer, please!


81 posted on 08/01/2019 6:03:27 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: golux
c = 3
o = 15
v = 22
f = 6
e = 5
f = 6
e = 5
--------
62

82 posted on 08/01/2019 6:05:14 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

In my 12 years of primary schooling, the best grade I ever got in any math course was a “C”...once. I failed nearly every class and had to go to summer school for several years.

My schooling took place through the sixties and mid-seventies and in counting I went to 12 different schools.

Taught one way in Catholic schools. Differently in military schools on one base. Again differently on another base. Then differently again back in one school system. And differently in another school system in another state.

All this overlaid with a least three major changes in society attitudes of teaching math from traditional math, to New Math, back so some non-New Math method...

No damn wonder I struggled. I nearly had a nervous breakdown trying to pass Physical Chemistry, but I did it on my own two feet.

Then I saw this absolutely totally insane Common Core approach to math, and thought “If this ever goes through, we are screwed as a country. We will never have competent engineers again.”

Bottom line for me-I think there are multiple ways math can be taught, but one method will work great for one person and not for another, and that is the way it is. Using one approach rigidly will always leave some people behind.


83 posted on 08/01/2019 6:10:40 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: fruser1

“E.g. if I want to say that a times b, is divided by c times d I would write

ab / cd”

To start with your sentence is ambiguous. You realize that now, don’t you?

The “ab/cd” means a * b / c * d which is evaluated left to right:

multiply a by b
divide that result by c
multiply that result by d


84 posted on 08/01/2019 6:15:03 AM PDT by cymbeline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

16, but many will get the loneliest number... 1.


85 posted on 08/01/2019 6:17:15 AM PDT by Ingtar (Funds Robbed from Everyone Else. F.R.E.E.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

math is weight lifting for the mind ... and ya gotta start light and be patient ...


86 posted on 08/01/2019 6:17:30 AM PDT by bankwalker (Immigration without assimilation is an invasion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

It is not ambiguous.

The order in which operations should be done is abbreviated as PEMDAS:
Parentheses.
Exponents.
Multiplication and Division (from left to right)
Addition and Subtraction (from left to right)

So:

8÷2(2+2)

That means “2+2” goes first. So

8÷2(4)

Next, you take 8÷2. So

4(4)

So the answer is 16.

But that is the reason I prefer to group operations in parentheses, anyway:

(8/2)*(2+2)

There are no questions about what that means. That way I don’t have to care about “PEMDAS.”


87 posted on 08/01/2019 6:30:11 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vipper

“8/2(2+2)
8/2(4)
4(4)

Result 16”

Wrong.
Even if you choose to do operations from left to right, the multiplication or division is against EVERYTHING AFTER THE OPERATION SIGN until you get to addition or subtraction signs outside of brackets or parentheses (or powers)

8/2(4) = (8/2)/4 = 4/4 = 1
That’s the same as
8/2(4) = 8/[(2)(4)] = 8/8 = 1
but the brackets are understood not to be needed.

In contrast, 8/2+4 = (8/2) + 4 = 4 + 4 = 8
and
8/(2+4) = 8/6 = 1 1/3

Or, go backward, and remember that division is the same as multiplication by 1 over the item you’re dividing by:

1 = 8/8 = 8/(2)(4) = (8/1)[1/{(2)(4)}] = (8/1)(1/2)(1/4)

To write it they way you’re implying it should be interpreted would be
(8/2)(4).


88 posted on 08/01/2019 6:32:35 AM PDT by Notthemomma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

I never had any aptitude for it, but when I made up my mind after I got out of the USN that I was going to college as a Chemistry major, I knew I would have to work hard to make up for my lack of aptitude.

That took me where I needed to go, but I admit to not enjoying it. You simply cannot BS your way through math. You have to do it.

That is why I laugh derisively when I see people say math is “racist”. It is simply the single most OBJECTIVE thing out there I can envision.

The math either works...or it doesn’t. No middle ground.


89 posted on 08/01/2019 6:34:53 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Sounds terrible


90 posted on 08/01/2019 6:37:03 AM PDT by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: golux

Oh, now it makes sense. ;)


91 posted on 08/01/2019 6:37:51 AM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Agreed,
I figured 16 too.


92 posted on 08/01/2019 6:38:37 AM PDT by Big Red Badger (Despised by the Despicable!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65

It’s parentheses and powers, then multiplication and division, then addition and subtraction.

Multiplication and division are done at the same time (left to right.) It’s usually presented as a list, but it’s three tiers.


93 posted on 08/01/2019 6:41:57 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf
You proles are all wrong.



94 posted on 08/01/2019 6:45:04 AM PDT by democratsaremyenemy (Streepisacreep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

This is fun if you are only talking about numbers.
Lets say all those numbers are dollars and your bank has to figure out how much interest to pay you.


95 posted on 08/01/2019 6:47:40 AM PDT by fproy2222 (MAGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: central_va

This would be correctly written as

8
-— (2+2) = 16
2

The whole issue is whether or not multiplication is a higher precedence than division. It isn’t; they are at the same level and are done left to right.


96 posted on 08/01/2019 6:49:31 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

The answer is 1, by the way I learned math. I am not going to change my math rules now, and I am not going to change the pronouns I use. So There!


97 posted on 08/01/2019 6:49:40 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

1


98 posted on 08/01/2019 6:55:50 AM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

8/2(2+2) = 8/2*4 = 4*4 = 16

8/2*4 = (8/2)*4, not 8/(2*4)

Multiplication and division are at the same priority and are done left to right if written left to right.


99 posted on 08/01/2019 6:56:24 AM PDT by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Renkluaf

the way it’s written, according to the rules of math, it’s 8 divided by 2 which equals 4.

Then it’s four times (2+2), which makes it 16.

If the 2(2+2) were to be taken as one unit, then it would have been written as [2(2+2)] which would make it 8 divided by 8 equaling one.


100 posted on 08/01/2019 6:58:23 AM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-171 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson