Posted on 01/06/2020 5:24:23 AM PST by PapaBear3625
“” “” Soleimani was operating as a terrorist leader in a hostile country.”” “”
It seems like large number of Iraqis do not share your opinion.
To be “honest” generals seldom are on the BF unless they are in dire straights, or doing photo ops.
The failure of the U.S. to hold Pakistan accountable for harboring OBL is a pathetic, scathing indictment of our stupid “war on terror.”
“Hostile country?” LOL. He flew into Baghdad Airport on a charter flight and basically got an Uber ride at the curb.
True enough. In case of Soleimani I bet Al-Qaeda and ISIS uncorked a bottle of whatever camel piss they like to celebrate.
“It seems like large number of Iraqis do not share your opinion.”
Whose side our you on regarding this killing?
If Iran attacked the White House the Dems would blame Trump. If he responded and hit Iran back they would call him a warmonger. If they attacked a Trump property Pelosi and the gang would say he brought it on himself. Let this all sink in.
You can’t be serious.
What a John Kerryesque kind of move.
If Iran bombed Amazon or the New York Times it would be ‘political’? Gimme a break.
Have you forgotten Obama paid the Iranians off and tried to ally with them?
There’s a reason Benghazi went the way it did.
None. It is not a matter of picking sides. Although killing him will empower terrorists in the region and will result in deterioration of US influence in ME and beyond.
To be precise, he was killed on a battlefield. Iraq is still listed as a combat zone by DoS. The entire country.
The traitor married his daughter off to a connected Iranian.
How America Killed the Japanese Admiral Who Masterminded the Pearl Harbor Attack
It's essentially the same as killing Suleimani. Are you going to send you deepest regrets and condolences to the family of Yamamoto too?
He’s fine with it. He is the same enemy of America he has always been.
Better condemn the Brits for assassinating Heydrich.
A militarily expansive Iran evolved thru Obama’s carefully executed financial largesse (read US tax dollars).
Obama's entire basis for giving Iran $1.3 billion tax dollars in cash on palettes in the middle of the night
was based on Obama's engineering a secret quid pro quo....that benefitted him and him alone.
Moreover, Obama's returning to Iran of the $150 billion in so-called "confiscated assets" was most assuredly
not an expression of Obama's generosity..........far from it. This was a quid pro quo to end all quid pro quos.
How do we know? B/c Obama WILL NOT DIVULGE donors to his Clintonesque Foundation
......the foundation that's building his "final resting place" in Chicago.
Obama has another foundation dedicated to his Nigerian dad run by his brother........yes, it's as crooked as you think.
=========================================
Where did Obama get billions of tax dollars he gave to Iran?
Obama's $1.3B giveaway to Iran was paid in cash Jan 22 and Feb 5 from a little-known fund administered by the US Treasury.
The so-called Judgment Fund is made up of tax dollars Congress has permanently approved in the event it's needed....(cue laugh machine here)
SOURCE: fiscaltreasury.gov. -----The Judgment Fund was established to pay court judgments and Justice Department compromise settlements of actual or imminent lawsuits against the government. It is administered by the Judgment Fund Section, which is a part of the United States Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The Judgment Fund Internet Claims System (JFICS) is the application used to process all Judgment Fund claims.
The Judgment Fund is a permanent, indefinite appropriation available to pay judicially and administratively ordered monetary awards against the United States. The Judgment Fund is also available to pay amounts owed under compromise agreements negotiated by the U.S. Department of Justice in settlement of claims arising under actual or imminent litigation, if a judgment on the merits would be payable from the Judgment Fund. The statutory authority for the Judgment Fund is 31 U.S.C. 1304.
If funds for paying an award are otherwise provided for in the appropriations of the defendant agency, the Judgment Fund may not pay an award. A federal agency may request that payment of an award be made on its behalf from the Judgment Fund only in those instances where funds are not legally available to pay the award from the agency's own appropriations.
Amounts paid vary significantly from year-to-year. Federal agencies are not required to reimburse the Judgment Fund except when cases are filed under the Contract Disputes Act (CDA) or the No FEAR Act (Notification and Federal Employee Antidiscrimination and Retaliation Act).
Contact judgment.fund@fiscal.treasury.gov or 202-874-6664.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.