Skip to comments.
Trump campaign spokesman rips GOP congressman over rejection of QAnon conspiracy
The Hill ^
| 08/12/20 05:41 PM EDT
| BY JOHN BOWDEN
Posted on 08/12/2020 8:28:57 PM PDT by RandFan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
To: Mariner
Only the deluded believe q has some special inside knowledge. Or crazy, whichever you prefer. You're right. If patriotism makes you deluded and crazy.
If listening to someone who is exposing the world to the truth of how we have been lied to all our lives and who has been doing the lying.
Funny how just a few short years ago us 'Qtards' were mocked and laughed at for talking about the Epstein operation. Now that's discussed by mainstream Freepers.
Funny how that works.
41
posted on
08/12/2020 11:15:38 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: familyop
Domestic accounts in the U.S. linked to QAnon conspiracy theorists were also removed as part of Facebooks latest salvo against misinformation, according to the latest Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior Report. I suppose you support this action.
You may be surprised to discover who 'calls the shots' at Facebook. I assure you its not Jeff Zuckerberg.
You are supporting the enemy.
42
posted on
08/12/2020 11:18:00 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: familyop
We dont want more hoax dossiers or conspiracy theories from Russia. We dont need conspiracy theory input from China or Iran, either. Its ironic that you speak out against 'conspiracy theories' while espousing one.
To believe that Russia, China, or Iran is behind the qanon movement is itself a conspiracy theory.
43
posted on
08/12/2020 11:21:12 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: familyop
No. Not a large portion of them at all. Most of them would rather help the Democrats to make Republicans look bad. So would most PLA members. What in interesting conspiracy theory you got there.
I encourage you to look into what the actual people of Iran and Hong Kong think of America. You may be surprised.
But you do have a point. The deep state controlled leaders of Iran and China will do anything to see that the deep state regains control of America and stops Trump from ruining their dastardly plans.
44
posted on
08/12/2020 11:25:34 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: LouieFisk
45
posted on
08/12/2020 11:28:02 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: AllAmericanGirl44
I will say that the dull and defeatist attitude here is what makes the site look bad. Endless carping about how nothing ever changes, all the while overlooking many positive steps made. Constant criticism of our President and how all the geniuses here could do it so much better. That makes the place unbearable and sounding like nut jobs. Seems the oldies prefer to ride on coattails of long gone days and bring nothing fresh and new but damn, they can bitch up a storm. A greater truth was never told.
I second that emotion.
46
posted on
08/12/2020 11:28:36 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: NRx
There is no deep state. It is an internet hoax, probably invented by leftists to make us look like a bunch of tin foil hat nut jobs. Stop drinking their Kool Aid. OK, Kamala.
47
posted on
08/12/2020 11:29:30 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: familyop
"There is no deep state."Agreed. I thought it was a good nickname for Clinton and Obama holdovers in government offices, until I saw where it's going.
Again. To be exposed to the multitude of evidence that there is, in fact, an international deep state and not 'believe' that there is one, makes you a part of the problem.
Or maybe you just haven't been exposed to the evidence. That comes from relying on derp media for your information and ignoring the 'new' media. Which is us.
You people didn't understand or believe the Epstein operation was what it was until you heard about it from your 'approved' media spigots.
Now you're all about it.
Funny how that works.
#WeAreTheNewsNow
48
posted on
08/12/2020 11:33:37 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: familyop
Agreed. I thought it was a good nickname for Clinton and Obama holdovers in government offices, until I saw where it's going. Now do Lindsay Graham, Paul Ryno, and John Roberts.
49
posted on
08/12/2020 11:34:32 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: mbrfl
Qanon is Chinese intelligence.And you dont think POTUS would have said something about it if that were so? Your claim doesnt even make sense. Q is pro-Trump and far from pro-Chinese. If its Chinese intelligence, theyre doing a damn poor job.
Absolutely.
If Q were a Chinese, Russian, Iranian, democrat, or any other enemy of America, Trump would know that and he would shut it down.
And he could shut it down with one word. Why hasn't he done it?
#ConspiracyTheoryFail
50
posted on
08/12/2020 11:37:09 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: grey_whiskers
No outside comms. Haha.
That's right.
51
posted on
08/12/2020 11:41:24 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: RandFan
Classic straw-man ploy:
Attempt to discredit evidence based Spy-gate allegations by conflating them with wacky Q theories and failed Q predictions.
This is a perfect example of why Q is not just harmless sport - Q (
Qgives the Left a perfect tool for making serious evidence-based allegations look like crack pot theories.
To: enumerated
So why does the MSM go so far out of their way to attempt to discredit Q drops?
Why has facebook worked so hard to delete so many accounts spreading something that is allegedly so useful to the left.
Why does twitter do the same?
All for a fraud?
53
posted on
08/12/2020 11:46:10 PM PDT
by
eldoradude
(Bad robot)
To: enumerated
Attempt to discredit evidence based Spy-gate allegations by conflating them with wacky Q theories and failed Q predictions. You're absolutely right. This is a time tested tactic of the derps. First, label something or someone a whack conspiracy theory, and then tag any information that goes against [Them] with that whack conspiracy theory.
That method was developed by the CIA during the JFK assassination investigation and has worked amazingly well ever since, with the unknowing and willing cooperation of people like you.
Great job, patriot.
And for the record, there are no 'wacky Q theories'. They don't become wacky just because you and the derps say so.
#YouAreBeingLiedTo
54
posted on
08/12/2020 11:49:07 PM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: enumerated
Other way around.
Q was on the spying on the President long before anyone else took it seriously.
55
posted on
08/12/2020 11:57:08 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: LouieFisk
You’re way behind the times if you think Q was a 4chan prank.
56
posted on
08/12/2020 11:58:07 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: you
57
posted on
08/13/2020 12:00:47 AM PDT
by
deks
To: ransomnote
Ping Q 🇺🇸
58
posted on
08/13/2020 12:30:00 AM PDT
by
Laslo Fripp
(The Sybil of Free Republic)
To: deks
Thank you for posting that, deks. Its good to watch every once in a while. To remember why we fight.
59
posted on
08/13/2020 1:35:35 AM PDT
by
bagster
("Even bad men love their mamas".)
To: enumerated
You win this critical thinking exercise.
60
posted on
08/13/2020 2:18:01 AM PDT
by
epluribus_2
(He, had the best mom - ever.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-96 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson