Skip to comments.
DailyKos to Dems: Vote Romney!
WND ^
| 1-11-08
Posted on 01/11/2008 4:03:48 PM PST by hope
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: hope
Yup...they realize the Romulan is the easiest to defeat!
21
posted on
01/11/2008 4:22:49 PM PST
by
meandog
(I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
To: FFranco
If McCain or Huckabee wins Michigan, and Romney pulls out, then Fred Thompson has little chance of winning South Carolina. And the Republicans have even less chance of nominating someone who will roll over for the Dumbocrat agenda.
I, for one, ain't gonna vote for open borders and socialism-lite.
22
posted on
01/11/2008 4:25:09 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: Vigilanteman
I have not seen such division and hand wringing in my life in the Republican Party...
Hillary will be our next president for sure. I suppose that's better than BO.
23
posted on
01/11/2008 4:38:29 PM PST
by
hope
(Isaiah 53 nothing redacted)
who will roll over = who won't roll over
24
posted on
01/11/2008 4:50:24 PM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: All
Not surprising at all to me. Mitt is a chameleon. If he is the republican nominee many conservatives might stay home or vote third party because they don’t trust what he says.
25
posted on
01/11/2008 5:11:34 PM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
To: Vigilanteman
I can’t see Romney pulling out soon no matter what happens. Maybe after super Tues. but not before.
26
posted on
01/11/2008 5:13:35 PM PST
by
The Ghost of FReepers Past
(Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
To: hope
That sure sucks the wind out of any Slick Willard victory.
He needs the KOSsacks to win. LOL
27
posted on
01/11/2008 5:14:47 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Slick Willard is just McCain's stalking horse. There's a corrupt bargain afoot.)
To: manic4organic
28
posted on
01/11/2008 5:16:20 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Slick Willard is just McCain's stalking horse. There's a corrupt bargain afoot.)
To: meandog
I remember you as a McCain supporter way back....You still there?
29
posted on
01/11/2008 5:19:57 PM PST
by
hope
(Isaiah 53 nothing redacted)
To: hope
Yup...nothing has changed. Call it loyalty.
30
posted on
01/11/2008 5:22:56 PM PST
by
meandog
(I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
To: cripplecreek
I’m no Romney fan but Romney isn’t exactly the candidate that would be easiest to beat.You've gotta be jokin' jack. The Romulan is the perfect set up for a 45-state blitz by the Dems. He'd carry only Utah, Nevada, Wyoming, and perhaps Idaho, maybe one other state. It will be the worst Republican defeat since Goldwater v. LBJ/Hoover v. FDR; and just consider what those defeats cost--Socialistic Security (now going broke), Medicare (going broker), welfare entitlements, high taxes, higher crime, and liberal judges somewhere to the left of Karl Marx that will let the criminals out again to prey on society!
It took the Republicans 16 years (from 1964 to 1980) to recover from the last Democratic sweep. It will take even longer should the Romulan ever get the nod.
31
posted on
01/11/2008 5:35:04 PM PST
by
meandog
(I'm one of the FEW and the BRAVE FReepers still supporting John McCain)
To: meandog
Personally I don’t think anyone in the top 3 really has much of a chance against the democrats anyway. Its kind of a moot point to me but I gave the opinion.
32
posted on
01/11/2008 5:45:53 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
To: meandog
Well, I can admire that. John and Fred are the best we can come up with right now. Hopefully if McCain wins the nomination he will be prepared for the Hildibeast. Of course in a fashion that does not include implosion.
33
posted on
01/11/2008 6:13:10 PM PST
by
hope
(Isaiah 53 nothing redacted)
To: Petronski
34
posted on
01/11/2008 6:14:47 PM PST
by
hope
(Isaiah 53 nothing redacted)
To: hope
It would be such a pleasant change to all the liberal votes for McCain.
35
posted on
01/11/2008 6:17:21 PM PST
by
bmwcyle
(Joy Behar ain't no Saint)
To: bmwcyle
36
posted on
01/11/2008 6:19:04 PM PST
by
hope
(Isaiah 53 nothing redacted)
To: bmwcyle
37
posted on
01/11/2008 6:19:07 PM PST
by
hope
(Isaiah 53 nothing redacted)
To: hope
How nice that the democrats are filleting each other without any outside help.
38
posted on
01/11/2008 6:19:24 PM PST
by
bannie
(Jimminy Cricket is hollering, "Beware!!! clintons CHEAT!")
To: hope
So the rats that would switch over and vote Mitt, who normally be the ones to vote for Obama, so it essance, they take votes away from Obama to give to Hillary?
WTF?
39
posted on
01/11/2008 6:31:11 PM PST
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(To Err Is Human. To Arr is Pirate. To Unnngh! is Freeper.)
To: K4Harty
40
posted on
01/11/2008 8:52:31 PM PST
by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson