git a rope! Yeah, fellow Freepers, Rick ain't perfect but he'll git her done! Right... 
big?
Posted on 10/26/2011 3:27:17 PM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
git a rope! Yeah, fellow Freepers, Rick ain't perfect but he'll git her done! Right... big?
What a smug SOB
And his dumbass wife doesn’t know her heart from her clavicle.
(Capt. Kirk) “Khaaaaaaan!!”
This is a good reminder of why Perry has been controlling how the information of his security detail and travel arrangements gets out.
The Texas MSM has been hounding Gov. Perry about his travel records but the courts understand he needs to release them in a way that will not compromise his safety.
He has at least a 24 man Texas Ranger team protecting him.
Yes, I remember the insinuations and innuendos from various outlets a few months ago trying to float the story that Perry was perhaps an Islamophile.
Now I’m wondering who would have benefited had this Mohamed Elibiary idiot managed to plant a story that Perry was, in fact, the opposite...an Islamophobe.
Would conservatives reject a potential Perry candidacy because of rumors of Islamophobia? I don’t think so. In fact, I think it might burnish his conservative bona fides. Now I’m wondering who might want to do that? And, why?
Regardless, if an advisor to the Homeland Security Dept is documented to be abusing his official capacity, in Texas or anywhere else, he should be fired immediately and investigated for potential criminal charges. I’m sure Napolitano will get right on that. Yep.
A Mohammedan? I would have taken “Mohamed Elibiary” as a typical Amish name, myself.
Kind of makes you wonder what else the Regime may be using DHS for.
I’m sure there are some freepers who support this guy’s efforts. And would do the same thing if they could.
“I want hearings and Napolitano’s job yanked.”
Absolutely right. I’m trembling. I am so filled with expletives that I can’t get focused.
Things are starting to make sense as to what happened with Rick Perry.
Wait, you’re saying you’re sure there are freepers who support a Mohammedan advisor to the Homeland Security Dept abusing his official position in order to examine and download intel files from a State’s database, then whine to the media and to the ACLU about Islamophobia?
I hope you can name a few of those freepers, because I’d bet money jimrob would zot them so fast it would make my head spin if you could substantiate such an allegation.
All Perry accomplished by going up in front of a racist, radical organization, which is 100 percent pro-illegal alien, was to lend credibility and legitimacy to La Raza.
Of course, you, Perry and everyone else knows this, and knows the reason he did this was too gain votes/support from these pro-illegal alien, racist organizations.
I wish DHS was never created..
“Of course, you, Perry and everyone else knows this, and knows the reason he did this was too gain votes/support from these pro-illegal alien, racist organizations”
Good God. YOU don’t get it. I hope John Cornyn starts an investigation yesterday.
God bless America.
Fascinating, from the Stein piece I linked through to the outline of the “pro-Islam” curriculum that was apparently put together by a bush (Bush?) league retired history teacher in TX.
Here’s the link, and what an incredible piece of tripe:
http://www.countercontempt.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/conflict_notes1.pdf
Along with problems of basic agreement in the grammar throughout the notes (I’m not sure who’s responsible for that), the actual content is a sorry mishmash and meandering of an apologist’s explanation of why Muslims are trying to kill us.
The entire formation of Israel seems to bypass UN mandate and just be presented as an old neighborhood being overwhelmed by newcomers. There seems to be no acknowledgment of the most basic and fundamental teachings in the Koran as to killing or tricking infidels, however most expedient, until Islam rules the world. Always, when there is mention of modernity besting traditional Islamic cultures, there is a weak equivalency along the lines of, “Oh, like Islam used to be superior to Western culture”, to offer parity.
Anti-Semitism in Islam is presented as some sort of modern outgrowth of Hitler’s biases. Hezbollah is presented as a reasonable response to Israeli aggression. Hamas as simply created in response to corruption within the secular Fatah movement.
I must say, it is a little dated, presenting the Taliban as a greater threat to Al-Qaeda, when the Obama administration has been cozied up with the Taliban in Afghanistan for a couple of years now.
One bizarre footnote explains the creation of Palistinians as a people as akin to the name given to Canadiens—and then apparently it is Woodrow Wilson’s fault that such people seek self-determination and their own government.
Here’s a sentence from another footnote that about sums it all up: “It is the position in this outline that the problems Islamic Civilization has vis-a-vis the West is (sic) due to its failure to adopt modernity with its secular, tolerant, and pluralistic stance, “or by [its failure to find] some other successful response to Western influence” (quoting from the Conclusions)”.
That it is expressly the teaching of Mohammed through the Koran that Islam is supposed to subjugate and violently, if necessary, rule over all others somehow misses this oddly detailed “curriculum” on Islam for dissemination through the public schools in TX.
Post Script:
Here is the entirety of the outline regarding Western “mistakes” in “getting along with Islam”:
I]. Mistakes Westerners have made in getting along with Islam.
A. Arrogance and lack of respect
1. Believing that Muslims come from an inferior culture.
B. Lack of knowledge
1. Belief that most Muslims are terrorists.
2. Too little understanding of Islamic beliefs.
C. Is insisting that Muslims meet certain standards valued by Westerners a mistake? If the initial answer is “no”, is the answer still “no” when women’s rights is specified as a value.
PPS Here’s a choice excerpt from the conclusions:
[A challenge in the West is to keep the small number of Islamic terrorists from coloring our view of Islam] (religion and civilization), muddying the waters and [poisoning our relationship with the majority of Muslims. Whether Muslims can tolerate the West is another question.] Muslims may feel that conflicts with the West are inherent in the current situation; we needn’t . A further challenge in the West is to avoid demanding that Islamic states conform to Western democratic standards. By demanding that they meet our cultural standards we create tensions (or should we encourage justice for women and other minorities?). Instead, [we should show good will toward Islam and Islamic states while fighting Islamic inspired acts of violence.”
Isn’t that 23 too many? I thought it was one riot, one ranger.
No, I’m saying there are some unprincipled freepers who would delight in anything that they think might bring Perry down. They lie, they twist, and this would be right up their alley.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.