Posted on 11/26/2011 12:31:21 PM PST by rzman21
Works for me as long as we are talking about actual policy proposals he has made and not hyperventilating misrepresentations that have no actual basis in fact. FReegards...
“Maybe you should go live in Derry Maine then. No Mexicans there. Just Somalians. And Tommyknockers. Gotta beware them too. “
I guess you’re down to personal attacks, as usual.
Have a nice day.
Thanks for posting the 10 points.
Sadly, very few will read it in its entirety.
You should post it on every Newt thread for emphasis.
Those of us who are forgiving of his mistakes and flaws will probably soon be zotted for our Christian redemption.
I forgot a question.
If the illegal immigrants don’t have a passport (and I expect they don’t); How will they get home? If the 25 year residents want to travel abroad - will they have to secure a passport from their native country’s consulate and will they be allowed to return to the US on a ‘visitor’s’ visa?
Lots of paperwork ahead;)
Damnation by faint praise if I have ever heard it!
Yes - and I would be the leading rebounder in a midget basketball league.
Exactly.
That’s only saying that Gingrich is more Conservative than Bush.
That’s not saying much. Sure, Podhoretz said that Bush was Conservative, but Podhoretz is a lying scumbag.
With Newt, you never know what you are getting. One minute he’s on the couch with Nazi Pelosi and her poisonous global warming agenda and the next minute he’s for illegal immigration. Then he’s against the global warming agenda and against illegal immigration.
As president, we would be in big trouble when he flies off the handle from common sense and does something disasterous to our Nation only to regret it after he gets caught.
Because of his lack of experience and knowledge, Cain is a sitting duck for any and all schemes of the elite. Grinrich would know ahead of time how he is screwing the “conservatives.”
That’s not saying much. Most any Republican not named Romney would be the most conservative president since Reagan.
Doesn't matter if he has or hasn't. We haven't had a conservative president since Reagan. It's not a particularly high bar.
You clearly know nothing about this issue. I and my legal partners have had a hand in the AZ, AL and SC immigration laws, state voter ID provisions, and current Congressional bills regarding birthright citizenship. Newt's "proposals", if you can call them that (academic fantasies?), are totally insubstantial, vague and imaginary, and do absolutely nothing to either curb illegal entries nor restrict, let alone prohibit, anchor babies. You are an ignoramus and have no business writing anything in this forum until you have educated yourself on the issues.
Oh, that would be dandy. "Challenge" him on what? The carbon tax he supported as late as 2009? The individual mandate he supported as late as this year? His love for Agenda 21 -- oh, wait, that;s right, he now claims to oppose it. His being the king of crony capitalism and revolving door D.C. influence peddling? Wouldn't it just be easier to just nominate an actual, moral, conservative?
Newt is not a conservative. His love of illegal aliens exposed his real self. Not even a moderate could honestly say that supporting illegal aliens is good for this country.
Hopefully, Newt would appoint a strong cabinet who would not be afraid to challenge him.
If Newt runs against Obama, he will have very short coattails as the Tea Party conserrvatives will not have a candidate in the race. If he were to win, he will take over with a Democrat controlled Senate and House (I consider Crybaby Boner a Democrat plant).
The last time Newt was challenged, he quit. I don't think he will surround himself with anyone who will not support him, in all his smartness, 100%.
Reaching across the aisle, he will be able to implement every hair-brain idea, including amnesty, the liberals will vote for. At least it will finally end the Republican party being a viable national alternative. If there is enough time, and this is a very big if, the American people will arise in a new conservative party to at least make the attempt to return America to a Great Constitutional Republic.
We are getting a RINO for president in 2012. I am livid, because we need a Conservative at this tipping point. We are in a rapidly worsening economic depression, and the masses will be calling for more bread and circuses. The demand for socialism will be higher, not lower. The RINOs will continue to expand government as they always have in the past.
Gone will be our dream of limiting the size and cost of Federal government, and eliminating or hamstring agencies such as Education, Energy and EPA and hundreds more.
We’re screwed. Bachman was a non-starter and Cain has no inside connections to get elected. Palin really would be in much the same boat as Cain. She acts like an outsider, so he lacks the necessary support from part of the establishment needed to win the primary.
I am so very tempted to write in Palin’s name for president and let the USA crumble to hell.
Thanks rzman21.
Sorry to burst your bubble, friend, but hardly anyone is going to read that virtual wall of propaganda text you posted.
Someone like Santorum, Bachmannn or Paul all are more conservative than Newt and have more legislative experience than Cain.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.