Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Coming Democrat Bloodbath: Don Your HazMat Suits
ClashDaily.com ^ | 10/10/14 | Donald Joy

Posted on 10/10/2014 10:17:10 AM PDT by IChing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Dick Bachert

Love it!


21 posted on 10/10/2014 10:55:44 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

If they won’t throw us some bones, Reid can keep his crown.
If they want our votes...


22 posted on 10/10/2014 10:56:26 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IChing

I would say so. I know the Democrat Party will not go quietly. they have some type of skullduggery up their sleeve.


23 posted on 10/10/2014 10:56:44 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sgt_Schultze

Catalist is scary as hell, however if the commiecrat base is truly demoralized (and fraud is minimized) it won’t matter.


24 posted on 10/10/2014 10:58:37 AM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: USS Alaska

Exactly, it is our choice. My vote is not owned or owed to liberal R’s and I have no duty to vote for those whose ideas and policies I disagree with.

That is not a hard thing to understand.


25 posted on 10/10/2014 11:02:17 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: IChing

26 posted on 10/10/2014 11:24:33 AM PDT by Bobalu (Hashem Yerachem (May God Have Mercy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IChing

Things do seem to be breaking late for the Pubbies.

Not that they are liable to do much with it.


27 posted on 10/10/2014 11:31:23 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
It pains me to think there may be some positive in voting for a democrat but I’m considering the options.

Such a typical Connecticut loser attitude you have.

Name one Connecticut Democrat that you have an ability vote for this election who outshines his Republican opponent.

Go ahead. Name one.

And then tell us all why, based on all his/her glimmering conservative credentials.

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

28 posted on 10/10/2014 11:59:02 AM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

Simmer down and switch the green can. You call me a loser because I rightly assess the pansy-load nature of republican leadership? I suppose you admire Boehner and McConnell. I suppose you hang on every word Karl Marx Rove utters. If you like the current state of the GOP-e you’re the south end of a north bound horse.

Have a grown-up reread my original comment and its just possible you’ll find out that I was WONDERING if deadlock was preferable to the go-along-get-along GOP-e

Careful reading is a valuable life skill, look into it.


29 posted on 10/10/2014 12:08:49 PM PDT by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
All I needed to read is this:

It pains me to think there may be some positive in voting for a democrat ...

I was able to read quite plainly what you wrote.

I suppose you admire Boehner and McConnell. I suppose you hang on every word Karl Marx Rove utters.

Maybe its you who needs a basic reading comprehension course. Where did you read that statement anywhere in what I wrote?

YOU ASS-umed way too much

...and its just possible you’ll find out that I was WONDERING if deadlock was preferable....

Not possible at all.

Now you're just "wondering" are you? No, you weren't just wondering anything. The larger quote you wrote is this: "...perhaps the best strategy in the near term is to keep both parties from achieving total control. It pains me to think there may be some positive in voting for a democrat but I’m considering the options.

You are speaking personally about what -- in your presumed enlightenment -- YOU are considering doing.

That's not "wondering." Wondering is mere philosophizing. Considering involves the willful act of planning.

You're just using weasel words now as some feeble attempt to back away from what you wrote.

If you think "wondering" is a word equal and interchangeable with the word, "considering," it is evident that you'll need to develop more accomplished English composition skills.

You live in Connecticut as do I. I challenged you to name the (D) YOU are "considering" voting for as a better choice than any other (R) that it is possible for you to vote for.

We're all waiting.

FReegards!

 photo million-vet-march.jpg

30 posted on 10/10/2014 1:04:48 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu

LMAO!!! I’ve been waiting for this!!!!!!


31 posted on 10/10/2014 1:11:29 PM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

The only place where it might make sense to vote for the dem is Grimes vs McConnell in order to preclude McConnell becoming Sen Maj Leader *AND* only if we are confident there will be a GOP senate majority with ample room to spare. In that scenario, Grimes would be a newbie, junior senator with no power or influence vs McConnell’s well known public penchant for actively fighting against conservatives and conservative issues. Why give him dictatorial control of senate legislation if we don’t *have* to, knowing him like we all do?

All other congressional races, in the *GENERAL* election, we really need to vote R even if you have to hold your nose to do it. If we are back in the good Lord’s graces, perhaps we will win the house, the senate and have a conservative (not GOPe) president.

Now, if we are scared we will *NOT* take senate majority, then vote R regardless. And as much as it pains me to say it, even vote McConnell in that case.


32 posted on 10/10/2014 1:38:44 PM PDT by jaydee770
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Agamemnon

As a young man I worked briefly in retail. That means I’ve spent enough time speaking with the likes of you and won’t waste another minute doing so. I can’t make my message plainer and for most folks, it needn’t be any plainer. Sorry about you.


33 posted on 10/10/2014 1:47:21 PM PDT by muir_redwoods ("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: IChing

3% is usually a pretty fair number. Much more requires too many “acorn” types getting involved with their usually sloppiness and tendency to brag.

Who know this time is right, the dems will be “ebola” desperate and max out, which could blow vote fraud wide open for all to see.


34 posted on 10/10/2014 4:07:06 PM PDT by X-spurt (CRUZ missile - armed and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

One million more people voted for Romney than for McCain. Don’t blame conservatives for Ibama


35 posted on 10/10/2014 4:43:22 PM PDT by wildandcrazyrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Thanks IChing.


36 posted on 10/10/2014 6:13:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

The pleasure is mine, SunkenCiv.


37 posted on 10/10/2014 6:38:13 PM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: IChing

Not sure. Dems do have huge money. We scoff at lame Baraq flying around the country to these dopey dinners, but he is pulling in big $$$ from mega donor statists.


38 posted on 10/10/2014 6:40:34 PM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Jason Mattera is doing great work lately with promoting his new book, “CRapitalism,” on how liberal politicians get rich abusing their offices/abusing the taxpayers. He’s making ambush-journalism videos that are going viral, too—he’s nailed Lois Lerner, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi all in the last week (if you haven’t seen the videos, tell me and I’ll link to them).

With any luck, he’ll get at least some mainstream attention, and the electorate will have increased disgust for the big-bucks hypocrisy of the Koch-bashing democrats....


39 posted on 10/10/2014 7:20:44 PM PDT by IChing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: IChing

Go ahead and link to Jason’s vids. I’ve seen the Lois JustLernin vid, but not the other two.

We can help to spread them around ;-)


40 posted on 10/10/2014 7:24:41 PM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson