Posted on 08/28/2015 9:23:50 AM PDT by Steelfish
The party apparachiks have abandoned the rule of law, the citizens have not, thus the support for Trump.
Trump’s immigration plan would restore the law after 30 years of administrations refusing to enforce the law.
Trump is likely to be the MOST law abiding President we’ve had in a long time.
There is no rule of law.
GOPe = Amnesty = Rewarding Lawbreakers.
What Obama has served to do if anything is show just how irrelevant and impotent the Congress is now. Especially the RINO Congress of Mitch Boehner.
“There is no rule of law.”
We have a Uniparty Oligarchy.
DEATH TO THE UNIPARTY!
The Libs ran roughshod over the constitution. The GOPe in congress sat silently when Obama raped America. When the pendulum swings back in the form of Trump/Cruz, the Libs can't complain. They brought it upon themselves.
The appeal of Trump falls into this category. Though one might suppose that his borderline pathological narcissism, his arrested emotional development, and his nearly incoherent ramblings would exclude him from consideration for county clerk, he sits atop the GOP field. The message from a segment of the Republican party is: “Okay, we’re an autocracy now. So let’s have this guy govern by fiat.”
Tell me, Mona - how is wanting existing immigration law enforced governing by fiat?
Hint: it's not.
In all truth, Trump has nothing to do with Mona’s complaint. It’s the readership hook.....grab current attention because of “Trump”.
The guts of the article is really about her question of “Republicans” and their loss of vision or something with respect to the rule of law - which Obama has consistently ignored throughout his Presidency and will continue to do so.
Mona, I submit that your use of “Republican” shows a very misplaced and ill defined premise. Establishment Republicans don’t give a damn about the rule of law. Never did, else they would have done something in the years since 2012 when they retook the House of Representatives.
The only steadfast supporters of RoL are conservatives - at the condemnation of our quisling Republican leadership who say we are “loony,” “crazies” and whatnot.
Just because you put some demeaning language about Trump in your article with scant relevancy to your too-late plaint doesn’t mean he is the problem of it all. For that, look back to what you’re calling Republican, missy.
But enforcing existing laws is racist!
Not just racist.
We are told it simply CAN’T be done.
Let’s ask Hillary Clinton about the rule of law.
For us, I mean, not her, obviously.
“Have Republicans Grown Tired of Supporting the Rule of Law? by MONA CHAREN August 28, 2015 “
Well Mona Charen ought to know. For years she’s been one of the main GOPe apologists for illegal immigration. A female Michael Medved.
Since when did either one of them care about the rule of law?
They’ve been more than willing to advocate wholesale lawbreaking whenever it benefits the GOP’s desire to replace Americans with latino invaders.
democrats gave up on it ens ago. only pretend to support it when its a law they love.
2016: Year of the PenAndPhone.
TICK, TOCK, TICK, TOCK....
confusion IS CREATED BY ACCUSATIONNS THAT ARE NOT TRUE. stop!
WE ARE IN EFFECT ATTEMPTING TO COMMIT SUICIDE AS A NATION WITH THIS STUPID RETHETORIC.
GOD bless America. LET US REPENT AND TURN TO THE LORD IN FAITH AND TRUTH. NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR GOD!
Most Americans, and most Republicans, don’t even know what the basis of the rule of law is any more.
New tagline ...
There is sort of a rule of law. If you are not a in a “favored group”, you will be prosecuted to the limit of the law. If you are in a “favored group”, anything goes. We live in a time surrounded by malignant criminals at all levels.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.