Posted on 04/10/2016 1:27:37 PM PDT by Shery
Oh wow, so what is the report about then, if I'm wrong? Here, let me help you:
"Lay the groundwork for the freer flow of people within North America. The three governments should commit themselves to the long-term goal of dramatically diminishing the need for the current intensity of the governments’ physical control of cross-border traffic, travel, and trade within North America. A long-term goal for a North American border action plan should be joint screening of travelers from third countries at their first point of entry into North America and the elimination of most controls over the temporary movement of these travelers within North America.” .. A long-term goal should be to create a ‘‘North American preference’’—new rules that would make it much easier for employees to move and for employers to recruit across national boundaries within the continent. This would enhance North American competitiveness, increase productivity, contribute to Mexico’s development, and address one of the main outstanding issues on the Mexican-U.S. bilateral agenda.
Canada and the United States should consider eliminating restrictions on labor mobility altogether and work toward solutions that, in the long run, could enable the extension of full labor mobility to Mexico as well."
“The three countries should develop a secure North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers. This document would allow its bearers expedited passage through customs, immigration, and airport security throughout the region.” The Task Force recommends the following North American regional political institutions be established:
An annual North American summit meeting.
A North American Advisory Council.
A North American Inter-Parliamentary Group to meet every other year.
No, she was an integral part of it, and the paragraph she offered was the only thing she felt needed clarification:
http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102
Click on the Download Now button on the left for the free PDF version.
Heidi’s clarifying comment is in the back.
“Trump . . . a friend and business partner of the biggest one of all, George Soros”
That’s why Soros is paying people to disrupt Trump’s rallies? /sarc
How could he resist? LoL!
“Thought you Establishment globalists got Sunday’s off...”
Just more of your bunk and BS. Nobody believes you anyway.
I just wanted to point that out to you. Bye.
this is old news - anything about Cruz is trash and a lie, but, by God, the Cruzbots believe anything and everything negative about Trump. Talk about LIV - they take the cake.
None of that matters because trump trump trump trump trump.
However, some of it I definitely do not agree with.
Consequently I will not be supporting Heidi Cruz for president.
Wow, you really are either a liar or a complete moron. Even your own candidate, lying to us that his wife was a "dissident" "conservative" voice, isn't stupid enough to claim the agenda of the CFR is "innocuous economic happy talk."
You're good for a smile.
Try to imagine what it's like talking to a deceptive, retarded Cruzer pretending he's read the CFR report, then reveals he didn't read it, then accuses you of not reading it, then claims he went through it and discovered it was mostly "innocuous," while his own candidate is calling the CFR's purpose Satantic. Then you will understand my frustration and rage at these scumbag, lying Cruzers with no morals.
Seriously.
Or start playing video games instead. World of Warcraft or something.
I understand it can be therapeutic.
Just like how, with your filthy, lying nature, you projected on me your own ignorance of the CFR report, I think you are also projecting on me your own diseased mind.
Nerd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.