Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/30/2016 7:59:34 PM PDT by SatinDoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: SatinDoll

yes, but obammy is a clean, articulate, well spoken negro!


31 posted on 10/31/2016 3:32:59 AM PDT by Joe Boucher (hey Bill, rape anyone, Lately?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll; LucyT; Fred Nerks; Brown Deer
Don't get me started!

First of all we do not know who he is, but let's go with the narrative that he was born on a tropical island to a white woman and a black Kenyan on Aug 4, 1961.

This was posted on Zippo's campaign website in '08, no longer there but FactCheck had posted it in reply to a story in the Rocky Mountain News that Barack Obama "Holds both American and Kenyan (since 1963) citizenship."

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5):
Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.
The Kenyan constitution does state that if you do not denounce your other citizenship and swear an oath to Kenya then your citizenship does in fact expire. Originally it was listed on his 21st birthday but then corrected because of a 2 year grace period to Aug 4, 1984. Big deal Greg...Well it is. Enter the British Nationality Act of 1981.
Every person who— (a)under [F105the British Nationality Acts 1981 and 1983][F106or the British Overseas Territories Act 2002] is a British citizen, a [F107British overseas territories citizen] , [F108a British National (Overseas),] a British Overseas citizen or a British subject; or (b)under any enactment for the time being in force in any country mentioned in Schedule 3 is a citizen of that country, shall have the status of a Commonwealth citizen.
emphasis mine

The UK was terminating the title of "subject" and replacing it with "Commonwealth Citizen" in this act. So the date above is relevant because the commencement date of the BNA 1981 was Jan 1, 1983 while Obama was still considered a Kenyan Citizen thus being a British Subject then became a "Commonwealth Citizen" of the UK.

38 posted on 10/31/2016 6:09:37 AM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
Still my personal favorite speculation:
Russian Official: Obama is a Communist KGB Agent
If any of that is true, then my guess is that the KGB sold their devastatingly potent Trojan horse weapon, code named 'Barack obama', to Soros and the Saudis who've deployed it very effectively against US.

Regardless, if any of obama's "official" story is true, then obama is NOT a natural born American citizen and he is NOT eligible to be the POTUS.

However, obama definitely does appear to be black, thus making a president obama untouchable, exactly as we have seen.

Rather than legal challenge to his eligibility, naturally the virtueless and apparently blackmailed capons in Congress, whose sworn duty is to uphold the Constitution, voted up some pseudo-reasonably sounding legalese to cover themselves with, instead.

And thanks to the GOPe's talking heads in talk radio and on the GOPe side of the one stream media, they've managed to deflect constitutional challenges to obama, as well as the charges against their credibility and trustworthiness in office since obama's installation.

For Election 2016, rather than upholding the Constitution and seeking to repair the damage done, the GOPe instead gave US Cruz, Rubio, Jindal and the rest of their party's ineligible non-natural born citizens for POTUS.

We gave them our votes and they gave US their uni-party treason, haughty arrogance and absolute corruption in their pursuit of absolute power.

48 posted on 10/31/2016 9:34:40 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the matrix, merrily, merrily, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll
From The Chosen One by Angello Codevilla

“At the White House, on April 27, 2011, Barack Obama announced the release of a “long form” birth certificate showing that he was born in Hawaii's Kapiolani hospital. There seems to be no reason to question its validity any more than that of any dollar bill—except that Obama has played an as yet unexplained shell game with this bill since 2008. Obama had refused to release not only the birth certificate but his academic and medical records. He indirectly, and his partisans most directly, vilified as “birthers” those who asked for this personal information (a term made-to-order, implying racism, stupidity, and lower-class odors).

Nonetheless, by the spring of 2011, several state legislatures, including Indiana's and Louisiana's, had passed or were about to pass bills requiring any candidate for federal office to show the original or original copy of his birth certificate, and providing for forensic analyses of the documents. Obama’s April 27 release amounts to what John Ehrlichman called a “modified limited hang out”—some information let out to relieve pressure for the release of more. Had Obama done nothing he might have been banned from the ballot in any number of states; had he delayed too long, any certificate he produced would have been subject to close scrutiny. After the disclosure, however, Democrats argued that any and all requests for Obama’s personal information had now been shown to be, in the president's words, “a silly distraction.”

But there was never anything silly, nor light-hearted, nor casual, about Barack Obama’s efforts to keep the public’s eyes from the basic facts of his life, from birth to his candidacy for president. On the contrary, this opacity is a deliberate policy. Why? The presumptive answer, absent testimony from those involved, is to ensure that real facts interfere as little as possible with the image and narrative that he and his associates have carefully crafted for him. Distinguishing between reality and that narrative would require above all a skeptical attitude, sure to be characterized by Democrats and the media in the most derogatory terms.”

http://www.claremont.org/crb/article/the-chosen-one/

Maybe the best article on 0bama that I've read.

50 posted on 10/31/2016 11:37:26 AM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

Thanks for this. Looking forward to the rest. If you have or make a ping list for these threads, please add me. Thank you.


69 posted on 11/01/2016 3:39:20 AM PDT by HoneysuckleTN (Where the woodbine twineth... || FUB0! || Trump/Pence 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

bkmk


99 posted on 02/01/2017 2:00:01 PM PST by SaveFerris (Hebrews 13:2 Do not forget to entertain strangers, for ... some have unwittingly entertained angels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SatinDoll

bumpmark


111 posted on 02/04/2017 11:10:36 PM PST by BikerTrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson