Posted on 05/22/2017 6:37:36 PM PDT by markomalley
I feel sorry for you, that you have to attack every person you don’t agree with, that is emotional manipulation! Please do not post to me again.
FIRE HER, President Trump...ASAP!!
I’ll BET she’s a friend of Ivanka!
Yes..I know you stalk me. Nothing new
That is an out and out lie. I detest your posts and I’m absolutely delighted when I find an interesting thread on which you’re NOT posting. It’s 100% more enjoyable than picking my way through your toxic gossip.
Unfortunately, sometimes I’m interested in a thread you ARE posting on. If FR had an Ignore option, not even that would be a prblem. You’d be the only FR poster on my Ignore list, and it would work out beautifully.
As it is, by the time I see your name at the bottom, I’ve already waded through your fact-free speculation that always, somehow, turns out to be the worst thing that could be imagined, either re Trump or whoever your current target happens to be. Often I ignore it even then; such nasty negativity isn’t worth the time.
Occasionally I respond. That’s hardly stalking, however. It’s merely participating in a discussion forum.
Yeah whatever.... dozens of threads a day I don’t post on.
have at it.
Just out of curiosity, about how many threads do you post on that I don’t? If I’m stalking you, that number should be right around zero. As it is, I have no idea what the percentage is, but I wonder. I suppose I could make an effort to find out. The results might be interesting.
No clue. I don’t pay attention to your posts except when you stalk me and post to me.
Btw, YOU NEVER SEE ME POST TO YOU..UNLESS YOU POST TO ME FIRST.
Get a clue.
That you haven’t the vaguest idea what stalking is surprises me not at all. From what I’ve seen, you just throw out insults and slurs, hoping to stir the pot. What a non-constructive, antisocial MO.
Don’t post to me again....EVER
Leave me alone
Why so hysterical? I post very rarely to you in the first place. Sometimes your toxic anti-Trump posts deserve a reply. That’s not against the rules.
A RINO is not a Republican at all...just a wolf in sheep’s clothing, like McCain. Just spies who lie about who they vote for IRL.
I hate seeing how G W Bush has changed in past few years, sad. The NWO crowd lies to push the agenda, while we end up trusting them, and later regret it. Much like Speaker Ryan, who is RINO and should not have such power...no doubt NWO supporter, which means he is a Traitor to our country and our Constitution. One cannot support a One World Government, and our Constitution and Country at same time!
“I hate seeing how G W Bush has changed in past few years, sad.”
In 1994 California grassroots conservatives were struggling to pass Prop 187, a bill designed to make it harder for illegal aliens to live here.
Texas Governor G W Bush took sides in this fight- he took the side of illegal aliens against the people of California.
So I disagree with you that Dubya “changed”- he was a globalist, No Borders POS long before he was ever elected President. He just successfully lied to a lot of people who were convinced that he was a “conservative”- when the real question is whether or not he was even much of an American. The same dimwit who tried his hardest to amnesty millions of illegals spent his whole Presidency spouting that “Islam is a Religion of Peace”.
What does that make him?
Politically naïve on that subject!
It makes Reagan too trusting since he wrongly believed that succeeding Presidents would enforce the criminal penalties that were part of his 1986 act, a fact which you conveniently omit.
But nice try on your part to make it sound like Reagan was simply pro amnesty.
Or if he didn't people overlooked it because they didn't care about illegal immigration as much as they do now.
I wasn't crazy about Bush at the time (or now) but I'm not going to pretend that we didn't know who we were voting for at the time and didn't vote for him anyway.
Both Bushes were certainly Republican. So was Nelson Rockefeller.
Anyone old enough to remember GHWB running against RR in the 1980 primary would reject the idea that he was a conservative or ever claimed to be one. He was thoroughly Establishment. And Dubya ran as a blank slate who allowed people to project whatever they wanted to on him. The guy who felt “compassionate” needed to be grafted onto “conservatism” in order to make (his Republican liberalism) palatable. What he was was a good Republican in the Northeastern corporate mold despite his Texas home. Neither Bush had ever shown any interest in conservative politics other than wanting the support of those who did.
Reagan’s mistake was in not trusting his own instincts and taking on Nevada Gov Paul Laxalt as his running mate.
Both Bushes were certainly Republican. So was Nelson Rockefeller.
Anyone old enough to remember GHWB running against RR in the 1980 primary would reject the idea that he was a conservative or ever claimed to be one. He was thoroughly Establishment. And Dubya ran as a blank slate who allowed people to project whatever they wanted to on him. The guy who felt “compassionate” needed to be grafted onto “conservatism” in order to make (his Republican liberalism) palatable. What he was was a good Republican in the Northeastern corporate mold despite his Texas home. Neither Bush had ever shown any interest in conservative politics other than wanting the support of those who did.
Reagan’s mistake was in not trusting his own instincts and taking on Nevada Gov Paul Laxalt as his running mate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.