Posted on 02/11/2018 12:03:58 PM PST by samovar123
Sure thing.
>>>the progressive socialist wing of the Democrat party<<<
What wing, that’s the whole Democrat Party in a nutshell.
Them’s Frenchy words.
“Deep State obviously includes both parties or that Juan McLame would not have been involved”.
That’s for certain.
“I am wondering if these evil losers would rather bring down the republic than to come into the light. We may find out soon...”
I think it doesn’t matter as long as they have some kind of power and remain within the loop. Until now they have bitten the hand that feeds them (The USA) but they really have no loyalty to her.
At this point he could probably get his DC jury to bring charges against Donald Trump, Jr., for the meeting with the Russian lawyer, and name President Trump an "unindicted co-conspirator" for not immediately turning his son in once he learned of the meeting, and then bring a charge of obstruction of justice against President Trump for firing James Comey.
'-) ...and, "Darancette" isn't? '-)
Mueller may end up MIA.
Nope, Basque.
Most online genealogical resources have nothing at all (much less a geographical source for) the surname, "Darancette"...
Good luck researching your family's early history, FRiend! (No sarcasm intended...)
~~~~~~~~~~
(FWIW, my wife's a genealogist -- and I guess I've picked a bit of her interest in the subject...)
The surname Darancette came about on 3/10/1340 when the French Lord of Aquitane made Guiche residents take the name of the house (clan) to which they belonged. The house Arancette still exists in Guiche France. The Spanish variant is Arantzeta.
I love family stories like that!
Guess I'm going to have to do a bit more research on the history of the Basques... Fascinating folk!
It isn’t a crime unless it’s collution to cover up anther crime. Clinton collided to cover up her criminal corruption
The collapse of the rule of law is a byproduct of the unaccountability of the court system. Having assumed ultimate power over the US Constitution and thus somewhat directly the other two branches of government bound by that constitution there is nothing to keep them honest.
Accordingly they now issue edicts of their own on a case-by-case basis. They are bound neither by the written law nor even their past practice.
This is the very definition of the rule of men(called judges) not law.
Got other federal employees in the executive branch might also abused their power is not surprising But ultimately far less damaging.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.